Simon Jordan Claims Sir Jim Ratcliffe's Multi-Club Ownership Of Man United & Nice Is A BAD Thing ๐ฑ
์์ค ์ฝ๋
- ๊ฒ์์ผ 2024. 03. 25.
- TalkSPORT's Simon Jordan explains why multi-club ownerships such as Sir Jim Ratcliffe's ownership of Manchester United and Nice is a bad thing.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this KRplus video? ๐
๐ฅ๏ธ talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
๐ฒ talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
๐ท talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
๐ค talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
๐ฑ talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
๐ด Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
๐ Want to see if you feature on our KRplus channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: โข The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talkSPORT
#premierleague
#simonjordan
#manchesterunited - ์คํฌ์ธ
![2์ธ ๊ณํ [์๊ทผ์ปคํ S.K.Couple]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JheKjUzVja8/mqdefault.jpg)
![[๋จน๋ฐฉ ๋ธ์ด๋ก๊ทธ#93] ์ธ์ ์ฒซ ํ์ด๋๋ผ์ค๋ฅผ ๊ฐ๋ค(with๋ฏธ์)๐ฅ ๊ทผ๋ฐ ์ด๋ ๊ฒ ๋จน๋ ๊ฑฐ ๋ง์..?๐ฆ ๋์ฐ ๋ก์ ๋ถ๋ญ์ฐ๋ญ,์ฝ์ฝ๋ก์นด๋ผ ํธ๋ฉ,๋ ๋์ฝค๋ณด+ํฌ๋ฆผํ์คํ,ํฌ์ธ ๋ฒ ๋ฆฌ์์ด์ค๋ฐ์ค](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TGHvxa0ZYwA/mqdefault.jpg)
![[EN/JP] ํ๊ฒ์ด impossible ์์ฑ์ํจ ๐๋ผ์ด์ฆโ ๐ l ํ์์ฒ์ ๋ณด์ํจ ์์ฆ2 EP.09](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ydRNw-e9C3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Meanwhile Manchester City's parent company City Football Group is the biggest single owner of Girona FC and has been since 2017.
Not to mention Red Bull own a few clubs as well.
Hated, adored, never ignored.
โ@@kadarabdullahiMan U, Chelsea and liverpool fans say the same thing.....๐
โ@kadarabdullahi I hope you're not referring to City when you make that statement ๐
CFG have 13 !! ๐ come on citeh !!
It's fine for The City Group and all the clubs Red Bull own but now it's a problem. For a guy moaning about the media always talking about United, he certainly likes to talk about United ๐คฃ
He didn't say it's fine. He acknowledged this already exists. I don't disagree with a single thing that Simon said.
Simon is an expert in everything apart from running Crystal Palace.
For real๐
I wish more people would pull him up on when he held a Press Conference and claimed he'd bought Selhurst Park for the good of the club when, in fact, he'd got one of his richer mates to buy it so they could blackmail the next owner into buying it at an inflated price once Jordan was done with the club
oh give it a rest, its been bloody years since Simon owned Palace. Old News and a pathetic out of date joke.
โ@@kernowchrisWhere's the joke ?
Heโs the president of the lord Simon Jordan fan club ๐
City group and red bull own multiple clubs but as soon as its man utd its a problem
The city group will most likely have Girona and Man City in the champions league this year, but when it involves United, the sky is falling.
1:06 advert marquees are matching perfectly. Been waiting for that for years
Not one to stick up for United, but doesn't Mr. Boehly's group also own Strasbourg and others? And Mr. Edwards explicitly stated that FSG plan to acquire another club. I wonder if that's a problem for Mr. Jordan, too?
These same people are the one's in favour of him to own United instead of sheikh jassim
Jassim was a scammer.
@@harrydestaffano565Proof of that claim?
@@calvinhicks1992 Are you serious? The Qatari bid fronted by Jasim failed to provide proof of funds throughout the drawn-out sales process. They bid but never had a bid that was above $5bn despite claiming they bid 6 million pounds plus a million to remove debt. Without proof of funds their bid was not real, worthless. They also ignored requests to value A and B Class shares equally so even if they provided a legitimate bid with proof of funds it could never have been presented to the United board.
