CentralCrossing
CentralCrossing
  • 152 Videos
  • 1 620 643 조회수
Bismarck's wreck:1989-2002
Enjoy the video.
조회수: 40 917

비디오

Developing Imperator
조회수 1.4K19 시간 전
Sinking IJN Zuikaku
조회수 22K일 전
Bombing Hood
조회수 1.4K14 일 전
Developing Derfflinger
조회수 2.6K14 일 전
I-17: Bombarding the USA
조회수 74314 일 전
Developing Mikasa
조회수 3.9K28 일 전
Sinking the USS Chicago
조회수 2.4K개월 전
Sinking the USS Cairo
조회수 803개월 전
1/350 I-400 inbox review
조회수 985개월 전
Wrecks: Submarine I-400
조회수 11K개월 전
Developing Furutaka
조회수 2.4K개월 전
Sinking Shōkakū
조회수 161K개월 전
Developing Akizuki
조회수 8K2 개월 전
Sinking Nagato
조회수 6K2 개월 전
Developing Zuihō
조회수 6K2 개월 전
Developing Yamato
조회수 10K2 개월 전
The 'Nishimura submarines'
조회수 1.1K3 개월 전
Sinking the Monitor
조회수 1.9K3 개월 전
Developing Bayern
조회수 4.4K3 개월 전
Sinking Chōkai
조회수 22K3 개월 전
U-20's log: Additions and cover-up
조회수 2.7K3 개월 전
Developing König
조회수 5K3 개월 전
'Ted' Briggs: Hood's voice
조회수 3.3K3 개월 전

댓글

  • @billyholiday4947
    @billyholiday4947 2 시간 전

    Bismarck was scuttled! An eye for an eye!

  • @KuvDabGib
    @KuvDabGib 6 시간 전

    "I dont have nothing to add" after you have opened a completely new page of history for me is great statement! Please keep doing this research about Bismarck or about any other ship you want.

  • @petersmith4455
    @petersmith4455 12 시간 전

    hi from england, very interesting. its in quite good condition like the uss Yorktown cv5 is, great video

  • @Mr.MikeBarksdale
    @Mr.MikeBarksdale 16 시간 전

    Thanks for putting this up! However, I have to say, calling Bismark the most famous warship in history is a quite a stretch, especially given where she ended up. HMS Victory, the USS Enterprise, several American submarines from WW2 , and a few others would probably laugh at that claim. I've been studying naval warfare for most of my adult life and Bismark isn't what pops into my head when I think of a famous capital ship. I would even argue the Yamato is more well known today because of its size, even if she too was blasted out of the water like Bismark.

    • @centralcrossing4732
      @centralcrossing4732 12 시간 전

      It comes down to general knowledge. Like Titanic, Bismarck is a name most people know in comparison to other ships. That's thanks to the film, songs, and seemingly endless publications on it. Saying it's famous doesn't mean that it's more important or better.

    • @lynby6231
      @lynby6231 10 시간 전

      I would say the Warspite was the most famous British battleship

  • @eugeneomalley8407
    @eugeneomalley8407 21 시간 전

    It was Saturday 8th July 1989 at midnight. I was both navigator and duty watchman on board a sailing yactht on passage from the Azore islands to the Channel Islands. In the darkness ahead I noted a lit up "flotilla" which was not moving. My position was approximately N45 W17. I was puzzled. At the ocean depth at that position they could not be at anchor. Since they were stationary they were not fishing and since they were lit they were not military. As navigator I made a detailed log entry which included the precise location. Your story resolves my quandary. I was most likely in the presence of the Ballard expedition.

  • @TAllyn-qr3io
    @TAllyn-qr3io 21 시간 전

    I am a Navy veteran, was an STG aboard a destroyer in the mid to late 80’s. Makes me wonder if the sailors aboard the ship (I assume that even their parents thought the ship would never be sunk and young Fritz would be safe)…Heil Hitler’s all around. As it was sinking and they were trapped, did any … at that that time, still believe in National Socialism? Did the proud parents voice hatred for Hitler and if so, did the Gestapo take them away as further meat for their fanaticism? The price one pays for living in a cult !!!

