Launch. Land. Repeat.

literally that

Lol

By the time someone flies on this it will be called Old Shepard.

Good one! lol

Underrated comment. Heres a like.

Same here. Great comedy!

Same

Same though

Same

Same!

oof

And for crew 2 success.

Well this is random..
69th like btw

Why do you care so much? Musk isn't going to fuck you.

@@blackhatfreak we like to see progress not a 2 min video explaining how “aggressive” they are trying approaching it. BO at this point is useless. Musk is showing everyone that him and his team are capable. no one said anything about fucking you dumb fuck.

LMAO

LOL! :)

I mean, I want BO to succeed. Competition is great for everyone, but let's not kid ourselves. At this point, SLS is more competition for SpaceX than BO is. BO is older than SpaceX and has literally done nothing new in 22 years. SpaceX went from being a joke to carrying 75% of global payload to orbit, and rapidly iterating a super heavy lift vehicle for transit to Mars with the most state of the art engines ever created. The BE-4 is no slouch but that thing hasn't even flown yet. And every shot of their factory we've seen, the place is empty, devoid of any evidence of New Glenn actually happening. There's a single fairing half that they've been talking about for 3 years now. I'm beginning to think BO is nothing more than a big tax write off for Bezos. Which is sad, because I love competition and new ideas.

@@mycroft16 Honestly I think we need a company that focuses the most on flying everyday people to bring space industry closer to public. Maybe BO will be that company, here in 2021 or earlier than SpaceX and Axiom with ISS improvements

@@mycroft16 The Brazilian long dead rocket project (with about 20 ground causalities) is more of a competition than Blue Origin...

Yet i haven't seen one on blue origin.

@@xTROLLINGx they don’t do a Flip Maneuver 😉

@@xTROLLINGx New Shepard is tiny in comparison to the Falcon 9, let alone Starship/Superheavy!

@@Lauti-cw2zs Or have engine fires that require fire suppression cannons.

Bezos aint giving them engineers enough money thats why they cant do it spacex where they keep making prototypes which pretty expensive.

"Look at that nice, soft landing! Sofffft."

"New Glenne will be more powerful than any other rocket flying today!"
Starship Prototypes: huh
Starship 1 year from now: Need a lift?

If they were just more honest and real with their presentations they would have so much more support. But the commentators acting like they are the only players in town and nobody is advanced as they are while at the same time SpaceX is effectively blowing loads all over their master bedroom and shutting on their dining room table really makes them look like they are being managed by absolute smoothed brain intellectuals. BO needs to get rid of everyone in there advertisements department and just act normal and recognize the truth and be proud of what they have done. Nobody wants to work for these guys because they act like such fools.
Pull it together BO and stop sticking your nose up daddy bezos anuuuss

lol

Str8 up. NO just seems pathetic

😂😂 not nice

@Freedom & Democracy 😂

Blue only exists to make ULA look productive by comparison.

😂💯

They should change name to Blue Balls.

@@slaphappyduplenty2436 they can't get it up (to orbit)

@@amjd2569 😂😂😂

@@amjd2569 duh. Nothing that turns blue can get up ever.

@@amjd2569 technically they can
In a starship payload bay🤣😂
Or maybe even a Vulcan or a SLS better yet rocket lab😂

Everyone is roasting them

Honestly. Haven't they learned ANYTHING from the white house? :')

@@Centurion04 Blue Origin and Jiffy Jeff doesn't giva FUCK what you guys think! 🤣

The turn-off button is in orbit.

@@JohnJTraston They launched it on a SpaceX rocket! ONID! 🤣

Jeff who? XD

lmao

When they do it with zero crashes then We will know who is on top

@@xTROLLINGx lol it does not matter if they made zero crashes or not because they're advancing super slow plus making mistakes will only make the rocket safer.

@@KJoulani "making mistakes only makes a rocket safer" ... ?
Designing a competent vehicle makes it safer. Testing is *supposed* to be for finding the unexpected, not learning how to design as you go.

I'm looking forward to New Glenn at least. Blue Origin do most of their work behind closed doors, so likely we won't know how much it's developing until shortly before it actually flies

Falcon9 crashed a couple of times in its infancy. Guess who carries humans to the ISS?

What? Oil rig? Lmao

Blue oil rig LMAO

Lmao blue oil rig

Blue MADE Rocket Lab go to orbit?? Oil rig?? Are you high?

@@regolith1350 I think he means the Student group rocket lab. They got their funding from Blue origin. But they didn't make it to orbit either . They passed the karman line with their traveler 4 rocket... becoming the first all Student group to reach Space

I was thinking the SAME thing! It's like they just re-edited the video from a few weeks ago and thought we wouldn't notice!

True dat.

It's hard NOT to post a video near a SpaceX crash.