The facts relating tom the Qatari interest in United were laid out in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filing released on 17th January.
Although the Qatari response to the raise Securities and Exchange Commission filing was to claim what was written was not true and to threaten to sue they never sued Questions about the nature of the Qatari interest and the lies they told in their public relations have been asked.
It seems the Qatari interest in United was purely about gaining credibility.
Fortunately, unlike back in 1989, when businessman Michael Knighton agreed a deal to buy United that fell apart United avoided embarrassment from the Qatari scam.
โ@@calvinhicks1992maybe not a scammer but just look at his overall wealth, and not his family wealth (his wealth) hes got less money than mike Ashley. I'm guessing he was borrowing money left, right, and centre to put a bid in for Manchester United.
Well obviously sheikh jassim is royal family of Qatar obviously he is gonna borrow money from his royal family
Whilst I appreciate Simon's views as a former owner, his opinions all seem so tainted by that experience to the point he thinks everyone in the game (agents, players, managers, governing bodies etc) are all dark forces working against the saints that are the club owners who are always the misunderstood victim of their actions. He's the proverbial jilted fiancรฉ at the alter
He 's also a wannabe who I believe was released by Chelsea's academy. This might explain his contempt for professional footballers earning fortunes despite going all gooey when talking to highly-paid boxers such as Frochy (retired) which he uses in reference to his mate Carl Froch.
Funny that ๐
I am curious why Simon hates Steve Parish so much? I wonder if it's because Steve proved he can run Crystal Palace, stay in the PL and not go bankrupt.
Yep itโs one of the few areas SJ lets himself down when he attacks Parish. Simply because Simon has control of the airwaves and Parish had no recourse to respond to all the slights & digs that Simon gives him.
Enron never was "an accountancy firm" .. Simon Jordon just says any old nonsense that comes into his head and it sounds feasible.
Oh no! MUFC & OGC Nice....and......
City & Girona
Villa & Vitoria de Guimaraes
Brighton & Union Saint-Gilloise
I agree it shouldn't be allowed though.
Red Bull and Red Bull
Villa or should I say V sports do not have a controlling share just 17% from what I gather. It was 29% but to avoid this the shares were passed back to the club.
Chelsea strasbourg. Watford udinese. Leeds owner also owns sampdoria
Man City and Liverpool are multi owners and its okay yeah???? Typical TALK SPORT
Liverpool doesn't own another football club....lol FSG owns a hockey and baseball team...
@@elijahtchilembe-mpovie2715 Heโs probably utd and letโs be honest most of them arenโt the sharpest tool in the shed.
we're not talking dollars for donuts here. he just needs to back the courage of his convictions.
It's always the same With the Man Utd Haters. Your Hate Only Makes Us Stronger ๐๐
Surprise surprise Jim white talking about Man utd again he's a Man utd propaganda mouthpiece
Watford owns udinese, city owns girona, chelsea owns strasbourg and have under the table partnership with reading, and official partnership with vitesse. But itโs united that this clown with toupee draws the line ๐๐
Was never an issue for Simon. You donโt get into Europe for being relegated and then going into administration.
Why are we only talking about this now? City have done this fir years including "loaning" players between clubs.
Peps brother is literally in charge at Girona
Because uefa upheld the rules. It looked likethey were going to get rid of them but they decided the other day not to. The guardian then did an article talking about how utd and nice could be in the europa league next season but utd would be kicked outas they are lower in the league than nice.
0:33 "Owners should be able to get around the rules with loop holes and I'll defend their right to do it"
0:48 "Oh that isn't true? Well in that case I've never liked it and never supported it"
How on earth, Al, do you come to that conclusion? He says nothing remotely like you say he has said.
