Why Do Deep Sea Creatures Evolve Into Giants?

Brothers...the glories of this world is great, but do not forget the eternal, everlasting glory of kingdom of the righteous king, Yahweh. Righteous God, in your grace, may these lost children return to you. Amin!

​@@jpraise6771 No way Shin Megami Tensei??????????????????

@@jpraise6771 Amen

Praise Yashewa! If you are virgin man come to yellow deli@@jpraise6771

@@jpraise6771 Praise Moloch.

Ewwww

Why take one slice when, you can swallow the entire cake?

dont overeat boii

Sometimes we just 🍃😮‍💨 and eat too much man

@@SUPERNOVA0360 did the dog not give you enough attention?

Subnauticaaaa

As long as there is a digital screen separating me from those leviahtan class organisms, then yeah, worth it ! 😂

@@riderpsychopate I mean… we haven’t really explored down there…

@@minemasterSAMwhere ? In Uranus ?

Did all of humanity get smited down by god? Lol I didnt get the ending

​@@kelsey2333 Wouldn't that be wonderful if God did it? Because it would be fair and not arbitrary. I would raise my hands to heaven and shout:" OMG, I can't believe it's you! I sorted my trash every time! I used public transportation!" And he'd be like:" Ew! Atheist! Obviously going to hell!"

@@christianpetersen163 just claim you are a real christian. get him on the loophole.

This is comedic level material 😂

​@@kelsey2333 I think k it would referring to mass nuclear war, i.e. the thousands of shockwaves

You should have taken Dutch and his plans with you to Tahiti as well

@@renks7112 you beat me to it😡

@@renks7112 got me giggling

You’ve made dutch sad

@@renks7112 Y'all are referencing something I either don't know or forgot about lol. What's this about?

MN h ju

john mayer’ed

Fish have organs that fill with air for them to go up and deflate to sink.

@@baguettewithcheese3880 Sure, but their _experience_ of gravity would be totally different. Humans tend to think of gravity in terms of things going down. A fish - being more concerned with buoyancy in any case - would probably think of gravity in terms of things going up.

buoyancy, i wonder how high can u reach into the skies and drop a nuke into the ocean, how deep it can penetrate before buoyancy affects it from going any deeper then detonates, whats the impact or reach the blast can go further down the ocean..i wonder if any of that is ever measured?... i assume a missile shot downwards in the ocean is no different to a submarine diving to the deepest depths that bouyancy and pressure stops it from continue to dive down?

Genuine question, then why did they develop sight in the first place

it's technically still a shark. ​@@paranoidastronaut5792

completely agree

I honestly came to the comments to type essentially the same thing you have! I am glad I am not the only one who notices the amount of effort put into these videos. And after watching a few others too, man I appreciate it. Hope they get to read this and it makes their day. Keep up the fantastic work!!! (And) yes I know my name looks spammy. Tis just for security.

If the aging is slower, then does this mean a reproductive cycle's length is larger? Then does this mean that they did not undergo too much of an evolution? Then does this mean that birth of life on earth can be traced back from them, cuz you know the should've survived meteors and stuff? Then are the prehistoric?

@@bern_stock8946 that would be the natural conclusion. If I recall correctly Greenland shark reaches sexual maturity at age 150. So indeed EVERYTHING is slower.

Hahahah oh common man..u also live under water and all of us..its our soul..and by the way birth and death only happens with the command of the almighty supreme lord...everything happens with lord’s command..its hard to digest this talk but its reality the truth..and if u wanna know this by yourself then look inside u(spiritual heart,space),like where our consciousness rest during sleep,over there when its stay conscious or awake then u gonna find all the answers..even which science never ever gonna get..

@@sukhvirjhajj2619 I would suggest to take a look more into engineering books than new age. It is possible for every system (yes, biological too) to just shutdown and be on stand by. This is what dreams are. You do not remember all your dreams. It does not mean that you do not dream every night. This is where your consciousness goes

@@sukhvirjhajj2619 there is no God, only Glibbus the Crab

Don't think so. Eyes aren't an evolutional advantage down there, so they will develop backwards to save energy. Animals down there are probably almost blind and have other senses developed. Compare it to moles, they are almost blind too and have no problem with day light. It just wouldnt make sense for a sea creature down there to have that sensitive eyes as other senses will take over

I thought the same, I was uncomfortable seeing the camera flash in their eyes

Which is why most of the time they use red lights, enough for us to see, but not enough to harm the critters. White light only used for filming purposes.

Which is also odd because normally evolution favors use it or lose it and there isn't enough light down there to even use it majority of the time so I would expect them to lose it
But if it became more sensitive that's understandable too, but less if they simply enhance other senses and lost their eyes

@@saosaqii5807 it doesn't necessarily have to be more sensitive. Although they are due to the size of the organs involved. Keep in mind they are hunting animals with bioluminesence.

