New Glenn’s Tank Cleaning and Processing Facility

Ha ha ha..😄 so true!

FACTSSSS

Excellent comment, exactly what I was thinking. I look forward to seeing New Glenn launch though.

😂🤣😂🤣💀
Yup, I could not have put it better myself.

You didn't have to choose Fatality, bro

They all that and more years ago for New Shepard flights. And if you bothered to watch Blue's videos, this is the second major update about New Glenn in about a year. They've also done a lot of videos covering the Huntsville engine factory as well.

@@Nowhereman10 What tone were you taking my post, because your reply seems a bit defensive?

@@RyeOnHam LoL it seems like your the one getting offended for no reason.

I think the last camera operator and host probably retired after a long career in covering the New Shepard development.

Jajaja

That's still impressive in my book

This guy gets it.

So when did BO do B,C,D,E technically? :+)

Yes thats what I mean to

This is a perfect description of how I felt about their online presence. Thank you! 🙏🏻

There will be #spacex and others

30 ft shorter than High Bay.

@Shourya Bose LOL

@@econojon i guess the host is just in love then

There is no comparison between the great space x and this dumb blue origen

Their secretivity is inducing risk, I guess it's worth it for them

So long they pressure test it with water it's not really a big deal. Water does not compress so it does not expand / explode on tank rupture as a gas would do. It just gets really wet.

Water yes, but where is the fun in that?

@@KsNewSpace /end thread

@@KsNewSpace if it doesn't compress. How does it build up pressure then?

go look at their other video they just posted then lol

Can’t wait till we see new glenn for the first time

@@coreytaylor447 None of their videos show New Glenn. They show one in the early stages of being built, but that is it.

@@jneutra1 that is New Glenn. just because its not the final product doesn't mean it not there

@@jneutra1 So you don't call SN15 a Starship then just because it's not been completed yet?

yeah it makes no sense

maybe she meant pressure washing, but said pressure testing?

maybe they want to do the tests without being seen?

@@AndryanGouw Oh we'll definitely see it when a tank blows up in this building.

u misunderstood ur grammar classes in grade school

Go look at the other video.

Bezos❗

HAHAHAHA

In the time they built this 3 buildings spacex has made like 7 in boca chica in half the amount of time

and now they need to launch it into orbit

No they didn't. They just hired contractors to do it.

Did you see the other video? They are building the rockets.

@@Nowhereman10 plural?

@@DeeSnow97 Watch the videos and listen. The Exploration Park factory is designed to build multiple New Glenns (is building them) and the processing hanger at LC-36 can hold and process up to three of them.

@@Nowhereman10 wow, what an amazing advancement, especially compared to... what's SpaceX on right now, SN19? If we count early stages, that is, which seems to be the Blue Origin way.
Listen, you're not technically wrong, but there are ways of lying without ever saying anything untrue, just implying it. The context you're replying to here is SpaceX's Boca Chica facility, which is currently light years ahead of this thing. And that's a problem, because the New Glenn is about on par with the Falcon Heavy, not Starship -- speaking of which, SpaceX Hawtorne currently has multiple actual boosters in there, not just a mockup and space for two more.
I'd be all for "team space", but when Blue Origin acts like a shitty team player and claims they're the "only one" doing something, it's kinda important to look at who else may be doing it. Again, just a bit of context, we don't exist in vacuum. (Especially not Blue, they have no hardware there yet...)

So cool maybe in 10 years SpaceX fans can stop being so tribalistic!

no, she'll only be on the sixth floor by then

@@iamarokotmanson So I guess pushing them to be more competitive (considering ever increasing space exploration) is wrong then. No wonder why we haven't gone back beyond LEO in almost half a century

@@iamarokotmanson You just randomly individualized "spacex fans", only tribalistic one is you

Sounded like they will pressure test each rocket that is made. I'm pretty sure SpaceX does that too with Falcon.

@@KsNewSpace with static fire at McGregor TX I guess.

ah spaceX fan boys, morons who pretend like they know how space flight works, how business are run, and think speed is the only metric to judge success

@@coreytaylor447 dude, it’s a joke, know how to take a joke

@@qwertyeet you would be surprised how many times it isnt and they are being serious

@@coreytaylor447 if it is serious, it would still be true

@@coreytaylor447 Jeff is a book salesman, Elon is an actual rocket scientist and software engineer.

Yup

How is this the first time I’ve head this 😂

Seeing what they can do without competition, this should be crazy!

