Who Is Responsible For Climate Change? - Who Needs To Fix It?

Your the best channel ever!

hi

Ok... I don't expect advertisements 8 months later

So cool vids!!

I will do my part to lower fuel emissions by not buying merch.

noice

fax

nope, have you watched the video?

I mean he’s not wrong. We breath out that stuff all day

S you got liked nice

Climate change doesn't need solving it is natural and cyclic!

Ted Clapham but humans are making it faster jackass

@@veckstocks9710 yes probably

@@veckstocks9710 yes actually

We are all ruled by stupid peoples.

跟鬼佬讲这些没用，它们要的大家都心知肚明，它们只不过在给自己立牌坊好站在所谓的道德高地不停地指手画脚而已，并不是真的想给自己加限制。

@@zhangyi5145 中国应该负环境变差点的责任，这毋庸置疑

@@guitar--hero ？不看人均？

@@lckglckg258 不就是因为你们的毛泽东弄得人口这么多，污染才这么多吗。

@@lckglckg258 不看看人口为什么这么多？

«I love that this video is not biased. Most other channels blame developing countries like China [...]» They still missed something big: **accounting for imports/exports** of greenhouse gas emissions per capita. A.K.A. carbon footprint. So for example the figures attribute the emissions for making EU & US electronics and goods mostly to Asian people.[1] Rich countries are outsourcing emissions to other countries and the video misses that.[2] It changes + or - a few tons of CO2 for many countries and part of the ranking changes.
Source: Wikipedia "List of countries by carbon dioxide emissions per capita" and compare section "Production-based emissions" for 2015 with "'Consumption-based emissions" for 2016.
China goes from 7.7t/person to 6.27t, rich countries gain 1 or a few tons depending on if they have a manufacturing or fossil industry that exports. A dramatic example is Belgium going from 9.2t to 15.61t. Likely due to not having much industry. Check out the above source for more.
Caveat: that's still not complete, it's not actually the carbon footprint, it's CO2 only and not all greenhouse gases (so it misses a lot of agriculture impact and all leaks from gas industry) so all the figures should be a bit higher and countries ranking should again change due to difference in food diets (% of animal products) and again upping the rich countries. Anyone knows where to find such data? To solve that last big bias. And is anything else big missing?
[1] a laptop is like 0.5 ton!
[2] almost a third of the carbon footprint of someone in France are goods. And more than half is imported. source: course 8 (Carbon accounting) at École des Mines 2019 by JM Jancovici

Developed countries are still polluting the environment today, they have moved polluting factories to developing countries，They stopped polluting their own country, but didn't stop polluting the world now, It is hypocritical for them to cheat on environmental protection

What do you mean no excuse for following the same path? Do developing countries have any other options other than burning coals and gas?

@@huanglong08 I mean they should try their best to use alternative energy as much as they can

@@ashwanthvinod5190 how? Are there any developed countries willing to share the clean energy tech with them for free?

lol

Rip

Yeah we hella screwed

Ideological fanaticism is big problem when it comes to climate work.
1) Here 20% of population is shut out of decision making because "their way" to fight climate change is wrong
2) Our Green party is jamming and hurting developement of Fossil fule replacements due "We arent allowed to cut more forests"
Hard to get wood based fossil fuel replacements, if you arent allowed to make them.

We’re fucked

This comment deserves more likes!

Thats got to be the highest body count that I saw in a yt comment...

Where is this from? It sounds like something Douglas Adams would write.

r/almosthadastroke

@@Killerfox512 It is

yeah，we Chinese don't need Greta，we all know what we should do to save our earth.

China polluted more than others because China has the biggest population. Per individual the pollution is fewer than Americans.

@@luceafarul579 Last I saw per capita China had 5 times the amount of plastic ocean pollution than the US and Indonesia has 4 times that of china. Even though the US has more ocean access ports than any other country. Now they do lead in CO2 emissions but the people guiding "green energy" in America are proposing plans that are counter intuitive by only looking at one part of the life cycle.