Right. I appreciate when they're right at the beginning or right at the end.

as she said, living in the cold dark waters, moving slowly, burning almost no energy, starting mating when 150yrs old and completely blind all their life because someone is nibbling at their eyes. not a particularly pleasant fate

Same

@@embreis2257 I wouldn't necessarily extrapolate from our experience to those of other creatures. You could say the same thing about a mole. Isn't it disgusted having to live below ground, eating worms all day, being almost blind? Does the mole say to itself every day: Oh I wish I was a rabbit above ground, I could eat green grass all day and see the sun shining? Probably not. A mole evolved to be that way, it doesn't know anything but that life, and it doesn't have the mental capacity to envision something different for itself. I don't think it is unhappy.
Having said that, the Greenland shark probably could do without the parasites, even though it doesn't rely on eyesight all that much. Still, parasites suck.

@@tamatebako_yt parasites suck and so do most people we all loathe, but like parasites we need them for something - right? lol

@@carrickdubya4765 no… not really lol

This is my favorite topic too

The "Natural World Facts" channel also has an interesting video about deep see gigantism among other fascinating subjects.
Although this video is more complete

@@Pridefallen975 Science is nice, buuuut...
I see Disinterest. Im sorry to see many not much interest in being Updated, let alone fighting-back
against Extremism. I fear not many people even watched the video 'Marjorie Taylor Greene
Has DEEPLY Disturbing Views'.

O

😱

Is this COOL or DROOL? I think IT'S POOP and PEE and that he's a FOOL and MORAN!!!

Yeah I love her voice

Yes ,
But her voice is not verry pretty especially one the end of a sentence.

@@lolbajset it's piercing the ear, need a deep calming voice, Attenborough esque

@@henryrooyakkers8510 weird thing to say

Giant Squid: "I swear bro I was abducted by aliens from those ships with weird lights. They took me up there and experimented on me!".

And yet we still see human out there fishing (I’m not talking about the ones who live as fisherman or fish monger) , laughed about it, posted it online because while the fish is dying, didn’t even count the fact that it got hook on their mouth
i also heard about the fact and that people talked about dolphins are literally human but live in the ocean, rape, torture, play with their prey etc..
Now that I look back here at us, I can’t look at those people the same way anymore

dont the creatures communicate by using flashing lights from their body

@@FreightmareFTW Dude this is a video on the ocean-

@The Siamese humans may have grown less cruel over these thousands of years. but we still once where in these positions and that we killed each other just to survive.We are lucky that we aren't in such positions nowadays.

I feel called out…

omg, same here! it's scary and amazing at the same time for me

exactly man, its impossible to just watch forever

Dang I thought I was the only one

act. my guys chur NOTZ alone in tis & chur purrfectwy normals the answer tu chur comments ish called thallasaphobia witch ish the fear of the deep dark ocean and wike myself as i have it 2 its a common phobia many ppl have :3

They're fascinating but I'd be creeped the hell out if I saw their 30cm human-like eyes just staring at me.

If aliens ever visited they'd likely not be arsed for us humans. They'd probably want to study the squids and deep sea creatures. They seem to be much more advanced than us

@@markroyds23 lol what? Squids are not the ones going to space as far as i recall, how are they " more advanced "

@@thomasprent2179 Deep sea creatures provide more insight into efficiencies for space travel than land creatures do.

human exceptionalism is wack but dont lie to yourself @@markroyds23

They make me want to just pick them off. That can’t be comfortable to swim with. I guess evolutionarily speaking, when you have no need for eyes, eye parasites are more of an annoyance than a death sentence

#gogglesforgreenlandsharks

@@The_Bearded_Lion Finally, a hashtag I can get behind

​@@wil.d_sage fr, I support this

It was 40 calories per WEEK, lol

Two apples a day keeps the doctor away, for a month.

I'd rather it sits still and wait rather than actively swim and hunt us down.

ABSOLUTELY! i wonder all the time how large a fully grown magnapinna squid are

@@karmy1317 60ft to 75ft

New title of the video: Evolving into muslims

You got confused by wikipedia omg. Yes wikipedia said all bigfin squids (magnapinna) confirmed are babies, the one we see in the videos are adults. They aren't babies. They are the adults, the reason wikipedia says that is because we haven't confirmed whether these *adults* are bigfin squids, the same species as those babies

​@@zKrazeM8 .... What

I can agree, they are really cool sharks, and are also in my top 5 favorite fish. My favorite fish has got to be the gulper catfish though, as they have such a unique biology, and they look like they belong in the deep sea, even though they reside in the rio negro. Gulpers are so unique, as they can eat fish twice their own size, and they are able too because of their expandable belly, much like an angler fish. They are also very strong and of course, nocturnal… i guess that’s why they remind me of a deep sea creature so much. I actully had a gulper catfish, and he was my first fish. I was so fascinated by their biology that I spent hours just watching him swim around. Also, it is so interesting How Greenland sharks live up to 500 years or more, though. I’ve heard of some that have lived till 700!

