How the Khazars and Arabs Became Enemies - Arab-Khazar Wars DOCUMENTARY

Will be eagerly waiting for the next video 🙏

Background music becomes too fucking loud and I can barely hear the narrator, do you even watch your videos before uploading?

What happened to khazar video

I really appreciate all the effort yall put in the videos. Could yall please do battle of Khandaq next please!❤

Yes the centralization of Khazars as a polity was led by the Ashina dynasty of the Göktürks it also marked the beginning of Common Turkic languages slowly replacing Oghur Turkic in the Western Eurasian steppe

​@@nenenindonuWhere is the source?

So were the Bulgars and the Huns. Ashinas held sway over Desht-i-Kipchak until Bordjgin lineage swept them from power.

Not exactly. I think it was more that the Khazars kept an Ashina clan member as titular head to give them rights to control other Turkic groups.

​@GuidoMumin you sure? Thought it was the uyghurs who over threw the ashina for being corrupt...
Also, ashina was the rourans blacksmith slave until the gok turk rebellion bc the rouran chanyu refused marriage if his daughter to his "blacksmith slave"

Because it's fairy tale. I read Dunlop - all sources of Muslims about it are contradicing made up bs written 150-200 years after the events... It probably never happend

me either

Khazars are father of Turks

bro who you think these modern day jews in israel decend from? and hteir hatred for muslims still carrys on til today

@@stormlah ok

That's not true Bulgar groups of the Volga river are white people européens and blue eyes blonde hair Acording to ibn fadlan when he mates them and mates there tribal chieftain they not turk people as you said

@@samiman5606 cringelarp

@@samiman5606 🪤

@@samiman5606 Bulgars are an Oghur Turkic ethno-tribal group and their language is well attested Volga Tatars and Chuvashs are their modern descendants

@@samiman5606 I think you have no idea about the history of the Turks just like ibn Fadlan who's yelling about the lack of ablutions between them Turks who lived in between nowaday Russian-Ukranian geo. (Yeah, washing yourself 5 times a day at -30 C degrees, such a great idea to kill yourself).

Proof that it was Khazar?

​@@Ghiyath981I don't know most of them says they're the lost tribes of israel

@@rebellefleur2993 😂😂 Qoyunlu were Turks.

@@Ghiyath981 So is Khazars and Karakoyunlu.

Ak means West and Kara means North. Its not a colour rivalry just a geographical term for Turks. For example Blacksea means northern sea.

Try knights of honor 2 sovereign as well

Well said

Modern day Ukrainians aka “AshkeNAZI”, aka “Israelis”.

Crusader Kings?

My (Jewish) grandfather told me that the leader of the Khazars (a Khan?) asked missionaries from the three Abrahamic religions if they couldn't be their religion, what would they choose? The Christian and the Muslim both said Jewish, hence the conversion.

@@0giwan yeah nah, they were force converted at the edge of a blade. They were given the choice of 1 of the 3 Abrahamic religions. Before that they were Talmudic polytheists. Babylonians. Hence the “pagan” rituals and traditions carried on to this day. We just call them “the holidays”.

I was so surprised when I learned about the religion of the Khazar people in the Middle Ages. And knowing their descendants is quite widespread in western countries today

Al-Arab: This was very easy ❤❤❤❤

​@@user-fl5mq9kp7gNot a single Arab city in the Caucasian area today so not really lmao

@@itzikashemtov6045 So how did the Arabs take the cities of the Caucasus and make the Caucasian kingdoms like the kingdom of the Alans and the Armenians and Georgians surrender to the Umayyads?

@@itzikashemtov6045it’s not like they would relocate Arabs into new cities or just enforce a new culture and language on conquered peoples

@@itzikashemtov6045 lol Really? just go stay there until the Time of Adhan ;)

Mongols are not Turks, not that I'm complaining, but it needs to be emphasized

@@Karabulut96 Precisely my point for the video request...

there is many different and separate ethnic or nomadics tribes or feudals or clans

Why don't you start with Rene Grousset's "The Empire of the Steppes a History of Central Asia."? It's unsurpassed.

@@Karabulut96 Mongols are not Turks but the majority of the subjects of the Mongol Empire were Turkic and Turkic languages became the lingua franca over Mongolic. When the Russian states were under the Mongol Yoke, the invaders are called Tatars because they were mainly Turkic.

Had to or we’d get warweary just hearing about all the bloodshed

😂😂😂😂😂😂

🤣🤣🤣🤣

According to Constantine Porphyrogenitus, there was a strong connection between Turks and Khazars. He says: the nation of the Turks had of old their dwelling next to Chazaria...at that time they were not called Turks, but Sabartoi asphaloi. They lived together with the Chazars for three years and fought in alliance with the Chazars in all their wars. Their first voivode called Lebedias married a noble Chazar lady but had no children...Then the Pechenegs came and drove out the Turks. Most of them settled in the east, in the regions of Persia.

the reall reason of how khazar become kinda powerful is ummyad was conquering the world from france into china border , and khazars place not so important

The founder of Seljukia is Tughril.