Why don't they talk about any other multi-club ownership models? This isn't a new thing
Multi club ownership is a way of beating FFFP rules, as simple as that and why Man City are City Football Group. Red Bull and now Chelsea with Strasbourg and plenty more clubs. All about spreading spens and buying players that can be loaned to your own clubsโฆ.. watch Liverpool with FSG start buying clubsโฆ.
There should be a cap off 50 million for transfers and wages 100 thousand a week more than enough for anyone
No there shouldnโt, thatโs stupid
@@danielberry4765 how ???
3:20 one of many tuesday squeaky chair moments again
Shouldnโt they just say that a multi-club ownership model can only be allowed if thereโs only one club per continent owned. At least then thereโs no issues with the continent competitions.
I see theyโre still chatting about Utd.
Only a few weeks ago, Utd get to much attention.
I love Jim and Simons dynamic with each other
Its not a issue for United. Glazers majority owners
I agree with Simon on this. And not just for United. No one should own 2 clubs who ever could play each other, short of a friendly. Itโs asking for match fixing to happen in the future and that is how a sport dies
Simon but this is simple, just a rule - if there are significant owners (let's say over 5% or 10% shareholdings) clubs can not sell players to each other / loan them. this would cut any murky transactions. maybe not any as they would find a way but there is easy fix and clever solution for it.
To me, it is more that Man Utd can buy players at cut price or inflated prices to help one or the other financially.
Yeah agreed.....rather than just inflated prices ๐ ๐ ๐
Jordan is an envious so and so, he wasnโt saying whilst other clubs have been doing it in Europe.
This kind of people is the reason the world is hard to leave today. The truth does not matter to them when it comes to Man United.
Multi club ownership is the biggest threat to the integrity of football, the small clubs end up become farm systems for the bigger clubs
Let's have clear rules in place. However, poor governance will lead to problems and unfairness. It's seems to me the winners take all.
Wasnt Simon cheerleading Sir Jim over Jassim and now he comes out with this?
Hypocrisy is the biggest virtue of any english soul. As Mou once say it..Respect! Respect!
Simon ..Enron never was an accountancy firm. They were an energy company ๐ข
Totally agree, one club only.
Simon Jordan defending owners, hating on agents, hating on regulations that impact his owners, hating on deregulating agents and taking pot shots at Steve Parrish. This clip was a full bingo card
Red Bull were able to get round the ruling due to the 50+1 rule in Germany, by that ruling the fans own majority of Leipzig.
Members. They put the cost of membership up sky high. Then their employees became the only members and had the controlling vote.
Red bull are fully in control of both teams.
Simon is wrong what about the city group of clubs?
Isn't it marvellous City have been doing exactly the same for many years. Yet as soon as United opt to do. the same, you throw your toys out of the pram.
Once anything involves Manchester United, talksport ๐ก๐ก๐ก โฆ but some clubs have done this for more than 10 years
Simon :"it shouldn't be allowed" all because someone other than him can run two clubs at once & when Simon was at palace he couldn't run a bath
Funny this was not a talking point under City and Newcastle. Now Utd are involved it needs to be stopped
Surprise surprise Simonโs agenda against united continues ๐
Simon has become very bitter recently. Why is he on the radio if he think so little of the likes of Neville, Borson and others with a valid opinion/knowledge. He turns his nose up at the fact he is now a journalist and doesnโt have the money he once had. Suck it up mate.
Ok for other owners to do it, just not United's, gotcha Simon ๐
I donโt agree with multi-club ownership.
Is Simon ever happy ?
What about the City group?
What about them you tell me
@@user-pf2rx3mj4e well itโs a similar thing isnโt it. City group are Cityโs parent company and also own Girona who will be in the UCL no doubt next year.
CFG my own the to but they don't have a say int day to day running of the clubs under their ownership that'ts the difference as per Red Bull@@craigglassford2384
how can something so NICE be so BAD?
Postman pat has never mentioned city and girona tho?
Agreed one club only
Jordan "i am a capitalist" and "lets get rid off agents and wage cap footballers".