@Beautiful world I mean,you can feed a lot of people with them.

@Beautiful world but I mean there definitely aren’t enough of them to go around eating them

@@moderndemon84 Lol or you can just become a snack for it 🥶🥶🥶

@@SoupyMittens You never know,there might be enough for everyone.

That's why the most intelligent life at the bottom hides and we have never seen it. Humans are too easy to detect.

yea it sucks but photographers have found a way to not harm the animals. The deep sea cameras flash a red light which to most creatures isn't very visible. for example squids and octopuses, cant see blue or red. They see it as a shade of green, So the camera would look like a green dot appeared which won't harm them. That's why tigers are orange (shade of red) its because they will appear as a green blur to their prey

@@skellybonz5467 how are scientists able to find out what colors animals can see?

@@celestia7269 the perception of colour is determined by the presence of cells in the eye called cone photoreceptors. so basically we just took a animal then do scans of their eyes. And we look at the cells that are there. so with these scans scientists found out about what each animal can see. It’s also how we found out about if animals can see UV light.

@@skellybonz5467 wow, i always wondered how that worked! thank you for teaching me something new! ☺

magma worms.

We discovery new species almost everyday. They're just not so different from already known animals.

@@Mr.Nobody.19817 yeah, it astonishes me when people say "we've only saw 5% of the ocean" or "megalodon still exists in the deep sea who knows!" as an argument. We've got a pretty good idea of what kind of animal can subside in the deep sea. Small, slow and harmless animals who bare too much pressure and probably eat once a week due to scarce food.

They could be better

Me too. It annoys me that we don't get more info on cold seeps, black smokers, hot springs in the ring of fire, life under the ocean floor . . . There are so many energy sources down there, and then we have stuff drifting down from above as well, your marine snow, driftwood, whalefalls . . . and most of it is in places we haven't gone, or can't go.

@@johnchance7836 gotta be careful because the earth might split open when people start digging to far down and cause a real disaster like the 2012 movie . . .

@@carrickdubya4765 nahh We would have to nuke a huge volcano to cause anything close.

We wasting time in space when the deep sea has all the answers

@@kauciontheboss We should do both. Researching both will drive humanity forwards (space research is expensive and very long term investment, ocean is cheaper and shorter term) and i hope that as time goes by, we as the nr. 1 reason of the destruction of the world, will mature enough before starting to do any serious work in the ocean so we would not destroy it more.
Had humanity have the ability to mine the ocean floor 50 years ago, there would be absolutely nothing left today. Even today we have some chance to work down there with tolerable damages and in the future hopefully with zero or miniscule damages.

10 years ago KRplus had more documentaries available for free.

@@clivejd there is a difference between pirated and things like this video. Sure you are getting to watch them both for free but this content was meant to be free. There is a difference in intent.

This might seem free to you, but they do get paid in ad revenue

@@JCaleb reeeeeeeeeee. No one is saying they aren't getting paid. Its not behind a paywall like Netflix or any other paid streaming service. Please read before you write.

@@BrosMinecraft2 I repeat the same back to you. Nothing is free on KRplus, the paywall is your data and adsense

🥴aDhD duuuuhhh 🥴

Go and watch old black and white documentations. They rock.

@@LaCosaNostra_ are you stupid?

@@Ronasian 🤑

Omg same with me and my adhd haha it’s the first informative video I’ve been able to watch off my medication for months without meds I am badly stuck on shitty tv but this has held my attention thus far ! 🎉

😂 this happened then I read this comment once I woke back up

People are mostly watching tiktok😂.
That's what youtube algorithm shows.

Sorry my friend - you are likely a shill for this channel because it is total crap - zero scientific credentials. and obviously so. The writing isn't anywhere near how an educated person explains their field of expertise.
There are plenty of quality channels - but this is not one of them. She sounds like someone imitating what they imagine a scientist would say.

@@timsullivan4566 not a shill, just a guy on the internet 🤷🏼‍♂️

​@@citizenblue Said that because your articulate comment was at odds with the judgment it revealed.
-That is a joke of a channel - my point being that it is SO bad that I found it unlikely that one who could express themselves as you had could be so seemingly oblivious to that (imo) glaringly obvious fact. Anyway - sorry and feel free to enjoy what you choose.

