BEST OF THE MONTH (JANUARY) | UK Car Crashes Compilation | Idiots In Cars 1 Hour (w/ Commentary)
소스 코드
- 게시일 2023. 04. 09.
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamacademy.com/
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamacademy.com/submit...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
#7 doesn’t matter how quickly the mini stopped, the driver behind should be at a distance and speed to pull up as well, the mini had the right to stop especially as they might have been concerned about the person about to cross.
ha was thinking the same!
@@jbezzaplaysThe lights were on red, weren’t they?
I was going to post the same. The Mini obeyed the Highway Code, the sleepy head in the car behind wasn't looking at the road situation. It doesn't matter if the compiler considered that the Mini should have moved, or "not stopped". The law is the law. They stopped for the pedestrian, as per, and there was sufficient space for the following vehicle to brake, IF the sleepy blonde had been both driving and THINKING. And I just saw that the rear-ender was driving a TOYOTA, that doesn't say much about her intelligence. Never trust the driver of a Japanese or Korean vehicle.
The mini wasn't at fault at all. Amber light means stop.
@@winksongs yeah it's what I said, did you not read it correctly? However amber means stop if you can, red is actually stop.
#7 I think the mini was probably looking at the pedestrian thinking he was going to cross. Cammer too close and too fast anyway.
Cammer also should've been slowing down and preparing to stop since it was an amber light
Yes whoever edits these has a lot to learn about road rules. You never are legally able to go through a Red light.
It was a repeater light
Both vehicles went over the stop line, before the box junction and cycle box as the light went amber. The mini should not have stopped, the van driver should have stopped to avoid collision.
That light doesn't apply to them, mini was wrong to stop in the middle of the junction, but the cammer was too close and couldn't stop on time.
2:25 can we appreciate the music reaching its climax just as the cars crash 😂
The nurse driver clip and the car that hits the bollard clip are really old clips - I remember seeing them about 5 or more years ago, so how they can be in this Best of January 2023 is beyond me !
Whether the nurse driver is an old clip or not - that nurse needs to work in a trauma unit dedicated to Road Traffic Accidents for at least a month! THEN let her have her car back! I guarantee she will never drive like that clip again AND I guarantee if I was her Matron I'd have dismissed her the first time the clip was shown!
Whats the time stamp?
The amount of people on these videos who are using dashcams as a threat to other drivers when it's the cam driver that's at fault in a lot of cases
I agree with @ronniebrown, also the over use of the damn horn, its a bit late to use it after the event, especially when half the time you have caused it. I miss being on the roads, I gave up my car when I figured I could hurt someone if i continued, now I have a disability scooter, so not as dangerous, well, not to road users anyway, 😊 and have always encountered wonderful drivers who actually stop at zebra crossings, and yes I always thank them. And people stay well back from the lorries, the guys are great drivers , but there is always the one
20:30 is utterly shocking. The back of the container swinging round could easily have killed the pedestrian, I reckon.
To the lady in #120. Thank you for de-escalating. Please leave that bellend, you deserve much better.
Well said, she doesn’t deserve a prick
@@asparkdeity8717 Oh, I don't know! Looks like she deserves a large one to me!🤣
So many of these are so avoidable, in many cases even those that are not at fault can see the danger ahead and not take action to avoid collision
2:46, the mini stopped at the Amber because it was safe to do so, the cammer was clearly speeding and not keeping a safe distance from the vehicle in front.
In a few of these clips the cammer could have turned the incident into what Ashley Neal would call "A non-event"
1:55 the car pulling out had space for the car that was being overtaken, but the speeder caused that hazzard completely. The emerging car had started their manuver at the time when the speeder started theirs...
Exactly, the road racer 30mph breaker overtook on hatched markings and was coming from behind a centre island lamppost, which he swerved to avoid; the car pulling out couldnt have anticipated the overtake..... and the Highway Code warns abt overtaking nr T junctions
These are fun to watch and all, but nothing beats seeing somewhere you've been/live on these.
2:47 There can be no doubt that the Mini should not have stopped there, because there is no stop line there.
The stop line for that red light was crossed prior to the yellow box.