@@Monkeyheadtpc It's even harder to be a spaseX hater

I think it's not linked to the SpaceX activities. SpaceX is doing almost all the time something impressive... So, that time was just for SN15 :) Maybe next time it will be for SN 35 and the landing on the moon :)

which isn't nearly as impressive, but I'll take it. More rocketry :)

Also ULA

It’s like that Twitter post Elon made when someone posted an article about the blue origin lunar lander and Elon replied with “can’t get it to orbit lol”

I think the timing of this video is the problem. SN15 sticks the landing and the next day BO releases this.

@@erasmusguy8289 Bezos: Don't pay any attention to SpaceX, I'M STILL RELEVANT

and yet they want the contract to go to the moon

Exactly! And there in lies the problem.

@@spaceboitv5646 they were only the first stage for that bid. Shows you the overcosts when you partner with the dinosaur military-industrial complex

"Orbit" is lateral motion, not height.
Why would that be important here?

Never

Lol

@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Height wont bring you anywhere in the solar system. To reach other moons and planets you need to reach earth’s orbit and then perform a translunar/orbit- injection so your apogee reaches the desire moon/planet/etc. All you need is horizontal velocity, not vertical aka height

@@Jasper_Prime This system is designed to take people into space. It meets design goals. Nobody has left orbit since Apollo 17 in the 1970's.
So it's just lateral motion that is the issue for people? Or that BO isn't a Telcom company? And isn't launching satellites?

Based toxic

🤣😂

Here before blue origin take your comment down to the ground, the same level as all their rockets have been

lol!

The timing of this release isn't lost on me; one day after the amazing success of SN15 by SpaceX.

It’s like $500k per seat right? That still makes it the cheapest means of getting a human above the karman line and into space by a pretty big margin.

@@keco185 Yeah but it's only space via a fairly arbitrary definition. I'm sure some people will pony up the bucks but orbital flights are totally different and much more impressive.

@@FleshGolem420 Supposedly 100km altitude is around the point at which the speed required to generate a non-negligible amount of lift with wings exceeds orbital velocity

@@FleshGolem420 orbital flight will be like 20million.. so 500k is pretty good for a 15 min ride to space

@@dummyjoe7895 But then the only point of the company would be the entertainment side of it, no space exploration or making new discoveries. It's just an expensive and more dangerous roller coaster?

This product competes with virgin galactic

They can't.
The last decade (Commercial Crew, NSSL, Artemis - all of which they were passed over or lost to SpaceX on) has proven that. And that's while being backed by the richest man on earth.
That's not a knock on them, because no one has been able to compete with SpaceX. At this point, they're competing for second place with Rocket Lab (and that's not totally fair to RL, because they're launching to orbit and iterating rapidly unlike Blue).

@@patmald I think he is talking about the company blue origin and not the rocket.

I know right, we want some good competition but SpaceX is just too fast compared to other space companies like BO, VG, RL and Boeing

Competition creates a lazy winner

I don't have $300k so I'll have to imagine it.

@@jshepard152 Just imagine that you have $300k.

You won´t see too much from 100 km up. It is just the edge of space.

That's because they've been doing basically the same thing since 2015.

@@FleshGolem420 If we didn't have NSF covering Boca Chica 24/7 we would say the same for SpaceX. They launch Starlink every other week. I don't get why people expect anything and hate on Blue Origin. Jeff Bezos spends his amazon dollars on something space so that should be something to cheer on not hate on.

@@KsNewSpace How is saying "this feels underwhelming" hating?
And how can you compare the things spacex do at boca chica to this?

@@KsNewSpace my guy going to suborbital isnt thrilling they are aiming too low

@@KsNewSpace Even without NSF, SpaceX still live streams all their flight tests and give official yearly updates on Starship. Not to mention how much Elon Musk goes into detail on Twitter about SpaceX's programs and vehicles. Blue Origin on the other hand, in regards to new Glenn, have basically only shown its fairing. Now that's genuinely underwhelming.
Mind you, they're under no obligation to share what they're working on but it's clear which company has more heart in space exploration and pushing the envelope than the other.

Its coming?

Does it really matter when starship will be ready before new glenn is even testing

I ain’t hating them, I just hate the company haha

this is their PR public and marketing department

@@andrejeffry lol I wish haha

No hate for them, I hate their company procedures, I bet engineers want to see their hardware flying more often

@@janos1945 I’m already going to hell because I’m gay. So HAH

That term still applies here. Go look up the term again kid.

@@xTROLLINGx Yeah, sure its re entering the atmosphere because it left it and touched space. No reentry with extreme heat, plasma and such. Those two are not comparable even if the same word describes them

@@bjarnes.4423 Tell that to Alan Shepard, I'll bet he'd be delighted to hear that his 11.7 Gs pulled during the reentry from his suborbital flight was no biggie since it wasn't a "real reentry"
Reentry from orbital flight and a hop above the Karman line aren't comparable. Doesn't make the term less invalid for a flight like this, nor does it mean it's trivial to achieve

@@bjarnes.4423 All those effects you mentioned are from *lateral* motion. Orbit is about *angular* momentum, not height.

