Why Gravity is NOT a Force

@Veritasium "In curved space time you have to accelerate just to remain stationary"
Seems more like physicists have become so enthralled by these mathematical equations they are willing to throw out observable reality for them. I have two options, I can either call a lack of motion "acceleration" (which contradicts the clear definition of the term) or question the math / model I'm using to describe the physical world.

First 😀

@@sarthakgandhi324 not first

@@destroya3303 throwing out the way things appear to be is core to physics. Aristotle said an object's natural state is to come to rest. Newton figured out it was friction making everything come to rest and without that force everything would keep moving in a straight line with constant velocity. You are being Aristotle in this situation.

@@destroya3303 You do understand that motion itself is relative? When you don't accelerate, you don't feel any force, and so far the falling object doesn't feel it (well it does feel air but it's a friction and it's a force), while you stationary - do. And you move up relative to falling object, it's just that you climb curved spacetime same amount that it curves

Poor apple was just trying go on a straight line in spacetime, minding its own buisiness.

*@Colton Smith* Lmao you made me laugh🤣

Hahahahahaha

+Cotton Smith While wearing a bucket on his head.

This is the kind of comment I live for 🤣

I simply became a temporary inertial observer.

simple explanation

lol

"I was following my true path... through spacetime."

@@Lime-rr6zf no.. you didn't.. cuz you didn't actually fall DOWN from a height.. you just fell down ..

He will be remembered 😢😢😢

The true mvp is the Cameraman 😔

@@fridolfgranq fax

Also copped a boot to the face in that weightless simulation plane.

Could you help me with a simple question?
What makes engineering different from physics?

​@@mmoonchild276application

Hey if you don’t mind me asking, which uni/college did you go to for physical engineering, that is a major I’m interested in and from my research, very few colleges have that as an option and I will be applying to colleges next year so it would be great iylmk

@@niy._. well mine was in Portugal in the faculty of Science in Porto University

@@mmoonchild276weed out classes and corporate politics

😂

and the apple flies through spacetime

@WolframaticAlpha ?

@WolframaticAlpha xbox fanboy smh

No man, Einstein falls towards apple but I like Samsung

'theyre rubbing it in your face'

Gotta love that predictive programming

Also flat earthers: chek maite, won uf yoer gais sed gravitee is faek

But gravity is a lie rock climbers die annually from not being attracted to the cliff face.

@@sebastianstewart6894 rock climbers are attracted to the earth more than they are too the rock they are climbing. ofc they'll fall towards the ground

Apart his genius, I like to remember to people that THINGS do not evolve like in movies, we are the same intelligent humans since 10k years, the only things changing are the tools we have at our disposal, 4k yo Einstein is a real thing 😂

I watch this video again and again every couple months to understand it more. Also on my 4th watch, I think I just accepted how to the falling man, everyone else is accelerating up

​@@fabriziogiordano2405actually wrong, contrary to popular belief, thanks to the mass utilization of ethyl as gas fuel sometime ago, our generation and at least 3 generations before are dumber than our ancestors.

liked your comment so you could watch it again, imma watch it for my 2nd time soon

That’s maybe why if your really clever they call you Einstein, he was really clever, your mind was boggled because you obviously didn’t realise he was really clever, and technology would not have helped him as it was mostly theoretical.

I love your Videos too Especially The Speed of Light

I like black fire experiment

Love you videos also agreed

Ok

I love your Videos too

Geodesic of a drunk is called collapsoida.

@@efimkrivov jailoida

NICE ONE! XD

Except that all geodesics are straight lines

The cop kills you right then and there for being a smartass

Another way to think about it is if you have two masses, one that is 1kg, and another that is 10kg. Gravity will pull with 10x more force on the larger object , because it has 10x more mass, but because it has 10x the mass it has 10x the inertia, so requires 10x more force to get going. The additional force and additional inertia cancel out, so all you are left with is the same acceleration for both.

Heres something cool. Its not just gravity. If you look at the equations for the Coriolis "force" or centrifugal "force" they too have a factor of m you can cancel. These "forces" are all 'ficticious forces' meaning they arise from choosing a non inertial frame of reference

Don't sweat it. Gravity is just space accelerating downwards into earth. Earth itself is not accelerating, but objects inside the spacetime around it collapse at the same rate (cause space is collapsing acceleratingly).

