The Insane Engineering of the F-35B

China said thank you so much 😂 if you could make a Chinese version it would be great help😅

@@ikea7739 I had an idea for a flying aircraft carrier for this jet!!

F-35 need xa100 engine for 203M dollars.

@@cladarreonbattle3587 My flying aircraft carrier is a blimp. It runs on a hybrid of solar and jet engines. I designed it to be as fast and effeicent as possible! But what would it be without weapons It's fully armed with Cannons, Anti aircraft missiles, and Flares!!

@@cladarreonbattle3587 It's a solar hybrid blimp It's designed specificly for this jet!!

Too expensive to maintain compared to competitors. Also reliability issues (due to its complexity).

well... modern jets are not like the F14s or even F4s of that eras... everything is just a lot more complex... and classified too...

@@Morphinem no not really, they are cheaper by the day, cheaper than Gripen now

@@Morphinem the plane alone is now down to 75mil$ USD per jet for the USA and about 78-83mil for partner development countries for the A model.
Btw the gripen E is about 83 to 88 mil for the plane alone.
Last i checked the the F15 EX is in the same range.
Yes some details require more attention.

@@Morphinem this is what happens when people listen to the media without their pwn research. if you ha done you research you would knw that becuase this fighter is so popular this has ineviebaly drastically reduced its maintenance costs. as of right now it probably one of the most cost effective options for its battlefield control.

And in such a relatively short timespan

Isn’t it a shame that all that ingenuity and resources are poured into a weapon of war.

@@CptSpears007 it surely is

@@CptSpears007 I used to think the same until I understood sometimes it's necessary just for the appearance; that if a certain country decides to mess with us they know they can get destroyed so they'd rather not and keep the peace, unlike if the USA seemed defenseless.

@@CptSpears007 Weapons have always been the focus of human ingenuity

Not sure what this has to do with age. It has always been hated by "online specialists" to this very day. You will still find people who say its a waste of money and complete trash.
Some will never learn.

The F-16 had a turbulent and drawn out development cycle too as they kept adding more things they expected it to do. Thankfully for the F-16, it wasn't developed during the time of the internet so the hate piling was far less obvious. Now it's considered one of the best multirole fighter aircraft ever built, and the F-35 looks like it's on its way to being the next generation of that once we really start to see them in action.

f35 can't fly during thunderstorms and it's a Jack of all trades master of none this thing is doomed to fail in combat just wait

old sub tech eh

I was one that heard nothing but problems, until I started researching last year and discovered how insanely incredible the F-35 is. Absolute game changer!

It's stealth is so good

yea, they have to add small bumps onto the jet so that it can be tracked

​@@hoangdaniel4433imagine being so good that you have to be handicapped just so your maker can track you, now that's a great airplane

they left a couple of airtags in, just in case

Task failed successfully

Totally

I actually miss the blueprint explanation sometimes 🥲

Absolutely I was here before 10K subs

I honestly couldn't tell whether some of the CGI was real or not.
The animation of all the fans twisting and turning was perfection.
And your team even used nice touches such as depth of field in some of the scenes that could have easily just been a flat 2D graphic.
This makes me want to get back into doing 3d.

Are you saying that all the animations were done by Real Engineering, and not taken from the manufacturer? If so it’s quite impressive 👍

The solution to these problems is infinite money

@@VincentHondius the US military budget...

@@BilalAhmad-ff3xq which is fueled by infinite amounts of money

And it now costs less per unit than older 4th generation fighters like the Eurofighter or F-15EX.

@@AirShark95 gotta keep countries supplied with American arms even if it loses money

yes, but keeping the 4th gen jets on the side, which have a much smaller cost per flight hour and higher availability is a good option when you don't operate in a very contested airspace like Irak. The F35 is of course a lot ahead of these though.

​@@filippopotame3579looking forward, I think most of our wars are going to be in contested airspace. China specifically.
Having a plane that is so driven by stealth and situational awareness is what's going to keep it relevant long term, not how tight of a circle it can turn.

And then when the F-15 came out they were saying it's "unnecessary" and "overcomplicated". Man, the fighter jets Mafia is hilarious.