@@citizenblue Just to explain a bit further - these type of channels are made with all kinds of stock of pretty stock footage loosly stitched together by a script written by unqualified amateurs. For instance - apart from the species mentioned, the extreme depths do NOT tend to foster gigantic creatures - in fact the exact OPPOSITE is true. - at extreme depths most animals are relatively tiny. The unmanned submersibles that collect specimens rarely snag anything over a few inches long. Huge creatures are much higher up in the water column where they can find he more plentiful food supplies their bulk requires. But iof you just look at the entire presentation, they say nothing you couldn't come up with after reading an entry in an encyclopedia. Fraudulent crap. ]
PBS has tons of free quality science material on KRplus. Take care and sorry for that comment ;-)

Anybody who enjoys this would also enjoy the "Children of Time" series by Adrian Tchaikovsky (specifically book 2).
Sci-fi; speculative biology, forced evolution, huge cryogenic induced time-skips and a tremendous emphasis on HOW non humans would communicate.

Yeah the deepest points in the ocean are my new favorite curiosity right now. It's like an alien world but right here on Earth.

@@TomCruz54321 There's a channel called EVNautilus that livestreams subs diving way down to look at the critters

We know nearly nothing about deep sea and it´s circle of life but we will happily destroy it for some raw materials.

@@TomCruz54321 Scientists here on Earth know more about the Moon and Mars than we know about our own oceans which seems so ridiculous to me on several different levels.

For me it was bit scary🥴

The place is Terrifying

magical place? you make it sound like disney, its probably the closest thing we have to hell LOL

I'm pretty sure most videos have real human voice overs.

@@olserknam its mostly ai

Life uh, finds a way.

@@AxisChurchDevotee the way of the drider and hog is the only way. HOOOOOOOOOOOGGGGGGGG DRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDAAAAAA

Annihilation is a great movie. The part near the end when the alien changes form is a real work of art.

@@virtual-adam YES! And the entire thing was a new type of Alien. It was not necessarily here to harm us. It just, "was." Have you seen Andromeda Strain? krplus.net/bidio/ibGahaCgnoazpXY

I will fight to the day I die that Annihilation was a stupid movie with stupid characters.
I cannot comprehend how sane or competent people could have caused the events that led up to the beginning of the movie.
I can think of 15 ways to send that Abhorrent Space Alien back to its Disgusting Alien God without setting a Single Human Foot inside the Zone.

Yeah exactly... 🙄
Humans again.

Planet??? 🤦🏻‍♂️🤣😂

The message at the end was preachy and unscientific, the delivery leaves a bitter taste behind.

@@alexanderwelker4464 talking about how we're destroying our planet isn't unscientific or preachy. it's a literal fact. if you don't like hearing about it, too bad.

@@Dcookies100 at best it's pseudoscience, the projections use the same modeling technology that have made the last 5 or so incorrect world ending projections. We've survived 3 global freezings and 2 global warmings at this point. We don't understand climate, we can barely predict the weather, a control model was once significantly off from where it was supposed to be due to an error in the data equal to the flapping of a butterflies wings. It is unknown if CO2 has a net warming efect as it effects many various things. It causes major plant growth which has a cooling efect, and it promotes Ozone growth wich blocks harmful radiation coming from the sun that would kill us otherwise.
Also the climates natural state is that of change, the planet used to be significantly hotter, where human life could only possibly survive at the poles. A time where the poles weren't frozen. We've also had several warming projections proven to be literal lies through cherrypicking the warmest areas and ignorimg the coldest areas to allow for a them to claim warming globally when the actual average was the same at the time the data was taken.
Arrogance and political partisanship keeps these climate theories from being effectively challenged by already known data that contradicts them. I've only listed the tip of the iceberg. It's unscientific calling it pseudoscience is being charitable.
How about instead of losing our minds about things we can't yet understand we focus on real tangible problems like waste polution for example. Instead we've turned a likely beneficial molecule into a boogey man and ignore the fact that we give China our waste who then dumps it with reckless disreguard for nature. We even demonize the cleanest form of energy that produces the most energy, nuclear power.

@@alexanderwelker4464 I'll respond to the last portion: yes I agree that we should focus on figuring out how to manage our waste and we should definitely ditch fossil fuels for nuclear energy. Plastic usage also needs to be focused on. Even just doing this three things would vastly, vastly improve things.

This is why Subnautica was such a hit video game!!

As far as we know.

@@eroero830 no we're aware of life in our solar system, and we're the only real habitable planet, and we've sent research vessels past all planets now.
That said!!! Universe is huge! And i really hope we find some more goldilocks planets and the life they might hold!

@@annice-4609 As far as we know.

@@eroero830 yes and our knowledge is quite high?? I'm not sure what ur trying to explain?

@@annice-4609 Our knowledge is quite high... as far as we know.

😱

Informative as hell? What does that mean?

​@@A8Y9Nit means that it's informative 😀

"Heebie jeebies of the highest order" made my day!

@@citizenblue Absolutely nailed it with that one

😱

I can't be more grateful to this as well.

very reddit indeed

@@churblefurbles lmfao what

Horrible naration

@@ka7al958 Horrible spelling