비디오

You didn't answer the question you posed in the title.

"Does NASA & SpaceX's Plan with Artemis Make Sense?" - simply, No

I had seen something that implied that the tanks were not quite full for flight 3. That might end up with engines running at 90% or less and fly the desired profile with no need to dump fuel at the end.

I hope the Starliner door stays in place.

Marcus this is a great report. Unfortunately, the use of the word 'ludicrous' in your banner is misused far too frequently. I am sure you did not mean that the Starship modifications are ' unreasonable; cannot be taken seriously, or absurd, or ridiculous'. Yes, these accomplishments are 'amazing, marvelous and outstanding'.

I was in Texas for the eclipse. We had clouds acting as filters for some of the time and due to the clouds we got to watch totality aproach without glasses. And we got views of the cornoa too.

Boeing...🤐🤐🤐

If only L. Ron Musk had nothing to do with this - the world would be a better place.

a Mars cyler is a waste of effort - to use it you have to match its orbit - in which case you are already on the way to Mars. you need the Same amount of fuel (actually more for extra maneuvers. Thus no gain. and a significant waste for the cycler itself as you have to match its orbits just to resupply it.

Marcus, your work and that of your team and contributors is excellent. I am sure that you all have realized by now, that your episodes will help form the understanding of this time in history for future generations. What an incredible story you are reporting and preserving! Thank you!

Here's another episode of construction site news. Look, they destroyed the tank built 2 years ago and upgraded 2 months ago. What a progress.

Now that NASA has announced the advent of the exodus drive, SpaceX is going to have to completely redesign their spacecraft as will everyone else.

Good stuff as usual. Thanks for the upload.

Oh NOOOW they construct a Flame Deflector that NASA did at Cape Canaveral/Kennedy 60 years ago! Oh, but I forgot, this screwy woke lying generation says American Apollo Missions never sent 12 AMERICAN Astronauts who walked on the surface of the moon and the LRO (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) pictures of all the Apollo landers of Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 are just fake pictures the LRO took and all the tracks that they made by their own moon boots and by their Lunar Rover they drove on the surface is all fake too. Sorry...forgot. It's all a hoax. lol.

The proposal we paid for as taxpayers, said nothing about redesigning the entire starship, much less when they should have been doing final testing at this time.

Cocknballz clamp

So great seeing Gilmour Space Technologies' progress! Aussie has been a long time since Woomera! (Yes, there were research launches of scramjet, etc.)

Should anyone travel on a Boeing capsule? I suspect after their recent history, the queue would not be as long.

Can you do a video on how these companies actually make money ??

Marcus I have fallen into a continuous loop on Surfshark in an attempt to cancel my subscription/order before my thirty days is up. It’s now working out for me. Will you help me?

🇦🇺 _GO AUSTRALIA space launch_ 🚀

There are still too much parts of the launch pad, that aren't replaceable fast. Basically they have to learn, to build one in less than a half hour.

Those renders from Callum are awesome!!😮

Starships are meant to fly

Starship Expectations: It might clear the tower, it might reach LEO, it might burn up in the atmosphere, who knows!? Starship Reality: Yep, it's shite.

Elon's flying bucket could barely carry its own weight into Earth's lowest orbit and then smashed into Gulf like a meteorite. 😂 Put some cargo in it, and let's see what happens.

Watching Elon cucks slowly realize he’s a con artist is sooooooo satisfying

Title topic starts at 8:50

I used to be subscribed to Felix's channel, but I cancelled my subscription because his presentation style can be a little off-putting for me at times. I much prefer Marcus's style and there seems to be fewer promotions, although I haven't timed them with a stopwatch or anything. I guess Felix can be irritating sometimes whereas Marcus is never irritating.

NASA going to Mars during the 2030s has already officially been updated to the 2040s. That is not in any way surprising due to the fact that they are completely relying on Congress for funding. They don't even have a vehicle capable of going to Mars anyway. They do have a Mars capable rocket, but Orion is only practical for going to the Moon due to the small size. Elon is even worse at predicting because originally he said SpaceX would be going to Mars in 2022 and the first astronauts would launch in 2024. But I do believe SpaceX will beat NASA to Mars because they already have both the rocket and spaceship. NASA will have to go through the process of selecting a bid winner to construct a Mars capable spacecraft. Even if NASA chooses SpaceX and Starship as a partner, I would see that as SpaceX going to Mars and not really NASA going to Mars because the only thing NASA would be contributing would be logistics. Even if NASA provides funding to SpaceX, I feel like that is irrelevant because SpaceX is going to Mars whether or not they get funding. The main reason that Starlink got started in the first place was to provide Mars funding.

I’m reminded that I really don’t know my geography that well as I didn’t realize Australia was that close to the equator

At 21:57 hilariously looks like the ole British Lipstick rocket, minus paint.