It would have been cheaper...
But, like all aircraft, every delivery breeds more requirements.
This many units, at this capability, is this price. When you ask for more development, on a finished product, the cost skyrockets. The whole design has to be broke down, re-optimzed, and most times drastic changes must be made to support the new requirements.
Add in another 5000-20000 manhours of the best engineers, trying to make it all fit, finding out, if we put this here, that goes bad.
Now your coffee pot adds 5 miles of wire, 1000 more connections, sub assemblies must be redesigned, the manufacturing procces gets overhauled, again, another 20000 manhours at the highest level. 1000000's of man hours trickle down, material costs are boundless.
What does it cost to design and forge a bulkhead? What about five versions so grandad can have his coffee pot, and a lighted shave mirror?
Oh now it costs more so we want less. Economy of scale is killed at every opportunity. Unit cost goes up.
Turns out we need a sink to service the coffee pot, and shave mirror, wait, don't we need a razor holder???
Now it costs more, so we want less units...

There's a reason why Chinese military simulators used to develop their own technology just sets American equipment to "practically invincible" and then they go from there.

I choked reading this 😂😂

Nice! Stick with it. As a current aerospace engineer and former student who has worked in the industry now for fifteen years, I appreciate the insane amount of work that you are going through right now. Trust me, it will all be worth it!

I am as well 😂. Good luck for the end of your studies we'll go through it 😁

same,
good luck bro

enjoy it while you can because you'll all be replace by ME's

Russian and Chinese copycats: 😃✍📃

2nd to none!

Yeah , so informative an accurate 😂plain with operational radius just over 1000 km flies in Russia aerospace for 6000 , and not even planing to turn back home …

@@dmitriyskvortsov9650 You ok bro? seems a little rough with English, what are you trying to say?

Its pretty nice, but i wouldnt say incredible. The 3D model is quite low poly and they didnt bother re-meshing it so they can subdivide for the close-up shots, so lots of visible polygons. The textures are also wrong, there are decals that say "NO STOP" when infact they should say "NO STEP". Still, way above youtube quality average ;)

@@dmitriyskvortsov9650 where's your Su-35's in Ukraine? Cope russian bot

and underrated

I could talk options that make it look Red Baron. and I'm not talking pizza Sherlock

aerospace is approached like cancer cures, tweaking where the budget left off

It doesn't get the funny trading card numbers, but it turns out the most important stuff happens to be the things people find too boring to put on the trading cards. Like, actually knowing who the heck is shooting at you

The problem is they have had to spend over a decade fixing it.
It's like comparing a release day AAA videogame that can barely function and has a mountain of laughable problems to one that's been out for 5 years and received about 5,000 patches. It's in fine shape now - great even - but it sure wasn't the case at launch.. it's the No Man's Sky of aircraft.

LOLLLLLLLLL

Stealth mode at its best. 😂 An airplane that cannot be spotted even by its own airforce..

Unnecessary 25 minutes of pro USAF propaganda.

so u are saying it can go failsafe? nice try

Right, because out of the 1000 F-35s we have we lost one on a training mission because of human error. Man, you reformers are stupid.

No. It is engineered. No "crazy" or "insane" needed.

And simple ideas as well, amazing

@@AlanTheBeast100 oh shut the hell up

@@AlanTheBeast100 Ok grampa

@@AlanTheBeast100 You need help go and see someone before it's too late.

He explained it so well Russia and China should use it as an introduction to stealth aircraft! I learned a lot I thought I would never know. Fantastic and entertaining

@@Greg-yu4ij I mean this is all Public knowledge. And even if they do manage to reverse engineer the f-35, it’s one thing to design something and make a prototype out of it. It’s a totally different thing to be able to mass manufacture it like the US.

@@apex_blue To add to that, the coating on the F-35 plays rather strongly into its low observable nature, and that stealth is largely what makes it a Gen 5 fighter. While the geometry alone helps with its signature (as the MQ-28 Ghost Bat can attest), the special sauce is quite literally in the paint recipe.
Edit: Though, to be fair to Greg, he did just phrase it as "introduction to stealth aircraft", which this video sort of can be. Though both nations mentioned undoubtedly know anything covered here, already.