In fact you ought to be able to use any information that you can validate scientifically, but perhaps the primary school educational system is not very scientific. ;-)
Maybe you ought to try (but don't cause TOO MUCH trouble) challenging your teachers on why these factors can be canceled. It's very clear that Newtonian physics can't quite explain it.
hopefully their viewpoint is not completely immutable, i.e.stubbornly resistant to new information, in which case you might end up teaching them something. If not, well, you tried.
Whatever you do, don't stop thinking for yourself, because some of the biggest problems in life come from letting others think for you, from letting others tell you what to think. Independent and verifiable thinking and experimentation is how science got where it is.

Show this video to your teachers.. why let them remain in the dark? It's your obligation to enlighten them if they're going to be teaching invalid information. If I were a teacher I would appreciate a student showing me new information.. it's always fun learning something new. If they're good teachers, they'll feel the same.

slightly cursed comment

@@sohamacharya171 that’s the point

just who tf ruined the 69?

@Jay Pace Send pics.

thats cursed

No, Spacetime willed the collison. The word of Spacetime is truth itself.

So.... Newton's head fell onto the apple

exactly

Newton's head was in the straight line path that the apple was taking, but Newton's head wasn't itself taking a straight line path.

I thought he was just calling in geodeSick to skip work.

That's not how it works. There is still an EARTH that you cannot ignore and go off floating.

Reminds me of a joke in one of the ASDF Movie.
A guy says: Screw Gravity.
Then simply floats away.
... it's much better seen than written in text, the asdf jokes are mostly visual.

Hahahaha ✌🏻

Lmao

Sorry to nitpick but he didn't say "Gravity is an illusion", he said "Is gravity an illusion?" It's a question.

First one to reply...✌
I like your videos 🤗

You could totally make a video on that I think it would be cool.

Quoting the wise Sheev Palpatine - DO IT!

Quoting the wise Shia LaBeouf - JUST DO IT!

Love to see youtubers support one another. It’s amazing!! Love your videos destin!!

I had to watch this twice to get it and use my prior knowledge from physics class but it's quite interesting. Still a lot of questions unanswered though.

But the video makes at least two mistakes.
1. that you "don't feel" acceleration if you are falling through space and bending towards a planet is not an argument against gravity as a force. Gravity as a force pulls at each of your particles in the same way, i.e. same direction and same magnitude, which is why you cannot feel it. But if you stand on the ground, then you do feel the counterforce of the ground on your feet because that force acts on your feet and not on every particle of your body.
2. while general relativity may answer the question why inertial mass = gravitational mass, it does not explain why inertial mass determines the bending of spacetime. So it just shifts the question rather than answering it.
In the end, general relativity is just a mathematical description that happens to have excellent predictive power in most situations, but that does not actually explain anything. Einstein gave no explanation as to HOW mass would bend spacetime.

@@ronald3836 I disagree. When traveling along a geodesic and not feeling a force, that is the definition of an inertial observer. You feel gravity on earth not just on your feet, but everywhere. The earth is blocking your geodesic path through space.
General relativity may not yet provide a clear answer to exactly why space curves to your satisfaction but it does explain with remarkable precision what is going on. That in itself is a pretty good answer.

@@hhjones9393 I guess we agree that, in rest (not in free fall), we feel gravity through the earth pushing us back. If you stand, the earth presses on your feet, and the atoms in your feet press on the atoms on top of them, etc. You feel this, and over the course of a day your spine compresses a bit. At night, people typically lie flat and the pressure they experience is less.
In free fall (ignoring air friction), we "don't feel" gravity independently of whether you view gravity as a force (e.g. Newton) or as a bending of spacetime (Einstein). It seems to me that Derek is trying to argue that "you don't feel acceleration in a free fall" means that you do not accelerate, i.e. that it shows that Newton was wrong and the Einstein is right. But this argument is just wrong. Even Newton will agree that you won't feel acceleration in a free fall (in vaccum), until you land on earth.
Derek is not very explicit in stating that this argument is "proof", so maybe I am being unfair, but even after watching the video several times it is still what I perceive to be the intended message.
I certainly agree that GR is a very valuable theory because of its predictive power. (And I'd like to understand whether the GR equations mandate the "bending of space-time" interpretation or whether it still allows for a "gravity is an attractive force" interpretation.)

That's what we internet should have been for

I'm high schooler from india preparing for JEE and understood everything in this video!

I don’t think people without years of education will understand this video too, but okay

I still dont get it..... And you dont get it too.....