@@stephennewcomb4575 lol so? I never said China never pollutes anywhere. You are talking about just ONE type of pollution china has more than US ooptido.
China actually leads in green energy in the world. It’s the largest producer of wind and solar energy for example. China also literally turned desert into forest. So doesn’t matter how you want to measure it, China leads in environmentalism over the US. I’m sure the ocean will be next.

@@luceafarul579 A good example is Austria and Brazil has over 27% hydro alone. So definitely room can be made.

呜呜呜太感动了，这么客观的视频好正能量！太支持了📏📏📏📏📏📏📏

@@murphyzhao7343 我们是为其他国家服务的，谢谢

@@murphyzhao7343 No country can live without sacrifice

@@linke5008 Some countries sure can since they are richer😭

@@murphyzhao7343 No selection

@@xtensioncordtv1969 kinda... but its more of a slow walk than a run towards the goal.... sadly...

@@xtensioncordtv1969 Nah man Iceland, Norway, Scotland and more are all using a higher percentage of renewables

Please take some time and Google this; "46 STATEMENTS By IPCC Experts Against The IPCC" or the "Suspicious Observers" 🧙

😥

@@malepauling7431 What do you propose? People losing their jobs? Economies smashing into the ground? People's retirement funds being partially or completely wiped out?
All because you want renewable energy now? What a selfish and idiotic worldview.

*big brain*

Common sense!

Lol

If the US stopped all it’s imitions it would barely do anything globally.

Nah, I pass. I don't like cults.

Pretty blatant CCP propaganda.

@@thimble347 Right, right, speaking for China is CCP propaganda. Speaking for the West is freedom and democracy. Which country are you from? It makes me sick.

@@godtolove6984 It's one thing to speak for China, it's another to reiterate nothing but Xinhua talking points as you do so. Facts are, China has done very little to improve it's own footprint and likely never will - especially now that they're facing a recession due to the failed zero covid policy.

​@@thimble347 China's per capita carbon footprint is insignificant compared to western countries not to mention that she produces the most products for the world. The best way to bring down carbon emission would be to make western world poorer and waste less energy, and fortunately that is already happening.

@@tinkerknight8022 If that's the case, why did China refuse to release it's economic data this year? Furthermore, China is already on record as having the worst environmental impact out of both the US and Europe combined. Air quality indexes alone show how horrible their policies are for their own citizens let alone the wider world. Let's not forget the unregulated over-fishing of the worlds oceans by vast amounts of fishers who frequently poach other nations waters, especially in Africa where their government's have been debt-trapped to be powerless to stop them.

中国在环境问题上已经付出了行动，而且是有效的，但我们还是需要其他国家的努力才可以营造一个美丽的地球，而不是互相推脱责任😓

ನಿಮ್ಮೌನ.....ಹಂಗ ಅಂತೆರಿ ತುಗೊ ನೀವ್....ನಾಡಾಗಿಲ್ಲದ ಬಾದ ಸುಳಿ ಮಕ್ಳ ಅದೆರಿ

现在其他国家已经放弃碳中和了，他们提出这个议题就是为了限制发展中国家加拿选票@@wdia2333

@@wdia2333这的评论都在互相骂，不知道说啥了

At least we can screw the earth even more for another year

@@squigga_4237 well that's not a good thing to be proud of..

lol

So 2021...
I’m more scared now than I was about the 2020 downfall

The good thing about 2020 is that emissions were down globally for awhile

Not rlly cuz in “who farted” it’s not everyone’s fault that person farted lol

lol

Literally

More like which group of people dutch-ovened the entire room

ಠ_ಠ

American tradition: I am sorry for this, but I do nothing to compensate you

Yeah and the fact that the average American emits nearly twice as much as the average European is ridiculous. They emit nearly THREE times as much as the average Italian.
Americans must be insanely wasteful if they manage to emit 3 times as much as us and we already drive everywhere and don't put _that_ much thought into it.
I remember reading in the comments of another video that it's common for people who have second homes in places like Florida to leave the AC/heat on even when they're not there, because otherwise their poorly built houses literally rot from the moisture building up.
That is INSANE to me, and probably to every other person on this planet who isn't American.