@@ElodieFiorella oh yeah the Chinese will never get our paint recipes... NOT. Only one guy I know of ever tried to stop them stealing all our secrets. The rest take their money

except he doesn't bring up a single negative point. like the massive production cost, 3x of any fighter before it. or that it's worse at every single task compared to a dedicated plane for that function.

It’s been the most maligned of the 3 variants but may become the most valuable. With Marine Littoral regiments they can spread F-35B’s all across the Philippines and keep China contained within the first island chain.

@@karlkobler218 not to mention that the British and the Italians use the B variant for our carriers.

I know Im not even anywhere close to an engineer or even engineering student. But the vertical take off and landing immediately reminded me of marvel movies too. I can't even imagine how useful that is. Not to mention the other areas where the technology could be applied in the future. Its like Im living in the future.

Vertical flight and hovering was introduced in the 80s.. the f35b just made it even better

Amazing plane for sure, but it didn't feel as revolutionnary to me as the F22 or the B2. The VTOL and head mounted display were quite revolutionnary for sure.

And the dark projects not available to see

I'd rather have universal Healthcare, but yeah it's cool seeing the stuff the US Military is capable of making.

Are you from NCD?

@@sushmag4297We can do both. Universal healthcare is cheaper than the system of price gouging we have now.

Merica love it

I agree. Smart man who puts in real work. Great presentation skills!

He is just reciting the tech info that is no longer classified.

@@jqmachgunner2577 That's kind of harsh, don't you think?

@@Roughdog86 It is a good presentation of old non-claasified derails. They did leave out the latest non-classified additions for the F-22 and F-35.

@@jqmachgunner2577 well what do you expect you dork, ya think he's gonna start spouting off classified specs about the F-35? Use your brain.

I believe this is the stuff you're referring to.
krplus.net/bidio/ccmJdpGomKawipw

Sounds like something the British did tbh

Same thing as flares against traditional heat seeking missiles pretty much.

If I remember correctly, it was simpler than a speaker. They were just some metal bars that would clang together to produce noise as they were dragged through the water behind the ship.

If the movie “Greyhound” is accurate, it looks like German U-boats used a similar technique. This video is showing A LOT more capabilities of this plane, A LOT MORE, than I’ve seen anywhere else! They are great capabilities, but that radar jammer that the pilot can reel out is about the most crazy thing I couldn’t even begin to imagine a jet fighter having! So my next question is, once deployed, can the pilot reel it back in?

I will always have a spot in my heart for the Harrier.

​@@chrissmith7669
Ditto. From Ahnold 'piloting' one in "True Lies" to seeing them perform at an airshow as a child (and as an adult).

what is music to me is the C17 and hearing the Pratt & Whitney's grown as their harmonic balance is pushed to the limit up their approach to landing at Andrews. Dream all you want. It is still propulsion. Cage go in the water. Shark in the water. Our Shark.

@@ruthnoya8424 I saw the British precision harrier flying group practice at the airfield where I was stationed. They ripped the piss out of our apron but we loved it.

Yeah, I was wondering where he got all these information from, it's amazing all that is known if u know where to look!

@@dragonfire2371 this is just information that is publicly available. The plane has much more advance concepts that makes it as stealthy and advanced and that is well protected. The serrations are widely known, the paint composition is a secret and the software and IOT that makes this plane shine are well hidden.

What's made public now is what was cutting edge 20 years ago. You better believe that the real cutting edge tech of today is well hidden... in plain sight.

I worked for DAARPA for a bit after my Naval Career. I feel like i just recieved a TOP SECRET, CODE WORD, Numbered release EYES ONLY briefing in the Basement of the Pentagons Missing Ring Quiet Rooms.

Is this the professional diving F35?

Can you answer in more detail?

Don’t encourage him.

@@GardenGuy1943 wym lol

Lol

It seems you may not be as well informed as you had thought xD

only the upper 10% are able to perceive the technology -define intelligencia

You are now being followed by all of China!!!! Do not read this comment or all your classified information will be sent to China, North Korea, Russia, and more!!!!! lol

By 40 or 50 years the Ai will have instructed the jets to kill us all.