Yes. The red light is a repeater and there is no stop line. So it should have continued.
Still, majority of the blame goes to the cammer. The mini might have stopped for the wrong reason, but it's always up to the person behind to also stop *whatever* the reason the car in front stopped.
@@Larwood.: Agreed, you have to be travelling at a speed that allows you to stop within the distance you can see to be clear, and at a separation that allows you to stop if the person in front of you stops (even if it's for no apparent reason). That said, it's always "amusing" when people don't understand repeating lights and stop where they're not supposed to, and on a separate note, there are some locations where there is a box junction and a set of traffic lights where there's a stop line (and so you must stop at them) where it's virtually impossible to stop outside of the box for except for possibly the smallest of bikes (if even them)
In one case, there's even a level crossing which has a junction before it, and a box junction was added in retrospectively for the junction with very little space between the crossing stop line and the box junction, leaving enough space for a single car, guess lorries and buses don't matter much then hey
@@fetchstixRHD You're supposed to look more than 6 feet in front of your car when driving. Meaning you'd see there's not enough room and stop early.
Case in point. The mini driver is just as bad, they pull over on double yellows when they could have pulled into that petrol station about 100m up the road.
@@fetchstixRHD just to humour this scenario you would have to stop before the box then and at no point are you to stop in the box if you cannot clear it. It makes your example moot to explain the repeating light situation.
@2:56 #7 the mini had no reason to stop where it did. The red light was a repeater for the lights before the yellow box. With no light king to stop at. Bad driving by both. The cam car wasn’t expecting the mini to stop in the middle of the road for no reason
Yep. At 2:52 the Mini drove over the solid white line, (that cars must stay behind when the lights are red) before the lights were red.
@@CyborgGerbilThat was not a problem as there was no stop line at the lights the mini stopped at.
#7 looks like they've mistaken the repeater light. The clip starts part way through the junction so it's difficult to tell it's the repeater light but I can't see a solid white stop line in front of it which means that light doesn't apply to those vehicle now and they should've continued through. This is why the cammer wouldn't have easily anticipated the mini stopping because it wasn't supposed to.
In clip #7, I think the mini stopped suddenly as they were concerned the pedestrian on the left was going to step out.
A lot of people panic when the see the lights change. The reason we have 3 lights in a traffic sequence is to give us time to decide if we can stop safely or if it is too late to stop and it's safer to continue. If the pedestrian walks out when the crossing sign is still red then it's their own fault if they get hit.
@@scottleadbetter7167 it doesn't matter the driver was going too fast for the light to be on yellow as the mini was slowing down
@femmyfox9339 If the mini hadn't done an emergency stop as soon as the lights went amber they they would have passed through the amber light leaving room for the car behind to stop.
@@scottleadbetter7167 but any car is allowed to stop that's why you should leave enough room to slow down
@femmyfox9339 no, it's unsafe to stop suddenly at changing lights
A great compilation. This is why when I am in the UK, I take a bus, a train, a taxi, or I walk! And, I always look both ways.
I wouldn’t take a bus because you might get called a bus w*nker
You'll find the UK is safer than a lot of other countries. We have the safest roads in Europe, and probably some of the safest in the world.
@@DavidVanPatten358 Oh, I completely agree. It is just that your lanes and roads and carriageways require a high level of skill, which I do not possess. I do very much like the idea that learners´ vehicles are clearly marked, so as to give surrounding motorists an opportunity to give way when necessary to a new driver. 😀
@@DavidVanPatten358the safest is Norway. And even the “safest” road is still vastly more dangerous than walking or taking the train
@@DavidVanPatten358 I find that hard to agree with although I’ve only been on the road 1.5 years. It’s rolling dice every time you pull off the drive, for what is going to try and put a dent in your car.
22:56 Notice that the Range Rover has an illegal registration number. It should read KA51 MBB
No shit
28:35 that road by Aston / M6 is an absolute nightmare - a lot of drivers don’t know where they want to go and often times people stop
Re Tuffnels green lorry, wheels locked up before the brake lights came on so maybe a mechanical fault?