@@demoniack81 Its absurd and negligent to a good portion of Americans as well... Its sorta the majority, but when you dive into specific policies, most end up split by party. And while the USA is more of a Democracy than China, its a pretty poor one, so it doesn't respond to it's citizens views very well. When you see the "Political Polarization" hyped news articles about the USA, Climate Change action is a dominant reason for that polarization. In other words, somewhere around half of the USA is fed up with the other half for not acting, and are breaking apart their relationships in response. Some are literally splitting up their families over issues like this. So at least some are taking action.

Yall know the info in this video is outdated right?

It's everybody's fault not just the US's

但现实却只有超少人会记住😥

我会，希望你也会，长辈们思维已经固化，也不会为能源危机、气候危机考虑，甚至不知道有这些事，但我们这一代需要改变，这样我们的孩子就会接受更有效的环保教育，而不是停留在面子上的口号，要落实到行动上，这样就不至于等你我老了以后到处是雾霾

True af

Kinda like humanity in a nutshell but first it's good then it's bad then it's good again and then it's bad again..

Do you have something original?

Every Kurzagesagt video:
-Has a copied comment like this

Why do people keep liking copied comments?

Yet we are the only species on earth that collectively can try to change their future. Humans are amazing.

@@superpantman yet depressing...

Yeah, NIMBY is a real thing.

Sometimes we only learn when we face the problem itself. We're pretty dumb lol.

Wayanoru Lunar'Starsong more like a few specific humans

the climate is going to warm up regardless of what humans do, it's the endless cycle of the earth between ice ages and warm periods. the last ice age ended fairly recently, so the earth is supposed to be warming up to a degree

​@@rasmusvohlakari2304 at this rate.... nah we fucked up.

And relentless...

But it ain't as simple as that, it's not fix, it's stop. And the people benefit from the problem.

the Innocent, "what did I do to deserve this" *fixing the hole*
the actual hole makers, "challenge accepted" *making more holes*

Wrong. You wait to fix the leak, let everyone else drown and then plug the hole last minute to save yourself. Now you don't have to share resources, you have it all to yourself.

What if I gave you $100.000 Dollars for making the leak only a tiny bit bigger... Most people: give me that cash and an axe, please..

@@electronresonator8882 You don't pour gasoline on a burning house and then complain about nobody putting it out.

Lol Ben Shapiro probably got triggered after this video dropped

i hate it when there are no replies on a good comment

Stephen Robinson @liberals

Facts? What do I need facts for when I can *FEELS* whatever I want!

I wanna see Ben Shapiro respond to this video.

Russia isn't too developed. Neither is china.

I agree, the right of veto is really stupid

Me: *eats plastic*
_im helping the ecosystem_

Said every country in the world

Classic bystander.

@@randomthings6977 underrated

Why is this so true lmao

Yes.

Great quote ngl

amazing quote

Germany- ......

@@TheFinMyster ?

''Which countries emit the most carbon dioxide per person?"
People inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide.

Most of politics in a nutshell…

Most of politics in a nutshell…

The United States is always blamed for being one of the worst in terms of pollution, despite being one of the biggest advocates of clean energy. The entire reason we pulled out of the Paris Climate Accord is because we aren't going to be the only ones to sacrifice our economy so everybody else can feel good about themselves. The EU and friends didn't give a damn about the agreement.
Yes, before anyone had a clue about climate change, the US polluted more than anyone else. Such a shame they weren't psychic. Now stop bringing up the past.
No, we can't begin today. The idea that we can just stop using fossil fuels is ridiculous.
Considering everyone's heavy reliance on them in daily life, the cost to replace *every single thing* that uses fossil fuels, the jobs that would be lost, and the horrible effects on the economy would be more than enough to bring America to its knees.
The Green New Deal is garbage, climate activists have unrealistic expectations, other countries are hypocrites, and we aren't stupid enough to destroy our way of life. It's not happening, so quit crying about it.