Khazars are Turkic and Turkic people were far spread from borders of Mongolia to Europe

@@EM-tx3ly yes they were. The Byzantines did not always distinguish them for the general term Turks. That is because the Khazars were part of the Great Western Turkish Khaganate. Same applies for the Armenian and Georgian sources. They autonomously sprang out when the Western Turks were troubled by civil wars. Arab sources (7th - 8th c.) use both Khazar and Turk. Al-Mas'udi however mentions that the Khazars are amongst the Ughuz, the Karluks, the Kimek. Some Chinese sources and Theophanes of Byzantium equate Khazars with Turks. 💪💪

Al and Qyzyl/Kızıl were both more common names for red whether as region or color than Kırmızı was

kara also meant noble, for example among the karakhanids

Mavi is also Persian, that word was adopted through the Seljuks. Most Turks called blue "gök".

@@Karabulut96 In contrary Kara means inferior. For example Kara Budun refers ordinary people without any title.

​@@alibak5537In modern Turkey, it was different throughout history

Umayyads: I defeated the Khazars and made them pay tribute to me

This alliance was considered controversial by Roman Christians, as they considered Khazar and other nomads beyond Caucasus as part of GOG MAGOG.

We were there back in times of Byzantium-Sasanian war, As sabirs (later big part of Khazar) If you see a video of byzantians making alliance with nomads during sasanian war, it was Sabir Turks

As a Turk, I don't necessarily disagree. Its just that it sounds cool in English. But in Turkish, Oghuz, Nogay and Tuvan sounds so much cooler.

@@yusassin1449 Jie, Khalaj, Alat, Sabir, Barsil, Shatuo... way too many names that sound good hard to pick one as no1

@@nenenindonu Agreed, they sound awesome. Especially since it implies a horde of nomadic horse lords, throat singing, across the steppe. It just makes it that much cooler

Turkic,not Turkish.

@@alexanderdimitrov6916 Thanks. 👍

Can't agree on maps, especially on the Sassanids eastern borders and west of Caucasus

​@@ramtin5152 Can you shed some light for us?

@@Ghiyath981 Unlike what's shown in the video, west of the Caucasus and northwest of Mesopotamia weren't part of the Sassanid empire during or before the reign of Khosrow Anushiravan
Sure, most of the Caucasus was under Sassanid rule but one third of it, the western part, was under Roman rule
Again, unlike what was shown in the video, during the last Sassanid Byzantine war, most of the Byzantine empire was conquered (temporarily) by the Sassanids especially the Levant and Egypt
And finally those "kingdoms" in the east of the Sassanids were actually the names of CITIES, and most if not all of them, were part of the Sassanid empire and though there were indeed some kingdoms there, they weren't established until one, two, three or even four decades AFTER the fall of the Sassanids (which fell in 651)
Like Turk Shahis (established in 665), Zunbils (established in 680) or Turgesh Khaghanate (established in 699)

@@ramtin5152 The Southwest Caucasus was part of Lazica, not Byzantium.

@@Ghiyath981 Lazica was under Byzantine rule at least as a vassal which was even recognized by the Sassanids

They are going to do that at the end of the Ottoman Empire series. That is what I heard, but yeah I cannot wait for that one

almohad was never a caliphate

I don't kniw if what we have readily available can make an 8 minute video.

So then on two of the fronts they were stopped by Romans. Not khazars.

Qutaiba ibn Muslim Turks slayer😂

Are you saying that huns were turk and they halted caliphate expansion in india.

Huns didn't halt calipharte expansion to India, Rajputs did(almost for 3 centuries).

Saying Huns were Turks is like saying British were chinese. And nobody stopped expansion towards india, caliphate only wanted Sindh coasts to control pirates. Qasim conquered Panjab for no reason at all. Caliph Suleiman basically killed all the conquerors from all fronts(Spain,India,central Asia,Iraq) within a year to erase his older brother's glory and thus he destroyed the expansion of the Caliphate

They do on Patreon.

I hear you

Yeah, I also don't understand how photographic memory is going to help you with remembering knowledge that was passed on *auditory*, as Abu Huraira didn't write, nor was the Qur'an visually presented anyhow.