@@bjarnes.4423 So what qualifies for reentry then? How many km/s? Meteors do 40 km/s. That's more than any rocket could ever launch stuff at. Maybe only that qualifies for reentry so humans never did it. No.. whatever goes outside the atmosphere into space and comes back "reenters" the atmoshere. It's all the same no matter what speed. I don't like SpaceX fan arrogance. There is no point hating on a billionaire spending his money on space stuff unless you hate space. Maybe that's it, you're a flatearther! rOcKeTs cAnT gO tO sPaCe bEcAuSe oF tHe ThErMoSphErE

💉👨‍🚀🙏🙏🚀👨‍🚀 Dear citizens of our beautiful stationary flat Earth, all space agencies can't get high enough, in order to show homosapiens a non CGI Blue Marble., including fakeX along with Nasholes. Be smarter than a typical globezombie animal swallowing pseudoscience and let's united and allocated the money to make flat Earth great again 🙏 let's end the chemtrails, fracking, fluoridation of our waters, DEW direct energy weapons, GMOs, 5G, and scammdemic 👹 avoid mutant experimental vaccinations and the double covidiots masks 😷...krplus.net/bidio/o9KafWOIfmfKZKQ

@@Landoparada360 you went too deep in on the troll for it to look legit unfortunately

@@Landoparada360 gl next time tho

@@Landoparada360
Glad SpaceX gave you the day off.
Enjoy your day. Back to work tomarrow.

@@kelpdock8913 Well, he did succeed in giving me cancer with that comment, so there's that..

Why do you Muskrats care this much about BO?

@@blackhatfreak because BO has stagnated, Electron is, at this moment, the only true competitor of SpaceX
It's not funny being the only one doing orbital stuff, we need competition, not a company that's proud of doing the same 15 times

@@MrTitanic14 Your little joke might've worked if only New Shepard hadn't landed first and Blue Origin hadn't done VTVL rockets like Goddard and Charon years before SpaceX even thought of doing Grasshopper.

@@Nowhereman10 I mean, you're right
The problem is: it doesn't always matter if you're the first if you don't know how to use it or have a purpose for what you have done
Is like mixing a lot of drinks that mixed up taste like booger, but can cure cancer. If you don't know its purpose, you'll just throw it down the drain

@MUHAMMAD FAIQ Gulistan-e-Johar Campus Even though Falcon 9 is being launched on a fairly regular basis, it is nowhere near close to the R-7/Soyuz rocket. Even at the current rates, it'll be a long, long time before that and rocket families, like Delta, Atlas, etc, still have quite a lead.
Also, many billions have been poured into SpaceX by NASA and the U.S. military, as well as private investors, like Google, so I would damn well hope that they're doing something!
Blue, despite what the ignorant SX fascists claim, has never gotten anywhere near that amount of money.

LOL 🤣🤣

😂😂😂

You mean Super Heavy booster. That could work. Bezos pay Elon

Oh so funny!!!!!! Love it

@@Nightdreaux22647 the complete thing is also called Starship.

No one cares

No offense, but you seriously underestimated the stupidity of the press.

It is.

deja vu

All i know is the glenn was a mythical artifact

@@rosekreuze bruh you are funny😆

@@rosekreuze Just like Starship

Why do you guys even care?

@@blackhatfreak Because apparently Blue Origin doesn't care about their own progress in space, which is bizarre for a space-solutions provider. We just like to point out there is something fundamentally wrong with Blue Origin.

Which is too boring for their taste, so they release something in similar duration as this one which is the how not to land video haha

@@groundsymphony I am waitting for the starship one

I thnk they know that would be boring.... so they decide to put new milestones instead!

@@tudormuntean3299 'How not to land an Interplanetary Starship'
It's going to be a classic.

Yep

That Crew Abort is a big deal though.
We would have 2 dead Astronauts if it wasn't for Crew Abort.
Some companies skip important things, some don't.

Who skipped crew abort?

@@slaphappyduplenty2436 'starship' among others. NASA vehicles and Russian vehicles have demanded them historically, and they seem like a good idea. We'll see how it develops.

@@brendanariki Get to orbit without humans, refuel and get humans to the starship on a vehicle that does have abort capabilities.

@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 I understand why you and many other people are hating on starship for not having an abort system.
However, there is a reason for starship not having an abort system, it's just not feasible. Every day astronaut made a good video explaining it and other starship design decisions. Perhaps if you actualy understood why SpaceX made the desighn decisons they did, you would see that starship is not as stupid as people like you make it out to be.
Every day astronaut's video: krplus.net/bidio/ppqkgn14mZG5ZoI