@@jamesmoriarty9433 oh yeah sure Mr.Trump let's get back to using coal bc its such a great and efficient power source

@@jamesmoriarty9433 This right here is true no one was following the rules of the paris climate accord but america. Why make a deal when no one else will follow it especialliy when those other countries like China talk about wanting to replace us all the fucking time.
We need to slowely shift oil companies to begin investing in other forms of energy and to manufacture solar panels (which needs coal) to replace the oil jobs that will be lost. Nuclear fusion is the future and without it were never gonna stop any of this

True

Its so easy yet we dont

"'Let's fix the world' said everyone, not knowing how"
- A guy named Bill Wurtz

"Everybody wants to shit, but nobody wants to wipe."

Ironically we actually do know how, we’re just too lazy because everyone that needs to do their job *isn’t* always going to do their job because they aren’t immortal and immune to every single disease in the planet, (but also many of them are just assholes), we expect or want someone to do something yet we don’t act when we *need* to do what we wanted from that someone who didn’t do what we expected. And if we do do it, we’re just angery and then we all just blame each other then the cycle repeats.

but mostly we westeners.

Everyone? Nope. Many are taking their responsibility and contributing to a neutral greener world.

I thought the same thing.

@@austrianfuck7450 Asia?

USA and Europe and they are not doing enough, so third world countries will continue to burn forests to feed their economies and become developed countries

@@Corgi_fax yes. yes. water has feelings.

@@Corgi_fax they have higher iq than you

@@hahahaha-jj8op now thats a lotta damage

That's very true. I'm just curious about one thing. Which flood are you referring to? Or are you just meaning any flood in general?

In chinese, it's like“当发生雪崩的时候，每一片雪花都在勇闯天涯”lol

Exactly, not only Germany did that but the US did as well.

@@Ayveh Yes, many countries. I just used Germany as an example since I'm German myself, and before pointing to others we should reflect ourselves.

We should stop buying from China anyway because of their use of literal slave labor, among other issues.

Germany loves blaming Poland for it lol

Well, if China didnt have such cheaper and shittier environmental restrictions they wouldnt be putting out so much emissions in the first place.

Green-Omb also politicians: yes oil companies I will take your donations to not enact laws limiting emissions.

Donald Trump "Climate change is a hoax invented by the Chinese"

@@footballnerd277 what's weird is the Chinese dont care about global warming lol

@@anoon- and so does USA during the 20th century how about you who has the resource start reducing on it too its not like you emit below 10 percent of emission

@Kraptonite yes they certainly will reduce it soon or later, they had to

Here before 64 likes

It would

Corporation with dozens of factories: you should just walk instead of drive come on guys

All they do is burn the plastics or send all the trash to poor country's like india, china etc...

China isn't poor

news flash it LITERALLY IS

We only gonna start once Hawaii literally sinks or some shit

Even after that they'll keep on blaming each other... Look at the world now. When we should come together and fight covid. Countries are still blaming each other

@@danr943 Well, technically it is China that's responsible so that example is not that valid

@@vegetable1495 Islands are already literally sinking, but nobody cares because they aren't affected.

Let's invent a thing inventor said the thing inventor after being invented by a thing inventor.
By the way, where the hell are we?

Ikr

Actually the thing is they do but to stupid to actually *do* it

And nobody want to really move.

A wild Bill Wurtz reference appeared

And it's what you'll hear 10 years from now if nothing is done, except the person saying it will be on fire while saying it.

we are doomed to death

The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.