@@okktok no I'm 14 and I understood everything I just needed to commit and re watch it 5-6 times to get every single term and to kinda start viewing things differently

Rather like the relativistic principle itself.

Just checked the date of the video, just to be certain

@Dancing Swords Because it contradicts observable things, like things falling towards the ground, by giving new definitions to words like force, gravity, acceleration. Even if all is true you can't steal words you must invent new words to describe them.

@Dancing Swords Einstein always said atomic bombs are not possible.

@Dancing Swords So why do the army use parachutes?
You better explain them: "There is no gravity, look at me jump without parachute."
Link here how you explain and jump. Thanks.

Very edgy boi

Underrated comment

The dedication of this man.

Explain your comment I didn't get it

@@xexstartheyoutuber2424 Derek says in the video that falling off a roof is one way you could feel weightless. Derek also assumes that if you're watching this video right now, then you probably don't feel weightless because you're probably sitting down on a couch or bed or whatever. So the guy who made the comment implied that he was, in fact, falling off a roof while watching the video, making him feel weightless.
God, dissecting jokes really isn't fun

Gravity doesn't exist as was shown by the hammer and feather drop tests. Both here and on the moon. How can your physics be valid if it's based on something that doesn't exist? A force so weak it can't be detected and yet it holds galaxies together? Don't piss on me and tell me it's raining.
What is the Higgs Boson? An electrical charge? There's your 'gravity'. It's why grains of dust coalesced in space.
When you worship at the alter of relativity, you become blind to reality. You see things backwards. How is it that relativitists believe that mass increases with acceleration and yet hot water as less mass than cold? How is it that relativitists believe time slows down with acceleration in space when objects accelerated in space are actually losing mass? And how is it that relativitists believe that Newton's apple falling from the tree is the result of gravity? But rather it's impact with the ground is because of 'gravity'. You will never find the gravition because gravity doesn't exist. Which means your theories based on gravity are baseless. But you have to keep the house of cards from falling down so let's start warping the cards.
How much more proof do you need to at least acknowledge that the earth isn't 'flat'.

Great comment!
As far as I understand, general relativity is really just a mathematical description (with excellent predictive power) which does not attempt to explain why nature works like it predicts. It posits a bending of space and time, but it does not explain the mechanism by which mass/energy causes this bending. To me this seems to be a very weak basis for claiming that "gravity is not a force". General relativity just happens to give a mathematical framework in which gravitational phenomena are explained without there being a true force.
(What I have been wondering about for some time is whether the Einstein field equations allow for an interpretation in which gravity is a "true" attractive force. I do not know the answer.)
Regarding Derek's video, I think Derek has come up with some arguments pro general relativity which aren't as strong as he seems to think:
1. That you "don't feel" acceleration if you are falling through space and bending towards a planet is not because gravity "is not a force". Gravity as a force pulls at each of the molecules of your body in exactly the same way, which is why you cannot feel it, and an accelerometer cannot measure it. (So if we ever build an interstellar spaceship that reaches near lightspeed or beyond, we should do it in such a way that every molecule of the ship and what is inside of it undergoes the same force. Even more ideally, there would be a 1g difference in acceleration, but now I am asking for too much.)
2. While general relativity removes the question why inertial mass = gravitational mass, it raises the question why it is inertial mass that determines curving of spacetime. It just shifts the question without explaining anything. (At least in my understanding.)

@ronald3836 The simple answer to your questions is that mass has no force without acceleration. Mass is not the cause of acceleration but the result of acceleration. Or, more precisely, deceleration. As the atom's acceleration factor decreases, its mass increases.
E=mc. Mass is stored energy unlocked by acceleration. Mass is inert. It has no functional properties other than length width, height.
Gravity is the result of an external force accelerating the frame of reference. What you feel is that applied force accelerating you in space. The same as dipping your hand in hot water. You feel the water molecules being accelerated.
The earth is round (curved space) because F=ma. Force equals Acceleration. As the acceleration factor increases, the mass factor decreases. Which is why the atmosphere becomes thinner as the radius increases. Because the earth is rotating on its axis, it's mass is being accelerated not only outward but forward as well creating curved space.
The 'gravity as a force' math works because framing mass as the force multiplier creates a mirror image from reality. Mass based Relativity says the atmosphere thins because there is less gravitational attraction. In reality, the laws of motion show that the atmosphere becomes less dense because of acceleration.
Which one are you going to believe? Newton's Laws of Motion that accurately describe the Earth, its atmosphere, its tides. Or some made-up mathemagical theory that doesn't hold water?
What does Relativity give you? An increase in mass with acceleration? Then why does cold water have more mass than hot water?
Time-dilation? Then why do astronauts experience accelerated heart rates and solar sails increase in temperature?
Gravitational Attraction? Why do objects with disparate mass attributes fall at age same rate?
Gravity is one frame of reference being accelerated by another frame of reference. When standing in line and I push you forward, what you feel is gravity accelerating you. When you accelerate yourself, take a step forward, you don't feel gravity.
Here is something for you to ponder regarding gravity. The Earth's rotation speed currently creates a force of 1g. If the Earth's rotation doubles, it would create a 2g force. What would happen if the Earth's orbital speed around the sun where to double instead. Would you still be subjected to the 1g force as generated by the earths rotation?