They have a Cypriot Archeologue in their script team, of course they wouldn't miss that

Abu huraira was a scholar and was more specialised in Hadith,Islamic tradition and Islamic jurisprudence

They hid it i guess. it was in the nomadic civilizations playlist.
Khazarian jews might have something to do with it 😁

Hmm maybe you're right

It is on the list somehwere

@@KingsandGeneralsYay!!

ya

@@KingsandGenerals will you include the original Khazar video? And what happened to it?
(Wink if mossad is holding you hostage, and please dont ban me i love your channel)

European Jews: 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😢

Karaims don't have Khazar DNA and their language is borrowed from Kipchaks and Crimean Tatars, not from the Khazar type of Turkic. The Karaims' ancestors were Jews who lived in the Byzantine Empire and Middle East. For further reading: Dan Shapira's article "Khazars and Karaites, Again" in Karadeniz Araştırmaları No. 13 (Spring 2007) on pages 43-64, and Kevin Alan Brook's article "The Genetics of Crimean Karaites" in Karadeniz Araştırmaları No. 42 (Summer 2014) on pages 69-84.

@@user-jr4kc6lu9q There is only one mass conversion to Judaism happened among Turks and thats with Khazars. Karaims and Krymchaks are descendants of Khazar groups who now spoke Kipchak dialects rather than being local Jews who learned Turkic language as a lingua franca. Their original dialects were altered with Kipchak possibly in times of Crimean Khanate. Their version of Judaism is also different from other Jewish groups.

Bulgarians are Bulgars are different people, Bulgarians are slavic(mosly) composite people but Bulgars are Turkic people. Still, I agree your suggestion. It would be great if a detailed video was made about the Bulgar they have a very interesting history. I'm especially very curious about the how Volga Bulgars the first Turkic tribe to convert Islam in Turkic history and how Danube Bulgars turning into a Slavic Christian state after the Kubrat Khan period.

@@CruWiT this is not completely true, the Bulgarians came to the Balkans and by no means assimilated several tribes of Severs, Smolyans, Strumyans and others, over time the Avars, Pechene and Cumans entered their country, who also over time assimilated the successors of the medieval Bulgarians and assimilated them of them are the modern day Bulgarians, as Franks Gauls Romans Scandinavians Britons and others form today's French, today's Bulgarians have more DNA of old Bulgarians than any other assimilated tribe, this hypothesis that.old Bulgarians are not the current ones is very weak if you read more

@@CruWiT The Volga Bulgarians are the opposite of the Danube Bulgarians, they became a minority and after the Mongol massacres and resettlements, their descendants have little or no DNA of the old Bulgarians, but some of the people still call themselves Bulgarians and keep their traditions from the old days, the Danube Bulgarians on the other hand, they easily dominate and assimilate the other tribes and their successors are massively with dominant Bulgarian DNA, but this does not matter, the nations are the fruit of the 18th and mainly the 19th century, there is no nation that is the successor of only one old tribe, most of them have more than 10 different ones, the Scandinavians are more clean if this is a correct statement

@@IvanIvanov-pl8bm I know this, my friend, the concept we call nation today is a political concept, otherwise it does not matter how much Bulgars or Slavic genes the DNA of today's Bulgarians carries. Todays, Bulgarians speak Slavic and see themselves as Slavs, that's why I said they are mosly Slavic. Maybe some Ludogorets people who live there still speak the Turkic Bulgar dialect They can be called Bulgars because they see themselves that identity, it doesn't matter what their DNA is.

@@IvanIvanov-pl8bm Original Bulgars had 40% East Eurasian admix. Modern Bulgarians have 0-1%.

Return to your country in the Khazars and leave Palestine to its people

Josh 0%

@@damnthezionists1708As a Turkish our Khazar ancestors have nothing to do with those Gayraeli trolls!
We aren't baby murderers like them!

Decided to remake it into a mini-series. This is the first episode.

@@KingsandGeneralsjarrah add Abdullah definitely remember them from the old video too bad the former about to lose his head😂😊

@@KingsandGenerals Also, once this year is over, you might wanna add it to your nomads playlist just to make sure.

Little correction, Black indicates North and White West

Even China and Japan use that system. Its more of an Asian thing foreign to westerners.

​@@nenenindonu Nationalists have manners.😊

Maybe internet changes it as nobody can control internet while the winners wrote the history books before internet

Volga is Russian, in Turkic it is called Itil. So actually the term Itil Bulgar is more commonly used in Turkic literature.

​@@HorvardPashaThese Bulgarians were funny when Ahmed bin Fadlan invited them to Islam. They used to say, “Does God resemble humans, does God have a wife, how can God live without a wife, and things like that?”

@@user-fl5mq9kp7g Ahmed Ibn Fadlan didn't invite them to Islam, you are getting some facts wrong.
Ibn Fadlan was sent there on a diplomatic mission and criticized their way of practising Islam, as the Itil Bulgars were the first Turkic Khagante to accept Islam as a state religion. He criticised that women have a say in politics and military or that men and women clean themselves in the river at the same time.
So in basic terms, the Itil Bulgars Ibn Fadlan found were a far cry from the ideal image of a Muslim to his time.