Just saying but planting trees will basically do nothing for the climate. Individually and even in groups people can't tackle this, no, countries themselves have to take action against climate change. If they could ban CFCs then they have the power to stop climate change, just not the willingness. That being said planting trees is extremely great for forests and wildlife, I suggest you all to change from Google to Ecosia for your search engine, it plants a tree for every 45 searches so you can plant a lot of trees without leaving your home.

Global Warming is now irreversible however we can still can prevent a warming of 1.5°C to 2°C by 2100. But it’s getting more and more unlikely. 4°C to 6°C is were we are heading by 2100

Depends on what part of Canada and what time of year. There are many areas in Canada where the water in dams doesn't freeze. Also Nuclear power plants wouldn't have an issue with the cold.
As of right now Canada is almost completely bought up by large oil companies, which is the primary reason there hasn't been any change.

You misspelled *Corporations twice.

It is already too late for our planet. Our best chance is to find refuge on another planet like Mars.

@@SaitoGray tf you talking about crackhead?

Ikr and when Greta thunberg gave her speech, we made memes of her instead of supporting the movement. Politicians would love the sight of gen z killing each other.

@TheIlluminatiMember he’s saying it’s corporations not everyone.

Western still try dumping their trash to asia

@Viktors Puksta There's plenty of actual proof of climate change, if you don't believe it you are in denial.

@Viktors Puksta that's the "go in denial" part

@@hyoroemonmeto6874 no Asia (formost China) is bing the plastic :-/

@@CapitanoGUC-gf6el its facts, you can look it up. western company's send their trash to asian country's

@Kent Horvath the world is saver today, but a climate crisis can and will change that very rapidly. We need to do everything in order to prevent a climate crisis.

@Kent Horvath in this analogy, your basically saying, "the boat's only leaking a little, lets not fix it and worry later when the boat starts sinking"

@Kent Horvath you didn't watch the video lol

@Kent Horvath Floods and hurricanes. Ever hear of those? Take a good look at the states near the coast. Look at the numbers. Do you see it rising? Great.

yet the only ones with tape to seal the boat are blaming on the ones that have no tape and waiting for them to do something lol

Correction*
More than the half of world 80-90% because many countries are still underdeveloped or developing.!

And I would be surprised if they did it to reduce server energy consumption

What was the last time 2 leaders addressed the situation directly with actual real time interactions without exiting the room?

More like:
'I couldn't hear the question'
'Oh, ok i will repeat it'
'No its ok, lets just move on to the next one'

China can fix it by having a 0 child policy

Answer: we are all

Internet Explorer]
I’m sure you’re meaning to have a constructive conversation, but I can’t really understand you. In your first paragraph you stated that most of our products are made by people desperate for work, which is true. However, in your second paragraph, you say that *consumers* are slaves to products. So which topic is it?

if it werent for industrialization we would still be in the ice age 😣

Me:*grabs popcorn*

@@omatofi No, you are right. The so called 'market solution' is not a solution at all because the current rules created that result in the first place. And the rules are not fair or correct in many cases. It's an externalisation of responsibility.
What needs to change is law. That way, established companies will have to change their practices - which is much faster, easier and more reliable than building new companies from the ground up, only to compete in an unfair environment. But changes in law are slow at best because politics is too influenced by those who benefit short-sightedly from the current situation, and too predicated on personal belief.

Until you watch The Hated One's debunk video.

yeah this is a heavily biased video

To be fair though, we are also a large coal and oil exporter.
So if we can ignore the outliers, you can at least smudge numbers down a tad for Australia.

@@EvilParagon4 With global capitalism, there's always some way you can shirk responsibility. China/India's response can be a similar "we are just supplying the west with cheap consumer goods". Where we land on the pollution rankings is not as important as figuring out what we're going to do about it.

@@pannychanman I just mean that identifying outliers and giving them a pass is a precedent already set.
If we don't want to have that issues, we shouldn't ignore those outliers.