@@janos1945 Not really though, ULA focus on the harder to do missions, interplanetary stuff and all that. They barely do any LEO missions (apart from the occasional USAF mission)

@@ryanritter7814 absolutely

@@janos1945 yup ULA, spacex, and even rocket lab can be considered competition - but blue origin will be the biggest spacex competitor since they have the most financial backing (bezos)

They just announced New Glenn won´t fly before Q4 2022. I wonder if they timed these videos to soften the blow.

Watch the other factory video, A-hole.

@@Nowhereman10 you know that's just a tank mock up

@@JamieG. and flight tank sections and a fairing

Did you not watch it?

@@iamarokotmanson that is true, i hope they launch before the 4th quarter of 2022

Virgin galactic at least reached orbit

@@lapistaoftheparadise4627 sub-orbit but it’s still space!

That depends on your goals for each company, Virgin is space tourism, Blue Origin is tourism and lunar delivery and exploration. They’re leading the lunar lander development

@@brcshephard LauncherOne made orbit recently though, right?

@@brcshephard Leading the lunar lander dev? Says who? they got some money with SpaceX and ... the other one. And Space X have delivered PEOPLE to orbit, and will probably be the first to launch tourists as well, not for a few seconds either, for a few days, THIS year! Wake up!

I think starship will be back from mars when they make it into orbit

Sad that SLS is making more progress than BO lol

Still good to see some competition.... Whenever they actually have a rocket...

I think the argument pedantic people would make is that SpaceX doens't build the falcon 9 at the cape so BO would be the only one that BUILDS it, flies it, brings it back and flies it again FROM THE CAPE. Working together is the way to go with space though, and that starts by acknowledging the accomplishments of those that came before you.

And yet they try to make it sound unique... its not. Its just a factory in a different place. A very nice factory, very pretty. And empty.

@@Miranoff Yes, and worded by a lawyer to insinuate they are doing it all first. It is weasel words, but they have such a beautiful facility and rocket, but still keep pretending they are leaders all the time. Although their engines are good.

As was already stated, SpaceX does NOT build their falcon is at the cape.

With humans inside

yes, what if there's a RUD? does the building contain it? or will it bulge, a bit

You forgot "on the Cape" in your quote. How comes?

@@KsNewSpace Because it's really sad that the only way you have to say that your imaginary paper rocket is unique in any way is constraining it to a particular region.

@@KsNewSpace Because Space x do the same thing at Boca, and mostly the same thing in 2 places at the cape, so its a bit cheeky, Like saying they are the only heavy lift rocket in the US... painted with a feather. But they are years behind and way more expensive.

@@RacefanPat68 No, no they are not. Most of that work is confined to Boca Chica, Texas. Most Cape Starship work came to halt and transferred to Boca Chica.
And you have nothing to verify your last statement.

@@thomasackerman5399 1. I said they do the whole shebang AT BOCA, twit
2. I said "most of that" at the cape, they dont build Falcon there, but they land, and re-cycle dozens of boosters at Four facilities at the cape.... Everything from launch control, refurb, payload integration and Returning, I said MOST, so Again TWIT
3. It is public knowledge the differences in price between the SpaceX Blue Origin and for that matter ULA programs, mainly obvious from their cost per flight, toLEO, and cost per kg comparisons..... I dont really need to verify, I made a claim, it is true.

Even if it uses water. This wall won't hold and it will damage all the electronics in the building

now thats a relevant question!

They refurb them and build them at the cape?

@@iamarokotmanson yes they do in the hanger on pad 39a

#teamspace

#teamspace

The only smart comment! I'm huge Elon fan AND i'm also excited to see Jeff Who's rockets

I'm #teamspace too, I just wish Blue Origin behaved like a team player and not like the wannabe Amazon of space

Totally agree, spot on comment. Yes, my enthusiasm for the new BO info is tempered by the lack on team playing and transparency on their behalf.

My humble opinion is, that they develop their rockets too much like NASA and their good ol rocket friends have done in the past. But they have done it to gain more money out of their sponsors hands. Blue Origin doesn't have such generous backers behind them, so they should get their money to work any time soon to make money with New Glenn

Space X doesnt build its rockets at the cape, they build them elsewhere im fairly sure, i wanna say in hawthorne cali

@@austinreid3951 I didn't say that they built them there they build them in California and assemble them at the Cape

@@flashbarry6838 All "assembling" SpaceX, ULA or anyone else that's currently operating at Cape is attaching the payload to upper stage and attaching upper stage to the booster. BO is literally building majority of the rocket at Cape. Sure you can be a dick about it, and twist the words and try to argue what the exact wording means, but BO still has best logistics, because majority of the manufacturing and operations happens basically in the same area. Much like Starship prototypes are being built at and launched from Boca Chica.