Number 6 : doesn`t matter which way you have to look, they literally drove straight into that peugeot
Yes, and if you're not used to the roads, then you should be stopping at junctions anyway
If your user name is anything to go by you know that's the Blue House roundabout on the Great North Road, and there's so many bumps happen there, not normally that bad, but it's not a great place for new drivers.
#9, I'm used to seeing drivers who have absolutely no idea how wide their cars are, but having one who does not know how long it is, is a little rarer. Most people who have little cars have them for a reason, other than economy, I live by that and I give them a wide berth and pass when whenever possible.
#8 3:49 for once Stobart not at fault as they were stationary during the impact, in the wise words of Ashley Neal 'You can't hit anything if you're stationary'
Yep
No. 7 entirely at fault. There were three clear issues: 1. driving too close to the Mini, 2. not approaching traffic lights in anticipation of having to stop and 3. completely ignoring the yellow box in case the lights went to amber (at which point one is supposed to stop providing it is safe to do so).
No.8, Stobart was entering and the other truck was already in the roundabout, only one at fault there and that’s the vehicle joining the roundabout.
No. 9, words fail me, that was sheer incompetence on every level.
No. 27, surely the blue BMW 2 Series was travelling the wrong way up a one way road?
2:45 where the mini stopped was not a traffic light for them, it was the second light at that junction, so it should not have stopped as there is no stop line, just the line at the end of the yellow box junction
its a pedestrian crossing, a pedestrian is waiting to use who is not looking to be young and spry, I would have stopped here without a doubt and I would have been breaking earlier as well to manage a potential risk, though another point to make the mini is not hammering on and the guy behind is really not paying enough attention.
@@sirbollocks609
You need to take another look, there is no pedestrian crossing, yes there is a drop kerb, a pedestrian refuge and a button to set the traffic lights for the pedestrian cycle, but the absence of zebra crossing type painted road surface markings simply indicates a safer place to cross not a proper crossing.
The mini driver was wrongly reacting to the downstream traffic light by mistake, and had already crossed the stop line before the amber light came on, (which can just be seen in front of the cammer right at the start of the clip and more clearly on the repeat @2:53) that mini should not be stopping inside the yellow box and therefore is totally at fault.
Nice user name though 😂😂
@@sirbollocks609 Know your highway code, has to be a solid white line with a red light to stop.
@@unclegreybeard3969 not my best English I admin, "its a pedestrian crossing" was meant to say that the reason for the breaking is the pedestrian crossing the road, lol
@@sirbollocks609 That wasn’t a red light for the Mini driver. To prove this, there isn’t a solid white line at those lights, in front of the Mini, like there are on the opposite side of the road just before the lights.
Those lights were not for cars that have already drove past the first set of lights 2:52, that would have a solid white line where you must stop behind at a red light.
The Mini shouldn’t have stopped as those traffic lights were not for him.
However, even though it was the Mini driver’s fault, the camera car was going too fast and wasn’t paying attention. But still the Mini driver’s fault.
When the pedestrian will be able to cross, every traffic light will be red, in all directions.
54:45 To be fair to the Police officers it's clear that despite the hundreds of thousands of Pounds we pay in VEL (Road Tax) the local Authority could not be bothered to repaint the worn out white markings
Poor road markings is a massive pet peeve, including places where there are no stop lines visible at all
#7, that red light doesn't pertain to that pelican crossing, there is no solid line there to stop at. The stopping point is before the yellow box junction, it's a big open controlled T junction. Mini shouldn't have stopped, cam car shouldn't have rear ended. I've had exactly that situation at exactly that light.
Yeh but the pedestrian looked like they were ready to step out into the road… the Mini was quite right to stop.. the driver behind was driving to fast and too close to take evasive action
Well done that lorry driver at 20:04. Funniest thing I have seen in ages.
Thanks to #3 for being a good biker, love it.
for the mini clip. thats not even his light. the stop line is further back.
Yep at 2:52 where the Mini drives over the solid white line before the light was red.
The 106.
That looks to be the classic "Someone stole my car and crashed" I hope the insurance sees this video.