Read this upsidedown

At least Australians can change this in a couple of minutes by divesting from fossil fuels and investing in renewables through switching their super fund to Future Super and their bank to Bank Australia.

US and China: "We don't do that here"

those two are the spoiled brats in your preK class that can't play nicely with anyone! just looks at them.... it's always about mememememe. _(:з」∠)_

"I'll do it first if you start before"

@Don't read my profile picture I went through all of that and after I clicked "Read more", it said don't subscribe and do not like this video; so I didn't.

Classic strawman oversimplification. No one thinks it's one countries problem to solve this. The arguments are over who should contribute the most and in what way. It's not as simple as assigning blame - the arguments are about the nature and level of actions to be undertaken. Exactly the sort of thing anyone would argue over.

The thumbnail is trying to get people to take sides. Let's just get off of KRplus and read a book.

You no what yup your right its OUR sin even the the other people we should have reduce it now but people built weapons so its out of cintrol

Control sorry

China

@@alvinstrom6443 the magical word to all problems

hehe yee

Lololololololololol 🤣

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 mostly china

Ian Mubangizi, not true it hurt pretty much all countries in different ways. Rising sea levels, temperature, low resources, political problems etc. Also it says here ( *7:26* ) that the “developing countries will be hit the hardest” and then gives a short list of more examples.

@@ianmubangizi6721 i guess you don't watch the video, huh. Western countries pollute way more than developing countries per person as they are already rich now (wealth=pollution). The past century was marked by those western countries polluting the world first which make the total contribution of their pollutions higher than china. China emits the most pollution as they are starting to become richer and have way more people than all western countries combined. So, you are a hypocrite for attacking china as even today most of the pollution in china is caused by the outsourced pollutions of your western countries corporations to make their products cheap which is mostly sold to western consumers.

Have you forgotten that London used to be called the city of fog? (no offence)

Blaming is cheaper

maybe because there is no solution? And it all going to get only worse and worse from now on

jur4x Oh there is a solution, and there already countries getting rid of oil and gas factories, but it’s too damn slow.

Because solutions don't get you elected. People like tosee quality of life go up not down.

@Tommy Belciano 雷 Then if the solution is futile say goodbye to humanity and have fun watching your great grandchildren suffer and die on a dying planet... smh cant get over how dumb some people are to say something like that.

Considering there are different species of birds, this is the same as a human eating pork

country moreCountry Moore like human eating a chimpansee

@@candadismycountry periodt.

Lol, good catch! That is kind of gross

@@candadismycountry No, it's more comparable to a policeman eating pork.

Bill wirtz is very wise

The planet doesn't need saving, it will be just fine. We're killing ourselves.

@@Brokkolesz Bad plagues kill themselves, no?

Bill "Wurtz"

@@Brokkolesz no, all we have to do is stop causing emissions and die off, then the animals won't have to adapt to deal with what we've done

That is exactly what I thought about the climate change issue.

Thank you. People tend to forget that China is figuratively the slaves that run the world. Sad but its not surprising they have such a high carbon emission.

If we eradicate the sweatshop children and most of their population, we immediately improve the worlds health. A dozen nukes should do it and once we take out that superpower, there would be no country who would dare retaliate against the U.S.