@CockOfJustice lmfao. You'll have to wait just like everybody else. There's information that even those of us working in these jets are not privy to.

How's the mpg compared to a Camry?

@@literallyhuman5990 less

Yes NGAD and FAXX Air force and Navy new 6th Gen planes are being worked on as we speak and the F22 program has been canceled and will retire

@@rosevitelli5814 what i'd give to test one of these things

Yes there is more advanced stuff being developed.
However don't overestimate how advanced it is.
There are two big things that are overlooked when speculating about military tech. First, is that most of the tech used by the military is civilian developed, usually by research universities and labs. Sure the particular military application of the technology is often novel to the military but the core underlying principles governing it are not.
Second manufacturing is the most challenging part not design.
Many technologies exist that we don't use; not because they wouldn't be useful but because they are just too hard to make at scale (yet). This also means that the most top secret technologies the military hold are the ways that the equipment is manufactured rather than the idea for the equipment itself.
You can easily see this in videos like Smarter Every Day's tour of the ULA rocket factory. The most prominent thing they censored was a tool head on a fabrication machine. Yet all the parts of the rocket can be seen in plane sight.
When you keep that in mind its easy to see how the secret stuff we don't know isn't actually that diffrent than what we do know when it comes to the types of technology involved. It's just the particular flavor of execution thats hidden.

Yes it's called NGAD, the first 6th Gen fighter it will be in production later this decade with an estimated cost of several hundred million per plane. NGAD seats up to 3 pilots, has 100 times more stealth than the F35, controls a fleet of drones and uses lazer weapons, it is a dual engine design capable of Mach 3-4cruising. Based on this leaked information, NGAD is more of a Spaceship than a jet

@@nocare I see the point you're getting at, but by the same logic one could argue that the F-35 isn't all that advanced because it's based on principles which were discovered just after the turn of last century by civilians. It's just the manufacturing techniques which are advanced. :)
It kind of feels like arguing a distinction without a difference, at least as far as the layperson is concerned. As a similar example, there have been a multitude of applications for lasers and IR-frequency energy sources in civilian and military service for many decades now but as far as the vast majority of the population is concerned, such things are still basically magic. Which makes the "particular flavor of execution" required to put directed-energy weapons/countermeasures into 6th Gen fighters seem like straight up Sci-Fi. I've been deeply interested in military and civilian aviation since I was a young teen, and some of it sounds like straight up Sci-Fi even to me. And this is just hardware I'm talking about, haven't even touched on all the Code Magic going on inside the many black boxes. :)

That's all?

00:00 intro :)

You know its a useless timestamp list when they're barely a minute apart at the longest.

@@sleazymeezy It is a nice list of featured features though.

May i know what WAD is?

That's awesome, you deserve to be proud of that!

That’s actually pretty sick tbh.. mind me asking what your role was in the dev of it?

One was F-35a and one was a F-35c

I wish I could have been there for that.

then why is the U.S. done with them? they're already phasing them out cause it still has all kinds of problems. colossal waste of money.

Same I got to see Major "Beowulf" demonstrate the F-35A at the 2022 Andrew's Air Expo. I knew it was a badass plane but watching her pitch the plane up and slow to "less than 80mph" (which is what I think the announcer said) was an awe inspiring moment.

More like the insanely bad engineering of the F-35B

Basically any ship with a helicopter deck can be retrofit to launch one of the most advanced stealth fighters in existence.

which allows the US to build more small carriers and have an even more flexible Navy.

@FabrisFanatic So you mean aircraft could launch just fine from carriers that were only 4m longer back in the WW2 days and NOT need multi-billion dollar engines to make them behave like helicopters so they could?

@@plica06 it’s the landing that they will use the hover for more. Allowing decks to be free for other planes launching .