The blue Mini driver (2:47) shouldn’t have stopped there. There is no solid white line at the lights.
Yep. At 2:52 the Mini drove over the solid white line, before the lights were red.
54:55 is that a “Toucan Crossing” where the cyclist in the hi-vis rides across? Many ASLs are not well maintained
In clip #7... Did no-one saying the Mini was at fault see the traffic lights? The Mini didn't "stop suddenly" ; it braked when instructed to do so by the lights.
1:44 - poor observation by the car pulling out of the side road, but the golf driver was driving far too fast for the conditions and the emerging vehicle wouldn't have been expecting him to be going at that speed or overtaking the cammer.
23:50 seriously. coming to a full stop on a motorway? was it that traumatic of an event that you're going risk killing multiple people over
In the fast lane too
@@hausmaster9801** in the overtaking lane.
@@MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy If you really want to get pedantic it would be numbered and not named. It’s common name across the UK is the “fast lane” the “overtaking lane” is an Americanism, one of many I refuse to accept or use
@@hausmaster9801 What evidence do you have for that? When I refer to the right-hand lane as the overtaking lane I'm referring to Roadcraft and the Highway Code. Regardless of your speed, you should be in the left-hand lane. You only move to the right lane(s) to overtake the vehicles.
@@MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy highways England the ones that maintain and operate the motorways and roadways as well as the public sectors such as police, paramedics, fire, traffic officers and recovery services (aka all the professionals that use the roadways) call the lanes by number, or near side or off side lanes on duel carriageways.
The nurse driver has a lot to answer for because that is an absolute disgrace 😤
It is a few years old that one, she was prosecuted and banned, never even had a licence
@@georgebarnes8163 not only that, no one seems to have pointed out she was over-taking on chevrons and then attempted in an oncoming right turn only lane before attempting again on chevrons, it's nice to see she received the long arm of the law wagging the finger in return
@@Keeldemlots of people have pointed that out every time it gets posted
@@georgebarnes8163 Says a lot for the NHS, what!?
what has it got to do with the NHS?@@2760ade
van at 01:08 can be reported for an offence. Rule 195 in the Highway Code states that: you MUST give way when a pedestrian has moved onto a crossing.
Incidents like #86 where the car pulls out in the cammer, shows that steering around someone is usually a lot safer than slamming on the brakes. Too many drivers simply slam on the brakes when a problem is unfolding often causing more collisions behind them.
One video I saw had a car crossing the hard shoulder after a crash. A driver confronted by the car spun his car round and gunned his engine. This brought him to a halt quicker than just using his brakes.
9:07 You can overtake on the left in slow moving queues of traffic. Is it me or does the queue on the left seem a bit short and moving quite fast?
The Mini @2.45 should not have stopped at all. That red light isnt for them. They passed the line where you would stop ages ago.
Although as they stop the light is red. If they had stopped and that light was amber then maybe. But that's deffo red.
@@nick_7869 Doesn't apply as this is a repeater light and there is no stop line.
@@nick_7869 That wasn’t a red light for the Mini driver. Those lights are for the cars that hadn’t crossed the solid white line, at the first set of traffic lights 2:52,a few car lengths behind the Mini.
Sometimes when you pull up to traffic lights, just behind the solid white line on the road, you can’t see the traffic lights. Because they are above you/above your wing mirrors. So you can’t see the colour change unless you lean forwards a lot and look up, or look out of the side window. Or if you’re driving a buss or lorry, you can’t always see the first set of lights at the solid white line. So they placed secondary/repeater lights a little bit in front, so you’ll be able to see the lights.
The Mini driver had past the first lights where you pull up to the white line on the road, meaning; you can’t go beyond it if the lights are red.
To prove this, there isn’t a solid white line at those lights, in front of the Mini (2:48), like there are on the opposite side of the road just before the lights.
Those lights were not for cars that have already drove past the first set of lights, that would have a solid white line where you must stop behind at a red light.
The Mini shouldn’t have stopped as those traffic lights were not for him.
However, even though it was the Mini driver’s fault, the camera car was going too fast and wasn’t paying attention. But still the Mini driver’s fault.