@@Cthulhu013 hahaha

Fuck finally someone with a sense

yeah, everyone sees people as nations and not just people

Just human nature

Ya that’s dumb you can solve it but you still blame there people

every one is to blame for climate change and no one is one cause for it its just that every one needs to stfu and go green all of the people in power are old farts that think it does not exsist like trump ect we need people who are younger and people who can see the damage we are doing to the environment we need to stop useing fossile fules also they will not least forever because there is a fineite amout of fosile fules that means it will run out eventualy and we would have to end up useing green power but it would be too late. Some ways of green energy are
nucllear energy - no carbon emitions but very hard to get rid of wast
wind energy - cheap and easy to use but very dependent on wind
solar energy - very good in sunnyweather but expeenccive and less power when cloudy
water power - dams and other methods but very expencive
another way of reducing emitions is to encourage biking and have more no car zones because it has worked fantasticly is some areas in the world there are so many ways of perventing climate change but all of the idiots in power are not lissoning and doing nothing.
during lockdown the world has had time to heal and repar its self and we can see this in countries like china who had smog before lockdown and no birds chirping to haveing no smog and haveing the birds cherp. because if we dont stop our ways now our planit will die and we will along with it and it will just be another barron planit in the endless void of space.
also for all of what we know we are the only civilisation in the universe and if we dont treat our planit well we will fall and the universe will truly be empty
idc if you hate this but things need to change and sorry for my spellin

@Pagani Zonda China is doing more by tree planting and limiting the emitting while USA quit the agreement.
Your comment that it pollutes more than all other nations is subjective. Your comment itself is subjective and I literally didn't see any stats you provide here that support your objectiveness which make you sounded neutral while assuming it.
They are putting effort in throughout the years responding to the summit and it's own people.
The argument of this video is that benefits comes with responsibility, and the inequality created by industrialization is arguably not the reason to one line cut the global emissions.
China is doing a lot in my observation. Definitely not enough but indeed more than a lot other nations. China limits lifestyle emissions, enforce trash separation and recycling. Stopped importing electrical and other trash, planting impressive amount of trees, putting serious amount of restrictions to pollutive manufacture, and in major cities, no more open air BBQ, no more 2.0 and more engines for family uses. China also have environmental enforcement in every cities, and have actual law to prevent individual or enterprises to over emit and dump. In China, cutting trees without permission is a crime.
Chinese people also stopped burning for warmth in major cities and this trend is tremendously expanded over the past decade as cities opt to natural gas warming supplied from powerplants instead of burning coal by community or individual families. Over the past fifty years, it built one after another nuclear powerplants and remodeled or replaced tons of thermal powerplants. China has largest inland power project in the world which it started while it is really poor because it realized burning coal is not the solution and is not sufficient for industrial needs.
Near Beijing, China is building xiong an, a model city that eliminate cars and makes people sufficient in community and rely more on public transportation. If it successes the Chinese cities are going after this model, which increases human interaction and reduces commute in the same time.
Quit your double standard and look for facts. If we eat less beef and stop luxurious fireplace and high emission cars, we can contribute. China needs to do more, but the established world also need to move in. Doing this and contribute together, so we can survive.

There has been some slight cooling over the past century, but I don't think that we can really do much to reverse the milanchovitch cycles. The title "who's to blame" perplexes me.

Litteraly

I dont feel guilty as im vegan

And elementary school kids are gonna be the next generation of leaders. Hopefully they’ll do something. 😔

Keanxz they'll grow watching decision makers of their time do shit, they will still do same

Climate change is fake news. Vote Trump 2020 to abolish corrupt scientists advocating for this bullshit.

@@AzNMadnessXXXXXXX Ah yes, we shall replace them with scientists paid off by the Koch brothers and the fossil fuel industry.

Time for us to act like Earthlings and not Indian ,American etc

We are definitely not the most intelligent thing, there are plants and fungi a lot smarter than us, check out Michael Pollan

@Stygian Eons Fuller counts with him

Gravestone Science

That's pretty obvious, ever heard of trial by error?

@@soejrd24978 being more adept at certain qualities, like ants farming or slimemold adapting, doesn't make any of them smarter than humans. Unless one of the animal species or fungi you mentioned can do everything humans can do and more, then they're not more intelligent. (though they are possibly more intelligent than certain singular humans)

Thanks kind german

Thank you! Can you also write down the original statement? It's hard for me to recognize the letters with that font.

Now?

@@emadomar1021 "Wieso denn wir?"

@@emadomar1021 "Wieso denn wir?"