@@plica06 Pretty sure that the VTOL technology is what allows it to take off from a 258m deck. 13:30

Serious question - was YAK141 ever considered, taken as "inspirational" for this fighter jet? It was Russia first and world best (raw performance) JTOL abandoned since they had 2 aircratf carriers but only one was left to Russia one was given to Ukraine.. and they sold it to China. So Russia abandoned JTOL plans in favour of Su27/35. I cant resist to think F35 is mariage of F22 and YAK141.

​@JoeTuber harrier jet came before it.
This wasn't russias first JTOL or VTOL wtf are you on about.
No the f35 did not take any inspiration. They are completely different.
"But my side intakes!!!"
"But the way it uses thrust on the side!"
Wow thats crazy, not the the first side by side intake jet and completely different thrust systems.

@@KabelkowyJoe Lockheed was the financial backer for the Yak-141 program, when it was shutdown, they took inspiration and experience with them for the X/F-35. it not a copy but Lockheed improve upon it, all the similarity is the VTOL that is similar but not the same.

It was ahead of its time for sure

Fine British engineering. The F-35 is a worthy American successor.

Harrier pioneers VTOL, insanely advanced for it’s time. F35 revolutionizes this by adding Stealth and increasing payload and hover time capabilities

@@BrapBrapDorito not to mention supersonic capability.

@@craigkingdon4424 Supercruising supersonic capabilities too

Give it up. It’s not working anymore. The word is out. The Russian propaganda isn’t working anymore.

they have 2 MILLION views. They are a actual company. It's not a small team. The creators just do research at this point.

3d renders can be mighty impressive.. but that doesn't help at all with the beyond absurd list of category 1 flaws aka UNFIXABLE and DEADLY alone that fatramys have..
Not to mention even the USAF with the idiot fanbois and retiring staff LHM has promised cushy jobs out the wazoo has had to admit that the 35 is a total FAILURE..

You didn't do extensive research then. You just watched base level stuff.

@@justinstrong9595 "I learned something here"
"Then you must have been basically uninformed before"
What an embarrassingly reductive, presumptuous and asinine take. I'm almost impressed by how you could get so pedantic to the point of coming across as genuinely dense, you absolute grey matter deficient killjoy. Wow.

@@satelliteprime I'm not a killjoy retard, this video was full of the most baseline information on the F-35 you could possibly obtain.

@@justinstrong9595 Exactly

Russia will smoke these hunks of junk

Cringe

simp

Video was stupid good. Just.... stupid good.

The ego on this guy

@tom billiard canvas. It was a canvas biplane.
also, without the an-2, there wouldn't have been the an-225.
well... "had been" now

I had no idea about the pod that deploys behind it

@@memelephant
Agreed ... wtf?
Never encountered that before.

why do you plane nerds always have to be so insufferable

I once did some service work on a gas detection system at one end of a hanger at Williamtown RAAF base north of Sydney, home of No. 81 Wing which operates the F-35.
Australia was just starting to receive them from the states at the time, and at the other end of the hanger was some kind of facility operated by the local arm of Lockheed. Two 40ft containers with some hefty power cables and aircon units, various workstations up against the back wall and semi-concealed from view, piles of heavily secured crates. All of it behind two rows of chain-link fencing with some fairly unfriendly looking blokes standing guard. We were escorted of course, and we were strongly advised not to wander too far in that direction when coming/going from the bathroom, not to talk to anyone who might be coming or going from over there, and to avoid even looking over that way too much lest somebody get the wrong idea. Needless to say, my curiosity was aroused but I did exactly what I was told!

I'm concerned that the USA's adversaries will garner too much info from a detailed video like this.

@@brahmburgers remember. to be a threat you need intent, Capability and access
if we give them all the info. they will marvel at it. but they can't make it
if we give them the plane. they have capaility but no intent to do us harm but also no access to make it. they still need the US and Lockeed to make it.
so someone like russia might have access and Intent, but Building something like this is FARRR beyond them.
so we sell the plane to our allies. keep the Details from everyone else. and Never give the plane to our enemies.
you also forget the timeline on these things. the f35 is 10 Years old at this point. in 10 years where do you think defence tech has moved the goal is to stay ahead. so china russia might have 2-10 of their own. but they are building them on the bleeding edge of what they can do. and they can't make alot of them.. the US on the other hand. to the MIC the speed at which they can build these jets is nothing short of amazing.