Woah I guess I took that for granted. Great exercise to demonstrate in action. Subbed. Looking forward to some vids once they are up.

Wow I have never thought of that. That is really interesting.

@terry riley Hilarious, but the directions were super clear unless you already had brain damage from shaking you head too much previously

WOW , THIS IS AMAZING !
I WANNA LEARN MORE ABOUT THIS

So what does it mean if you see no blur on both tries. Not a sniper but do like archery.

Ummm... no. maybe initially as you leave the plane, but you soon reach terminal velocity because of air resistance and cease accelerating in relation to the Earth.

@@pedtrog6443 It was a joke.

@@pedtrog6443 you're out of line, but you aren't wrong

@@wave8092 is that a geodesic pun?

@@kevinchang8090 Sort of yea

Especially since we know that the lengthy explanation is not the final word on the subject (and fails to give a real physical explanation of space-time bending anyway, it's just a mathematical model).

also your teacher : *tries to teach you something that maybe can't exist or maybe we never will be able to understand completely*

cringe

@@YorinSenpai well it doesn't really matter. Especially with how low level the physics u get taught in school is. 99% of the time u get the watered down version cus that's all that's needed

Usually school starts with teaching you the things that have already been proven wrong like the bor atom model. Just because humans are still able to understand that - in contrast to quantum physics.

@@frankkrumnow7194 And it's really all that's needed unless you pursue something more scientifically minded. If you take chemistry you will learn that everything you thought you knew was actually a simplification multiple times. 😂
The thing is that often the simple models and theories describe what is happening just fine for almost everything we need it to.

It's makes obvious why you can't even stand still inside of black hole - space is so bent it would require FTL acceleration

@@marzi_kat i dont think ftl acceleration means what you wanted to convey)

cant wrap my head around it yet

Yeah, why would it be curved. Time is added all the time, so spacetime is everexpanding, perhaps we need to accelerate to stand still. Far fetched I know.

@@manasdas8793 if you don't accelerate it will seem like everything around you is moving and you are "falling" toward earth. But if you let earth push you along it will seem like your just standing still not moving up or down.

not all acceleration tho

@@Dylan-ni1tc I guess when 2 things push on one another, there is more acceleration than just "deviation from a geodesic" ? ... I'm not sure, maybe the math would turn out it's equal, but ... probably not? I'm definitely not qualified to answer that...
(at first I thought I thought it would always be that, but now I think that you are probably right....)

@@Dylan-ni1tc all acceleration as observed from an inertial frame. Bodies in freefall only accelerate with respect to non-inertial frames.

Can someone tell me what that means

@@user-lk2wi8od9x ... I think it's the point of the video? - Best way to be told what it means is to watch the video. :D

Indeed gravity very much does exist. It is just the theory of general relativity that describes gravity not as a force but as the effect of the curvature of spacetime.
For all we can tell, that curvature is at least as illusory as gravity as a force. And I would argue it is far more illusory and just a mathematical description.
If one day someone comes up with a fundamental explanation of what spacetime really is and how mass curves it, then I may reconsider my view.

That's okay, he knew that nothing ever happens to the cameraman

@@sephikong8323 lol

Underrated comment

super(props)
render(){
}

The cameraman didn’t go through space because it was animated.

Yeah was hoping for better clarification since this contradicts the common concept of "acceleration".

Say sike right now

I have heard this argument before and the claim was that you are accelerating *in time* since space-time includes, you know... time... and time moves forward, we don't know how to stop accelerating through time.