Your written explanation for the rear shunt on the mini is completely WRONG. The mini had no reason to stop as he did, the red light is for the junction he has already passed thro. Where he stopped there is no stop line, he was not required to stop. However the car rear ending him is at fault as far as Highway code and insurance decisions.
#13 is just based, he stops people from passing then rejoining 5 cars later. Just stay in line and wait, you have to rejoin with traffic anyways. It keeps the left lane free for emergency vehicles and buses. He literally just stops entitled drivers from skipping ahead.
No 102, by HMS Sultan. I spent much of my Naval Career there, and it can be a bit of a pain with people crossing for sure.
Note cammer's close pass on the cyclist at 46:25 on #94.
#13 “L-G-zero-8-zero-A-Y” hilarious
Why?
14:30 old man decides to block all traffic from getting around - What a nob.
2:46 .. the Mini stopped in the junction thinking the second set of lights (beyond the box junction markings) were a different lights when in fact they are connected to the ones they'd already gone though. I wish I had a quid for the number of times people do that on larger junctions.
Yep. At 2:52 the Mini drove over the solid white line when the lights were not red. There is no solid white line in front of the Mini when it stopped. So it shouldn’t have stopped there.
love how many of these are around birmingham . my comercial driving turf🤔
#7 How many times do you see this? The driver enters the junction on a changing light at amber, then on the other side of the junction stops when the light goes to red: IT'S STILL THE SAME SET OF LIGHTS!! The Mini should not have stopped: they've crossed the stop line so they need to complete their transition through the junction. It's not even as if it was a big junction
This! Yet so many people (certainly from these comments) cannot comprehend that! However, this doesnt excuse the poor reaction times of the cammer.
@@BlackCelica the camper shouldn’t have entered the junction. And he drove like a spacker
@@MiningForPies Where did I dispute that? We are talking about the mini stopping when they shouldn't have. The only comment I made that was integral to the accident was the cammer having poor reaction times.
bullshit those lights were red when the mini was crossing the hatched area the cammera car was driving too fast and should have anticipated the lights
@@MrDBSV8 those are the traffic light at the rear of the junction you don't stop for them. The same lights were be at the begging of the junction and both cars went through the first lights in time. The problem the mini got confused and thought he had to stop at second lights and the driver behind was not paying attention. Rear driver still at fault.
16:09 if you zoom in closely you will notice, that the driver of a blue BMW was actually Wong.
Nice One Piotr H - I lived in China for 6 years and never drove - They are terrible drivers!
50:44 #105 I live there in Ashby-de-la-zouch and that roundabout is renown for having car crashes! Pretty much always in that exact spot too believe it or not
Once used the truck I was driving to block this flyover as my forward observation showed that Fire Brigade needed both ways closed to deal with an accident and could be easily bypassed by the roundabout below.
Local Plod was kind enough to ask if my truck arrived at the road block position by skidding when he arrived (despite no tyre marks).and came to the wise decision to replace me
Having been trained by Met traffic cops, I was able to relieve him of his stupidity and teach him to do better in future.
If you don't understand the difference between overtake and undertake in GB (we drive on the left) best keep your mouth shut.
#4 I disagree. The Golf overtook by going on hashing and was a distance away from the junction when the car arrived. The driver probably made the right decision for a car travelling at the speed limit. The only problem was he was slow to pull away and the golf was speeding. Both at fault, but it dies matter how fast the Golf was travelling.
But the Golf was doing well above the speed limit, if a driver has no ability to judge the speed of approaching traffic they shouldn't be driving (neither should the Golf driver tbf).
@@ferrumignisIMO, the emerging driver has judged (and rightly so) that he has right of way based on the amount of clear road he can see on his right. He then has to look left before he can start the manoeuvre. He doesn't have to judge the Golf's speed, but possibly he has assessed the speed of the camcar and not seen the Golf ( it wasn't in the correct road position) and anyway speeding doesn't give you right of way!
Assuming the cam car was close to the speed limit, you can see his right turn was safe based on how close the cam car was to the incident. I believe the Golf is doing 20mph over the camcar so that is 50 in a 30. Way too fast!