And if this is what we know, imagine what they have progressed to already that we don't know

@@brahmburgers If the intelligence agencies of adversarial nation states have to rely on youtubers just to find publicly available information the US has nothing to worry about lol.

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ 500/100 Absolutely RIGHT! I agree with text 500%

One of the videos from Binkov's Battlegrounds mentioned the towed decoy (though the first of his videos to bring up the subject said that the F-35 didn't have one - a weakness compared to 4th generation jet fighters)

The Insane Engineering of the F-35B

We often don't appreciate how crazy the F-35B is. All you have to do is take one look at the X-32 to see just how difficult it is to do all the things the F-35B was expected to do.

Seems you also watched it on KRplus 😛

krplus.net/bidio/fpWSkXSneG-bhJQ

Its not a youtube vid, its corporate sponsored promotional advisement. Welcome to the wonderful world of the pharma arms and informational complex that is this society.

@@febeomnibeepboop6367 promotional advertisment for what? the military? what does pharma have anything to do with it?

@@strikewave1918 lol, the correct question would be, what is the militarily industrial complex and how is it intricately connected to the rest of the major institutes and entities in the world resulting in a complete hegemony ?
Considering the recent economic workings FED actions etc etc, you should be having a hunch right about now unless you are still 16 and havent experienced enough to realize.

Getting the 'unparalleled' situational awarness with hud in the helmet is already an old technology that existed for decades now, a F16 pilots in the 90's could already lock AA targets just by looking at them. Datalink is also an old tech. Well most of the F35 techs are pretty old and overpriced... Did you said it was by far the best military tech you've seen ?

​@@drafura No I said it’s the best military tech VIDEO I’ve seen. I was praising the information presented by Real Engineering, not trying to start a childish debate about which fighter plane sucks, like you are. Learn to read!

Make sure to give them back or at least not hide them next to your corvette

And this is just what's released to the public....

aka reading through the War Thunder forums

So you play War Thunder? xD

@@volvo09 that was what I was thinking while watching this video. If this is what is put out in the public, the classified tech must be way more insane!

hows the mpg compared to a civic

@@krovi8111 very bad

I mean no disrespect but what's your response to these gentlemen krplus.net/bidio/ndx8hZmpo4SWn6g krplus.net/bidio/aM-rpYqnk2-xh5Q

Did you get to fly in its simulator?

​@@krovi8111apparently the f35b uses about 4kg of fuel per km, which is pretty oof

Absolutely.

How is it game changing? What specifically will change about the "game"?

Sure it's a cool plane, but it's also a ridiculous use of taxpayer's money

@@EdwardM104 Lol no, it secures America and our allies' dominance for decades to come. One of the best uses of taxpayer money.

@@superhenkable Because it links the data the F-35 receives from its own systems and shares it seamlessly with other assets in the AO.
For one example, the US has already run a test where a PATRIOT air defense missile system was able to fire a missile and hit a target that it could not see with its own radar because there was an F-35 that WAS able to see it with its radar and send the data in real time to the PATRIOT.
Another application is the F-35 doing much the same with aerial assets. For instance, the new F-15EX is what's called a "missile truck". It isn't stealthy, but it can carry far more missiles than the F-35 can. What the F-35 can do is fly ahead of the F-15EX into airspace the F-15 would not be able to survive in, designate targets, send the data to the F-15, which can then fire its entire payload and score kills even though its own radar cannot actually see what it is firing at. The missiles will fly true because the F-35's radar is linked into their data system and is guiding them to target.
A final application is close on the horizon with the Loyal Wingman program the US is developing. Basically, it allows the F-35 to function as an entire squadron. It serves as the controller for an entire formation of combat UAVs it flies with. These UAVs carry their own munitions that the F-35 pilot can fire at whatever target they chose, and the drones will even maneuver to take a missile for the F-35 that it cannot evade or spoof. This also allows the F-35 to be far more versatile, as the UCAVs will be able to carry a mix of both anti-air and anti-ground munitions.
So yeah, those are all revolutions in how aerial warfare will play out going forward and I haven't even scratched the surface. But no other plane on Earth has those capabilities.