Good thing to know I'm exercising even in my bed

This would mean that time would pass at different "speeds" depending on how close you are to a big pile of mass... and that's actually how it is. The bigger the mass, the slower the time. In black hole singularities time should literally stop. And no, I don't fully grasp that, it's just what I remember from watching so many pop science stuff about relativity.

@Ben Rowe He was flying HIGH

Gotta drink responsibly

That's way too little

Kk

@@nicholasbrown3197 I wonder if you guys get paid extra, to come up with names that will attract a flat earther to this video and what's really funny is in the beginning he even tells you the truth, gravity is not a force and then a miracle in your mind happens because you think of it as a force.. this way, they can present you with two different types of reality and flip flop between the two so that whatever you can think of will match whatever you can see, you just can't do it with one reality.. you need three or four because you will notice , Things Are Falling in his video he forgets to take into the account the Earth is spinning at Mach 1 beneath him and for some reason nothing seems to deviate but that's okay Einstein was brought in to create a whole new reality in case 4 or 5 just didn't do it for you ..you got Einstein to add a couple more.. the only question is do you live in four or five different realities at the same time or just one?? in short if you stop making videos that sounds like it's a flat Earth video.. flat earthers won't wind up telling you, you have a belief based on pseudoscience ..you think it's real but it's not
if you live the dream, remember it all works perfectly.. right up to the time you wake up and that's the problem once you wake up you can't go back to sleep.... Black Swan

My physics teacher is making our class example this and how dose this work lmao.

"everything you learned was a lie"

This exactly what happened to me rn 😭 idk if I should confront my teacher😭

I'm currently in a physics class, hope this doesn't mess me up

@@dagmbisrat3740 Classic physics is still being used successfully and not wrong, it is just a different explaination for what we see. Maybe send this to your teacher. If they are nice, they will apreciate that you take your education further.

my understanding of this is, mass shapes space, and matter (mass) follows the shape of space, and we give this following of space the name gravity. That’s how understand it?

*correction
Light doesn't have essentially no mass, it has precisely no mass. Photons are massless particles.

@@jwjustjw8946 Yes. Thank you!

I'm confused. How does a laser exert force on an object if the light beam has no mass?

@@captainmaim Light does have a mass, it does not have a rest mass. E = mc^2; m = E/c^2.

Copied

Don't feel bad, this theory of Einstein seems hard to grasp, simply because its utter NONSENSE! the ramblings of an insane mind are hard for rational people to understand. This Video of Veritasuim is so full of garbage that its amazing how so many people are sucked in by the slick presentation, while they ignore their personal sensibilities. SpaceTime is a nonsense fantasy idea. And Gravity is really a Force associated to the Earth and other Planets. Imaginary math based fantasies like SpaceTime cant be curved by real Matter. And certainly cant push real matter about. But Gravity can and does. Use your own brain.

@@xiaoxiao-kg5np Unfunny troll

@@zofar9565 Who is? If you have something to say, just say it. You think I'm a troll? Then try explaining where my statement is wrong. Just calling people names, is NOT smart.
Explian my errors or shutup!

@@xiaoxiao-kg5np Still a unfunny troll 😭😭

Cool knowledge. Thank you very much.

That's the result of early vertebrate fish evolving to remain leveled undewater, right?

That's cool

I subscribed for more lol

Fabulous...... Subscribed you👌👌👌

Not just accelerating you are also moving with a constant speed because the earth is rotating

😅😅😅😅😂😂🤣

tell her that you are busy coverting oxygen into carbon dioxide

good one

@@user-tb8zt7wg4p There's leap seconds because earth doesn't rotate constantly, but it doesn't matter. I just wanted to tell you about leap seconds

Rest in peace, Hunter

What a useless lie

@@nikhilvdhoni2161 it's called a joke

@@Skystrike70 I was just joking

@@nikhilvdhoni2161 what a useless lie

Absolutely LOL brilliant...!

He is now eating our brains !

P.S. The apple actually didn't fall on Newton's head.

Every smart aleck is rehashing the old, but another Einstein is illusive.

actually, that scientist ate that apple afterwards

Curved space time, what does that even mean?

@@Bretaxy GEODESIC

@@Bretaxy I assume it means the space time that's curved due to mass, such as space time around the sun or the earth

The "curve" is a way to represent acceleration outside your frame of reference.
To remain stationary relative to something else, the acceleration within your frame of reference must balance that outside.

Yep this is when my head exploded

General relativity:
Hello there

That poor apple was just an inertial observer, and Newton accelerated up and headbutted it.