And tomorrow is to late

@@emperorborgpalpatine it is a expression

@@emperorborgpalpatine nice try, no like. even tho u clearly were going for it xD

most underrated comment!

@@_blank-_ Planting trees is good.

The odd part is that the countries making that arguments (China, India, etc) are also countries where energy-efficient industries are flourishing. China produces most of the world's solar cells and hydroturbines and has the world's largest tree-planting project, and India comes up with the most ingenious inventions for doing more with less energy.

@@day2148 Thank you for telling me this!

@@day2148 Producing solar cells is in now way shape or form an energy efficient industry. If the same solar cells were built in a western nation they would adhere to much stricter environmental policies and cause less environmental damage per W produced.
The reason we all shipped our industry to China is because it is cheaper, due to them having far less standards and more people with no say. Globalism makes us think its a good idea to triple handle every material, dig it up at home, send it to china to be refined then shipped back home as sub standard goods that last half as long as they should, meaning you have to buy it again sooner.

Odin Thorsdad oh no don’t ruin the kids irrelevant little factoid

The countries that polluted the most in the past didnt even know climate change was a thing

The EU and China are. The US swings between denial and action

Eugene Ng China isn’t doing anything, what are you talking about?

no

I can't do anything I don't have money so I just felt bad this whole video🥺💦......welp

@@eugeneng7064 It's arguable if China is doing anything because it's hard to see what is *actually* going on in that country. Lots and lots of projects done for the glorification of the government with no substance or sustainability behind them.
And as for doing something about it, it seems pretty easy to think of ways this could work both environmentally and economically. The developed countries could put money into researching and developing clean energy technologies that are then sold at the "early adopter" price among themselves, driving down the costs for developing countries to do the same. This both accomplishes the goal of reducing emissions at the countries that emit the most as well as getting developing countries - which aren't currently emitting a ton but would soon if no other technology were available - to adopt the technology as soon as possible.

Except for the US, whose current administration outright denies that climate change is real and the climate isn't affected by people in any way. It's hard to say if they're just stupid, or they know the truth and are lying because they don't want to give up using their sacred oil for everything. Not to mention the oil billionaires and millionaires profiting off the destruction of the planet.

@@mvvagner as a US citizen, help

@@mvvagner Help us

Socialism: being very generous with other peoples resources.
People just got start doing something

Mvvagner someone’s got to make them realize that that won’t last forever, and if the planet dies, there’s no more business for them. Especially given that sustainable sources are cheaper to implement and could thus make them more money than their current system. I’m very sad that this has happened to our planet, but we’re in the stages of. Climate change where we can still make a difference, and we should.

Modern society in a nutshell.

Edit this it’s getting a lot of likes and it’s a typo

Ah yes. Chage.

Boom. So true

Yes it is quite unfortunate that people don’t want to chage.

You're right. I nominate you to fix it.

imagine 3 persons are suspect in the court during trial and one of them killed someone. if logic "it's not important who did this" is right, then all of the suspects are guilty.

@@abitw210 i get your logic, and i agree some countries are worse than others, but when the trash fills the oceans inbetween land masses we no longer have time for any blame games. The entire world needs to come together on this now to enact laws and policies that allow for a greater impact than what individuals can have on their own. its not always an "individualist" issue.

There are a few admirable persons who devote their life to preserving environment,sadly they are still in the minority.

Jinsi K are they sure that earth’s overpopulation is the problem? Because if human start to address that and them become underpopulated, business will suffer and then they will say it’s a problem of underpopulation.

@@ChenLiYong I'm okay with that

The best change we can make as individuals to reduce emissions is to live a vegan/plant based lifestyle as this will allow less land/resources to produce our food, which is essential to fight problems such as deforestation, biodiversity loss, species extinction and ocean dead zones for example. People can argue or make excuses all they want but this is objective and it's best not to shoot the messenger. Check out cowspiracy for more information 👍

:(