The Golf has also overtaken in the short distance between two bollards that is hashed. The authorities really don't want people to overtake there! So it's not just speeding, it's excessive speeding and reckless driving.
Finally the emerging driver has seen the Golf and stopped, so he made the continuous observation.
I do apportion some blame to the emerging driver, but that portion of the blame depends on how much faster than the speed limit the Golf was doing, which I can't honestly judge.
I'm just glad the moderator isn't a traffic court judge. So many ridiculous claims being made about who is at fault.
#73 I wouldn't have done that, but i would have been sorely tempted!
4:42 ehh, summer tyres. Who bothers to use the winter tyres during the winter. Probably only me.
2:45 Mini should not have stopped because there was no solid white line, meaning that the red light does not apply to them! However, the cammer is still at fault because it is a rear-end collision and they did not leave adequate braking room and were not paying enough attention. I think on reviewing the footage most insurance companies would choose to settle as joint-fault due to Mini's dangerous driving.
1:18 Dill Hall Lane in Accy near the M65 J7. Bellends everywhere.
I'm amazed at the amount of people who pull over after being hit. What you want to do is stay exactly where you are and take photos of how and where the impact happened in relation to the road. The amount of people who can lose because the third party offers an alternative truth and without concrede photographs, easily get away with it.
#80 it is for that reason that you should use the Dutch Reach technique for opening a car door so you can check the blind spot
The clip at 2:45 - Mini stopped for no reason, probably confused that the lights went red, and was wrong to do so, however the cammer had plenty of time to react.
Yep. Mini was a muppet, but the crash was the cammer's fault.
@@chrisfifield-smith Indeed, cammer had plenty of time to react but chose not to, would be curious to know who the insurance companies are blaming and at what split, if any.
Mini stopped exactly how it should. It was yellow when entered hashed area and mini did not crossed on RED. The camer should have stopped before hashed area. Camer's fault.
@@batvetone LOL, what? The mini was in the junction and should have cleared it. The red light it stopped at was for cars not yet in the junction. There is no stop line where the mini stopped.
@@batvetone As much as I agree majority blame, if not all, is with the cammer, you are wrong on how the mini handled it. They were in a junction and should have cleared it, its a double set of lights that signal the cars before the box, not in the box..... Really the faults here are the mini driver getting confused by the lights and stopping when they shouldn't have (otherwise are you telling me they should stop in a box junction?) and the cammer for gunning through an amber and having the reactions of a sloth.
30:57 Nice little cricket ground there, wonder where that is?
2:45 The Mini was already in the Junction. Those light did not have a stop line and the mini was clearly at fault for stopping when they should not have. Thoses are far lights and not stop lights.
Driving down an empty lane past a queue of more than 6 vehicles, it's evens that one of them will pull out.
14:40 - Kinda think that one of the cars ahead had cut up the tow car when moving out of lane 2 and the tow car (which was probably speeding anyway) braked and put itself out of control.
Oh my god! I go down that same route at 1:14 every day for work.
Tell who ever it is that Olly wants to buy him a drink.
1.38 you are now allowed to serve inbetween crossings and speed in 30mph built up areas now because it's the car that's pulling outs fault.
119 had a clear view of the traffic coming up the ramp and had all the room in the world to move over a lane to allow easy merging.
18:00 actually, you nearly hit him. Ridiculous place for him to overtake but as an officer I can tell you, the rules state you must look both ways and giveway to traffic already on the road you are joining.
the 105. What an optimistic person, no? She clearly think it's ok to cross 3 lanes and everyone else that it's not you must give you the right of pass!?
I find the incidents in those narrow, winding English town streets most entertaining.
The 80. Not just that! He parked at 1 inch distance inside the road even knowing how small the streets are!
@52:48 i see people are still speeding round in brixton south london lmao
first clip..... curious as to why you are in the outside lane, as all three lanes appear equal.
The Tuffnels driver was obviously distracted with his lane wandering, and then he pulled the hanbrake instead of the gear lever.
totally disagree with the comments about the mini, the light was amber as it went over the road marking so they were correct to stop regardless of how hard they were braking
#122 59:39 Good driving from the cammer. He saw the situation and kept out of it - unlike many who assume they won't become involved and carry on regardless.