Jordan really has lost the plot.. the City Group own about 12 clubs world-wide.. Ratcliffe owns two, but he's the problem ๐
Simon talking up his backside as always, Man City own multiple clubs across the world and Liverpool are going that route also
Umm Enron wasn't an accounting firm
Goalkeepers on loan can face their club in European competitions
Sir Jordanite = Top LAD Proper Clobber ๐ฏ Facts
Its fine for City and Red Bull but not United eh?
Multi-Club ownership greed corporate business model. Football not only business. FIFA must implement new rule.๐
It wont be a thing anyway because utd will be in the champions league and nice will be in the europa league. I dont think it matters anyway red bull have had 2 teams in the champions league for last 3 or 4 years and they werent stopped. This is just another way to bring man utd into a conversation to get clicks ๐ they are still pissed off we beat liverpool so they cant slag us off for on the pitch stuff so now we get the other nonsense like this, southgate, etc....
Have these guys heard of the City Group and Red Bull?
They mention red bull in the video, muppet
@@danielberry4765 Start with those
How is City getting away w/ it??
Lmfao why have they not had this conversation about City or Red Bull??? Hmmmm the United agenda continues
I wonder how many of these manchester united fans crying in the comments section have actually been to Manchester before
You don't need to go to Hollywood in order to have an opinion of movies... ๐
Glazers are in at man utd you don't own man utd that a fact
Man u had a monopoly on the league for years
Iโll drink some Red Bull to that!๐๐คก
I think you must drink something much "stronger" to feel better, when this Expert number 1 talks๐ค. Regards from Norway ๐ธ๐ฏ
Been going on for years with multiple teams doing it but now Talksport suddenly care now itโs Man United
Jim doesn't own united. The glazers still do
Haha. City does the same thing and Simon calls it business. What a hypocrite
So, if other clubs have the same owners then we don't talk about it. United have a large shareholder who also is involved with the ownership of another club, then we have to constantly talk and throw even more mud at Old Trafford, because you know, ratings. Pfft. Unsubscribed, all the best talkshit.
city dos has well
As usual something that has been happening for years on end becomes a problem when itโs united doing it ๐๐๐๐
Always using United to get clicks! Only time some โprofessionalsโ are relevant when talking about United. If you felt this strongly you would have spoke about other sporting groups years ago City, Red Bull do I go on?
After this year the champion league is done
Simon is a loud mouth! NEVER says anything good about Manchester United. It will be nice if he can go back to Crystal Palace to redeem his image. "Mr. Know All".๐๐คจ
City group ? Red bull group ?
simon gets prompted from producers what they want said for clicks. he doesny have the balls to speak what HE actually feels ans thinks
Preferencthhhh
Iโve got millions
Enron never did accounts
Not properly anyway.
old timer Jordan, abeg leave us alonne
Whatโs great about top 6 their all losers I donโt get it they won nothing
เฆธเฆฌเฆเฆพเฆจเงเฆคเฆพ เฆเฆพเฆฎเฆเฆพเฆเฆฏเฆผเฆพเฆฒเฆพ
City football group ๐
Stop now
Any chance to have pop at parish lol
It shouldn't be allowed full stop.
Sir jim i feel will mainly supply money for man utd and should be forced to sell nice
Soon as it is United its a massive issue you cant make this up.
Fooooooooooooooooooootball!!
oh shut up Jim dont act like you dont see the issue here and why two teams playing against each other with the same ownership isnt problematic. you could easily have a situation where a team isnt going to get it to europe next year by league postion but there best chance is winning in europe the current year to be in it next year. then the two teams meet and you could have a situation where it is the interest of the owner to basically throw the game away for one of his teams to give another a better chance of going through next year. then you also have the issue of player trades between the two clubs. easy to just set your own transfer fee up for a player when they are just moving between your own two clubs.
Should be talkmanutd ๐
But city have well over 10 clubs plus Liverpool potential. Not to mention Redbull amongst others. But when it comes on to my club we cant have it.
When Man City do it no one cares...but Man United do it and now UEFA jump
UEFA havenโt jumped
2 ๐๏ธ ends