Newton used Linux

There was never an apple to begin with. Newton had a brilliant mind but he had to dumb things down for others to understand hence the apple. In reality, who knows what was going through his mind.

@@matigekunstintelligentie 😂😂😂What do u feed your brain!!🤨😂

It is 42.0 the veritasium element number after all

He need to go high

Filled with nitroglycerin.

Yea, dunno why it took this "Einstein" guy so long to figure it out smh

@@fellipeparreiras4435
smh

@@jonathanlange1339
Smh

@@Daniel-ve8gv
Smhhh

but he doesnt experience it

@@cl4655 underrated comment

Confucius plays

I’m sure he’d be feeling quite the opposite of appreciation.

It's not the fall the kills you, it's the sudden stop, will really it's the sudden acceleration.

Is the Earth an inertial observer? What separates me from the Earth except time and definitions of physical object boundaries?

You are in a Game called MAYA

@@MartinHindenes from what I remember from school.. No, Earth is not an inertial observer since its accelerating.

@@apacheattackhelicopter8778 No! The Earth is not accelerating. The Earth is not accelerating towards the sun, it's just following a straight line through a curved space time that is curved by the sun's mass.

Whoo naruto fan😃😃

If you really want to know how cravity work I highly recommend this video krplus.net/bidio/mc6QdJSHqoTSdHY
It's not marketing

But also he was a plagiarist and a fraud apparently

@@hoodyk7342 No, he was not. Don't believe everything you read on the Internet.

We are 3 comments in and this is the most random reply’s ever
-a random k pop link and two people arguing that Einstein was a fraud

@@hoodyk7342 He was kind of a fraud, but most of his “theories” were correct, just because he possibly stole other scientists ideas doesn’t mean he was incorrect.

"dId YoU jUsT aSsUmE mY fRaMe Of rEfErEnCe?"

Me:~jumps~ . . . Well now I am

I THOUGHT THE SAMEEEEE

I didnt... Understand...

Well, even the ISS is "accelerated" due to air resistance

Thats because the video treats us a rigid body or singular particles. We have th ability to have distinguish different parts of our bodies in discrete frames. We feel our stomachs get queasy because the food inside and the fluid in our ears are behaving in different ways relative to their confinements. As the observer approached the planet he would indeed feel the difference if the curvature was great enough. He would not act in perfect synchronicity to the ship, just very very close to synchronicity.

@@walteroreilly8963 that actually makes a lot of sense , just confused about how gliding would work if this theory was true

Basically, space is distorted and your movement through time is what causes you to fall to earths core

@@lukky6648 it's not "if". This theory IS true, general relativity accurately explains gravity at these levels. This isn't some guess. This is reality

@@lukky6648 gliding works because of lift. Lift works against curvature of spacetime into the earth. Lift provides an upwards force due to air newtons 3rd law

lol

Underweight me:
...yes

THE CLEAR, TOP DOWN, ULTIMATE, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IS GIVEN BY THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Consider the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. The Earth constitutes the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE in BALANCED and UNIVERSAL relation to what is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!! (The sky is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky.) Time DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity.
By Frank DiMeglio

WHY AND HOW THE CLEAR, TOP DOWN, AND BALANCED MATHEMATICAL PROOF OF THE FACT THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY IS GIVEN BY THE FACT THAT E=MC2 IS F=MA:
Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. "Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent WITH/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY IS proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Consider the man who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Touch AND feeling BLEND, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma !!! SO, objects fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Moreover, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. The Earth constitutes the FULL DISTANCE in/of SPACE in BALANCED and UNIVERSAL relation to what is the MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/ENERGY IS GRAVITY !!!! (The sky is BLUE, AND THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky !!!) Accordingly, time DILATION ultimately proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! INDEED, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. E=MC2 IS F=ma. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Very importantly, outer "space" involves full inertia; AND it is fully invisible AND black. Think. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. Great !!! SO, a given PLANET (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH) sweeps out EQUAL AREAS in equal times consistent WITH/AS E=MC2, F=ma, AND what is PERPETUAL MOTION; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. A PHOTON may be placed at the center of WHAT IS THE SUN (as A POINT, of course), AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves ON BALANCE that E=MC2 IS F=ma, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Great !!!! Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!!! It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense. MAGNIFICENT !!!!
By Frank DiMeglio

@@frankdimeglio8216 can you send me a video that has that in it

5:31 Gravity is just like that force, it doesn't actually exist.
Hahahaha.