@@beloved_lover yeah, that’s what I have a problem with. Blue Origin is basically ignoring the existence of Starship, they literally said that the New Glenn would be biggest rocket... which would even be true anyway because of SLS...

@@dakotamahlau-heinert3529 I don't know when they said that, they didn't say it in the video? Back in the days sure they might have said that it will be biggest operational rocket once it's ready? I'm pretty sure they know Starship/BFR will be bigger once it's ready.

That is not going to happen. New Glenn will likely launch by the end of this year, if not early 2022.
Despite the hype, the Starship prototypes have a LONG way to go before they are capable of reaching orbit. Maybe late 2022 at the earliest for Starship, probably later. There will likely be more spectacular tests that end in a RUD that will add to Starship's delay.
Starship may be the rabbit here, but slow steady and deliberate is Blue Origin's approach.

@@jayrod9979 We know for fact that is not going to happen, New Glenn is NET late 2022: spacenews.com/blue-origin-delays-first-launch-of-new-glenn-to-late-2022/
That's a hell of a long time as far as Starship's development goes. BN1 and BN2 have already started stacking in Boca Chica, and if SpaceX perfects the landing, the very next step is orbital reentry testing. Given that SpaceX has actually been to orbit before a few times, the chance of them not hitting orbit even on their first try is absolutely minimal, the most likely thing to fail is the reentry phase -- but, by that point, orbital Starship is going to be a thing.
And that's definitely going to happen before late 2022, the only way around it would be if they had 10-20 more RUDs on landing. That's just not something that ever happens to SpaceX, they never fail the same way twice.

Shit, missed the article that says it got pushed back another year.
Hopefully that is it for set backs. Bezos has the money to get this done. The only way they will when DoD contracts is demonstrating they can get a payload into a set orbit.
Very disappointing to hear about this latest setback. Hopefully now that Bezos stepped down from Amazon, he will focus on his space venture.

@@jayrod9979 The Problem is Bezos himself. Blue Origin has too much money. They don't rely on serving customers for funding, which means no deadlines, no pressure, no nothing. They need to get their act together. SpaceX is showing that it can be done and with the funding it has Blue Origin should have overtaken them by now. But they haven't - it's a problem of work mentality I think

@@jayrod9979 this aged well

Is that a star wars reference?

@@iamarokotmanson nah its from this the other day
swarajyamag.com/insta/give-my-regards-to-you-puppet-master-elon-musk-takes-on-jeff-bezos-over-negative-washington-post-piece

That was the best response ever!

Rolling, but what about flying?

Well if you add the build factor into it which they said it's technically true. But it's a cheap af statement

And it being at the Cape

@@renew1572 yeah lol, they had to specify the Cape because SpaceX Boca Chica is doing the exact same thing, but like in a way that's actually gradiatim ferociter

@@renew1572 but they have not built or flown or returned or re-flown a rocket so how can it be technically true? lol

@@-mike-8134 the sentence is about that the place is able to do it not that it does it

Yeah, honestly, this is the entire problem. There are so many comments saying we shouldn't criticize BO because #teamspace or whatevs, but there's no team spirit here.

Why? There is nothing to see.

Did she say that there's no other facility on the cape that reuses and assembles rockets 👀 I'm pretty sure that SpaceX is gonna have a problem with that statement

@@flashbarry6838 Bezos tries really hard to ignore the fact that SpaceX exists lol

@@flashbarry6838Spacex is only assembling the stages at the Cape so technically the statement is true.... but cheap AF nevertheless.

@@gundross that's what I said...and how is that cheap though

@@flashbarry6838 BO statement is cheap, they are not unique.

They are never going to build it, so that won't be a problem.

#teamspace

It was postponed to Q4 of 2022 lol

First orbital flight is likely to be late 2022/ early 2023.

@@iamarokotmanson Which I have no indications to believe. Lets wait till it happens and then get back to my comment.

@@iamarokotmanson If you asked anyone last week they'd have said this year. Rocket deadlines are NET, don't bet on them.

FS best comment so far!

Which is why I prefer SpaceX

This video would have been better if New Glenn was inside it.

It's so hard to like because it's basically ULA and friends all over again. Billions of dollars every year, very little progress, government funding. They've been at it for 20 years at a tune of a billion dollars a year, and they have nothing to show for it.

@@almafuertegmailcom lol, good point, Blue Origin already became old space without a single orbital launch

New Glenn is coming along. There have been a few leaked pictures of part of it.
I can't wait until all the naysayers are proven wrong.