"People can hate it"
But those people are idiots.

and to think, it was only JUST over 100 years ago that we _started_ being able to fly! Absolutely amazing

"A single one of these F-35s could defeat an entire medieval kingdom easily."
Except they only hold four missiles and can't fly more than a few hours without refueling.

@@wisenber Except against an enemy that has nonexistent anti-air it can carry more bombs than an A-10 by using wing pylons. And stop liking your own comments.

@@brilobox2 "it can carry more bombs than an A-10 by"
Which makes up to 12 and a couple of hours of flight time prior to refuel. Maybe you could ask the kingdom to all pile close enough together to make it easier for a few 500 lb bombs to wipe them out?
"And stop liking your own comments."
Stop pretending I did.

@@wisenber Medieval kingdoms are far smaller and weaker than the ancient empires that preceded them.
All you have to do is assasinate a couple families, demonstrate your very real command over a litteral flying metallic dragon and Bob's your uncle, Fanny's your aunt; presto!
Want to keep what you conquered though?
Yeh, probably want to get at them shales and quarries pronto!

And even the slow thing isn't that true, and the dogfight thing isn't true. During both Gulf wars despite fighting against Mig-25's some of the fastest jets out there not a single American jet exceeded Mach 1.3 and the F-35 can do 1.6 going faster just isn't necessary or desirable. And as far as dogfighting this thing can do some crazy shit, the only report that shows it can't dogfight was a flight characteristics test plane that had software in place to prevent it from doing any higher g maneuvers and it wasn't fitted with the actual radar either so it couldn't turn or lock on properly. The real deal F-35's are according to most pilots the most responsive planes they've ever flown, and the software in conjunction with the airframe allows it to do maneuvers previously only possible with thrust vectoring. This is a tight ship

F-35 doesn’t need to be faster or better in a dog fight than the f22
The f22 is for going and taking out enemy air craft
The f35 is for stealth missions
It’s sooo small and it has such a long range for shooting and hitting targets that it can kill anything from dozens of miles away before they even know the f35 is there
They essentially made a jet that is a marksman vs a dog fighter
It’s like someone with a scoped king rifle vs someone with a machine gun
As long as you are so far that you can see them and they can’t see you(which will be most scenarios in modern areal battles) then the f35 bears anything
Imagine all of a sudden your radar goes off and there’s a missile com if straight for you and you only have 2 seconds to react
Yeah top speed and dog fights no longer matter

Absolutely

I'm concerned that the USA's adversaries will garner too much info from a detailed video like this.

@@brahmburgers don’t worry about it, any country that could pose the threat of building anything 1/10 of the capability already has much much more info about the plane than this or any public video or dataset. Their problem isn’t only information, but also engineering and production capabilities

@@brahmburgers this is probably only the declassifed info too

Same with the Osprey. It had a lot of crashes in testing and people think it's a failure whereas the Marines love them and use them every day with no problems but people don't follow up to see how it all actually turns out.

Insane initial cost but damn did it payoff.
The most advanced 5th gen jet and now it costs less than a 4.5 gen Gripen

The F-35B was technically the most challenging variant to design. Its nothing short of a miracle that Lockheed pulled it off. They had many problems with too much weight but they somehow did it

I began to respect it and it's capabilities more, now seeing that the expense and length of development is actually justified

@tom billiard really

it cant fly near storms

@Czeckie small trade off, after all it would be a strategic risk to attack while there is a storm in the battlefield

@@Czeckie that issue was fixed like 7 years ago lmfao

@@Czeckie false

And how primitive Russia's and China's planes are.

Vectored thrust for vertical takeoff is a complete waste and renders the aircraft useless. The AV-8 Harriet never lived up to anything, it was a fatal joker. Why waste all that capacity to take off from a small deck: stupid! The tax payers are being fleeces again. The future is in autonomous drones, missile and Lazer technology. The human borne fighter is a thing of the past.

@@mcgch46e80 I'm sure you know best.