No, he IS saying gravity doesn't exist. What you think/see/feel as gravity is an illusion. IT DOES NOT EXIST.

@Brian Hensley acceleration.

@Brian Hensley It’s not that gravity doesn’t exist, it just isn’t like other forces per se. More specifically it would be more similar to a fictitious force. What he’s trying to say is essentially that gravity’s effects are definitely there, but that it’s not a force, but a curvature in space time.

@Brian Hensley The sides of the mug?

And nowdays some people beleive the earth is flat

Now they prevent climate change by missing school days...

ngl, they do put out alot of useless hot air in school. maybe it's not so bad.

People don't have time n money to think anymore nowadays....
Everyone was so busy nowadays

And Nicola Tesla said all Einstein’s ideas were crap!

Flat-earthers: 'I should go research this' Heliocentrists: 'You see how stupid flat tards are?'. Makes you wonder who really honors 'science', doesn't it?

dumb half-baked comment. Perfect for flat-earthers though.

Why you gotta be so dishonest, "There is no gravity".... just curvatures in space-time that cause.... GRAVITY!!!!!

What do you mean by "down"?

dude i was thinking the same thing lol

Bruh same here - like that guy was incredibly smart to be thinking that way so long ago

I am too thinking...like his iq must have been equal to the 'one way speed of light'

I think it was a different way of living back then. From documentaries and audiobooks I've consumed over the last decade, one thing that kept surprising me was how young so many scientists of past eras were, AND, that they often made great contributions in multiple fields. There was no TV after school, evenings & weekends. It was a harder time for many and perhaps these chaps were more aware/grateful for their privileged education. I guess what I'm saying is people had less distractions with more motivation & time to move through the subjects. I think they were far better educated than us at equivalent ages - at least those who managed to get an education.

@@chocolate_squiggle 💯💯💯

@@chocolate_squiggle More like the problems they were solving were much easier than the ones we're left to tackle today. Even with our superior education, we still need more of it to make progress because almost all the low-hanging fruit is gone.
Now, this isn't to say our education system is perfect; it's anything but, to the point that allowing students to skip lectures and do literally anything else with their time raises GPAs by over 15% (twice that for students of colour). But we also know that IQ is, near as we can tell, purely a measure of socioeconomic factors like nutrition and education rather than anything genetic (yes, IQ is highly heritable, but lots of non-genetic things are inherited), and it keeps going up; people at a given age do still keep getting measurably smarter every year and every generation as long as they are given access to the shoulders of giants. Despite all our many problems and issues, we're still getting smarter faster than the problems we're faced with are growing more difficult. We could definitely be doing much, much better, but it's reassuring to know we at least aren't doing bad.

Rip dude

And thanks to the kind bystander that hit the send button.

@@akshaysodhi_1044 No "thanks" to them, they didn't finish the sentence for us!!? Lol

From a bowl?

Did you die?

Ever heard of Snatoms?

@@kamikater14 if you mean the molecular model kits, i use them with my classes

Good one

Damn, does that mean that illusionists can *actually* fly?

I am the ALPHA MALE of this comment section and I command RESPECT. Right now I am ordering you to NOT view any of my videos. Instead just look at my thumbnails and be JEALOUS. Bye bye ca.

@@AxxLAfriku whaat?

@@LordDragox412 Flight is the utilization of aerodynamics. Levitation is the utilization of an inertial frame of reference. And suicide is the utilization of the Earth's acceleration towards your face. xD

I was just thinking this, with the right level of fundamentally misunderstanding this video I could see it feeding into the FE crazy ideas of the world just accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s squared.

Nonlocality and "general" relativity is about the level of flat earthers, denying all science and energy conservation laws. How will one prove that space is a magical gelly of extra time or instant energy transfer?
Gravity is an acceleration yes, because a force is the outcome (the field of) of particle charge due to spin states and vibratory conditions.
Relativity is the opposite of anything general.. It is by being relativity, "special"(localities measured)

@@deltablaze77 Isn't that what they believe, tho? Doesn't the pizza just fly through space propelled by dark energy or whatever flavor-of-the-month untestable excuse they can come up with?

@@baronvonbeandip we also have dark enery on relativility but yeah their logic make way less sense

This video made more sense in a flat earth way than any flat earth video?¿?🤷🏽‍♂️