I find it funny that all the sponsors do stuff we only need because of the drawbacks of social media: Ground News we need to break through our filter bubble, Better help we need to get out of our Social Media caused Depression, and DeleteMe to get rid off part of the giant Data Gathering / „Stolen Data“; it’s like selling blue pills on pron sites… - this is like a protection racket. We only used to need „Anti-Virus“… - now we expect our OS to come with an inbuilt solution, but now we have three other problems we didn’t have before… Edit: forgot the VPN‘s we need to get beyond the geographical market restrictions the media companies placed on us… (To be honest VPNs are probably legal loopholes, so the security services get the data of the local population without breaking the law (that in some countries forbids spying on your own people), because the data is now seemingly via a different country.)

Everything is gigantic with the Spaceship infrastructure.

This is hilarious - I’m a space fan in general, and will always appreciate the incredible things NASA has accomplished. For the last decade, everyone has completely $hit on NASA as some useless government entity that’s building a rocket half as capable as starship. Remember when we were placing bets on which would launch first? Just launch, not actually do anything. Yeah, SLS was beat as the most powerful rocket in the world shortly after its launch by starship, but uh… now we learn that SLS (as it stands) can deliver TWICE the payload to LEO, and its upper stage will be vastly more capable (unrefueled) for deep space missions?! I understand that Starship will evolve into a complete beast, but currently, it’s now apparent that it’s simply a MASSIVE disservice and distraction to SLS’ capability. I genuinely hope that spacex fanboys can now appreciate the achievement of SLS launching a perfect mission on the first attempt; capable of twice the LEO payload vs. Starship. In the media (and social media) SLS was simply blown away by Starship as soon as it left the pad. We now know this simply isn’t true (and honestly, at face value the numbers never really added up for me - this shouldn’t come as a surprise for many.) So be humble and give credit where it’s due. If SpaceX were to launch a perfect mission on their first attempt with a rocket capable of 95 tons to LEO - EVEN EXPENDABLE, it would likely take them another ~3 years and the total program cost (including infrastructure and R&D) would likely be approaching or exceeding that of SLS. Which is here today. Yea - reusability will eventually turn the tables, but even NASA and their fans always admitted this. Also, this makes the Artemis plan (endlessly debated as being pointless with the Starship capability) look a lot more appealing (using BOTH rockets, on their current schedule.)

Regardless of who's to blame, the United States Congress is one of the most dysfunctional institutions in the world. I'm amazed that they get anything done. It's a shame, but necessary, that NASA must rely on them for wise budgeting decisions.

Where did they find astronauts foolish enough to get on Starliner? Seems like a death trap to me.

Great show!

To me, NASA is the biggest disappointment for humanity. But I 100% believe that space X will succeed and take people safely to the planet Mars.🙏

Boots before then? Not at all possible. 2050 is still optimistic for people on Mars

If we don’t return the samples from Mars then the whole process of collecting them will have been for naught

More outstanding work! I’m very thankful for a credible source, comprehensive, low bias information combined with an effective, efficient communication style. Keep it up!

I am worried about the re-entry...I cannot imagine how it could survive hypersonic speeds with non aerodynamic form ?

9:18 - It's because Elon Musk always over promises and under delivers.

I lived in NYC for 4 years... My name is Mark. The locals would hear what I said as an Australian as 'Muck' (to much mirth). I'm enjoying your attempts to r-ificate your idiom so the Americans can understand you. I never did get them to understand me... (I moved back to Sydney!) Good luck! (actually fuck-em you speak the Kings' English better than them... Let them work it out. It'll do them good!)

Hi Marcus - Starship 3 might even be capable of single stage to orbit, provided it only had a tiny payload and the vacuum nozzles were a bit different of course. That’d be quite something and might open up crew to orbit and modest point to point possibilities without having to worry about a booster. What do you think? Have I got this right?

You give SpaceX the benefit of the doubt. I wish you were a bit more skeptical about whatever that pathological liar Musk says. Otherwise you just come across as a gullible fool. Sorry.

Slamming a vehicle into a dense atmosphere is neither sophisticated nor efficient or save. With space refueling we won’t need dangerous and expensive slam braking anymore. The structure of a Starship as it is designed now will not survive a slam braking. Far less does it make sense to slam brake in the hundreds times less dense martian atmosphere or land with a slam safe structure on vacuum bodies like the moon. Safe on mechanical mass and use more fuel is the way to go. Now, we haven’t even spoken about landing on natural ground or even just about taking off from such a ground. All this points to a spherical design with an equatorial ring engine and normal engine landing.

Bowing needs to just have all of their contracts canceled. They're just billing the tax payers as kuch as possible, as long as possible while produced inferior crap to even that flat farther that died trying to fly a homebuilt rocket

Starliner! With all the issues it's had, you must have very big cajones to get on it... those are some brave astronauts.