#62 White van driver is not at fault and it infuriates me that they expect him to take time out of his day to stop and deal with their dangerous driving. Cammer is not leaving a safe gap. Obviously neither is the person who rear ended them. It's 2 seconds in dry conditions for a REASON. If the car you're following is obscuring your view you are also not leaving a big enough gap. You should be able to see the car IN FRONT of the car you're following. We have no idea why the van driver breaks harshly here, but if the cammer was driving safely this wouldn't be an issue.
There really ARE a massive amount of bad drivers out there , dash cam highlights them . But some with dash cams play devils advocate , by making something out of nothing . Shame the police don't get to deal with the worst footage . I constantly ask myself , why do other drivers when in a queue , park SO CLOSE to the car in front , if that car rolled back or stalled , they would rear end it . I leave a car length , incase I need to pull round to pass , or I , get rear ended by a bad driver .
The mini stopped late but fairly, as the light was on red before it got to the junction. It could equally have braked for someone stumbling into the road or a child chasing a lost ball. The driver behind was 100% not in adequate control of their vehicle.
The 44.. WTF man!! You can NOT stop in the middle of the highway unless the car it's trashed and you can NOT move it. Someone scratched your car and you are just about to get yourself and someone else kill stopping in the middle!! Common sense...
ALL drivers in the UK need to learn about Destination Zero - that's 0 accidents being the aim for 2041 on London's Roads! this means Safer Streets, Safer Speeds, Safer Vehicles and Safer Behaviours on the roads. This means that the driving standards to pass a test from NOW on will be much harder! People will soon no longer be able to move to the UK from other countries and just 'exchange their licence' for a British Licence (they will have to pass a driving test first). We have become sloppy in our self discipline in the UK with regard to driving... and it's time to change that! In every situation the human element can fail - the Road system should not!
#104, how can anyone undertake traffic on their left?
@47:00 'Excellent commentary!'
30.10 When you see a guy with his elbow hanging out the window you just know he is thinking more about himself than anyone else.
Probably the best motor he,s ever driven and feeling good about it. Most likely the bosses motor too.
18:52 That "Range Rover" isn't a Range Rover, It's a Land Rover Freelander, Great compilation though! 😁
4:49 Jim Bowen had a phrase on Bullseye; stay in the black keep out of the red there's nothing in this game for two in a bed. I think the black and white areas here are a simile.
That's my street!
experience taught me as a passenger, if the driver overcorrects into a tankslapper, shout " let Go" the castor effect will straighten the wheels then you can pull it straight, only had it happen once but it deffo worked
From what I’ve seen from these videos and over 5 years of driving so far, the cars that are being driven by bad drivers are (but not limited too)
Any BMW, Mercedes or Audi
Peugeots (specifically 2000’s Peugeots)
Taxis
And Van Drivers
#77 Your car would have been clearly visible in his passenger side door mirror, had he been bothered to look.
can we all please just appreciate the background music to this 2:17 hahaha
If you look at dashcam recordings, you can see that there are bad, selfish, stupid drivers all over the world. But it shows everywhere, the people who sit in an SUV are the worst, they are the psychopaths among the drivers. The scene at minute 15:44 is a good example of this.
3.49..Pair of green light greyhounds. Trap door up, GO!!!!! They deserve all the paperwork they give each other.
#101 & #119 is a classic ' I will not let anyone in'...Cammer's driving and Audi's ???
45:53 Silver Range Rover might be doing a second lap of roundabout. It seems there is a road closure and lots of yellow signs. Cammer does not factor in the possibility that Range Rover might not exit but continue round. Vehicles travelling this slow circulating roundabouts need special caution from other drivers even where no temporary signs are shown. Cammer works herself up unnecessarily over this.
So glad #70 told us they were off to play a bit of tennis
Puts it into context
You rear end somebody....your to blame. If they stop for no reason its irrelevant, you should leave enough space to able to stop.
Nope.
What is the music called in number 94