  • @mfuller1093
    @mfuller1093 21 시간 전

    ''History's most famous warship '' ? Who says so ? Bismark had only two battles before being finished off by Royal Navy shells and torpedoes and was active for just 8 months in total. There are plenty of more famous and succesfull warships which survived the war.

    • @centralcrossing4732
      @centralcrossing4732 12 시간 전

      It comes down to general knowledge. Like Titanic, Bismarck is a name most people know in comparison to other ships. That's thanks to the film, songs, and seemingly endless publications on it. Saying it's famous doesn't mean that it's more important or better.

  • @jeffrenman4146

    Just so people understand war always is the same it's identical all the time… You build it with all the money and resources and it will be destroyed… You raise children yeah they will die they always do. You should learn this word "Democide" It means mass murder by government don't ever forget it

  • @johnhough7738

    When posted to the New Zealand naval radio station Irirangi I occasionally chatted with an old guy (civilian technician) who apparently was radioman on one of the swordfish aircraft that hit Bismarck and ruined its day. Asked about the event he had nothing much to say except that as they went over the beast he managed a glimpse, saw an officer on the uppers banging away at them with a pistol ... he said that act was what really brought it all home to him (and made it personal).

  • @NigelDeForrest-Pearce-cv6ek

    A Fascinating Summary of the Damage Done to Bismarck and the Condition of the Wreck. I Believe That Bismarck was Sunk, in Spite of the German Argument That She Was Scuttled.

  • @daniellecrawford6933

    6,000 M oh that's easy to calculate into miles

  • @victorboucher675

    Thank you.

  • @tanker335
    @tanker335 일 전

    Cameron is almost convinced HE found the Titanic.

  • @dehaney4021
    @dehaney4021 일 전

    Nicely done sir

  • @tyesalhus5604

    Awesome channel just found it.

  • @toddr737
    @toddr737 2 일 전

    On the whole, this was a fine review of what the findings of the Bismarck expeditions found.

  • @mrains100
    @mrains100 2 일 전

    Thank you.

  • @christopherchilders1049

    Very good video, extremely informative and interesting. Great job explaining what we are looking at

  • @Mustapha1963
    @Mustapha1963 2 일 전

    Among the unsung heroes of the American war effort were our damage control specialists, both on the ships and on the repair ships and shore installations. From the very beginning, the US had a decisive edge in terms of limiting damage to our ships beyond that caused by initial weapon strikes (with exceptions of course- the Lexington being among them).

  • @danielcarlson800

    I remember seeing this kit on the shelf at Toy World in 1980. It inspired me to learn modeling.

  • @christophersnyder1532

    Though James Cameron is my fellow Canadian, Robert Ballard is the superior intellect. Great as usual. Take care, and all the best.

    • @MrChickennugget360
      @MrChickennugget360 10 시간 전

      anyone know what ship that wooden 19century schooner was. Always strange that random ships found on the botton who knows why it sank and when it sank and if there were any survivors. there are thousands of shipwrecks some of them wrecks of ships lost with all hands with no trace. Somewhere out there is the München, the Waratah, and the Pacific

  • @fritzficke
    @fritzficke 2 일 전

    in the end of Bismarck's life, It is nice how the Germans and the British worked together for the common goal in sinking the ship. we can say with certainty they both succeeded and both sides can take credit for the ship's final destruction.

    • @shawnkennedy855
      @shawnkennedy855 2 일 전

      It was entirely British.

    • @fritzficke
      @fritzficke 2 일 전

      @@shawnkennedy855 In the end the Germans were trying to sink the ship as much as the British, the British could have delt the mortal blow , but it was in the interest of the Germans they did so. It is documented that the German crew had set scuttling charges, those charges certainly did not help to keep the ship afloat. The two former combatants were working for a common goal of sinking the Bismarck and they succeeded.

    • @shawnkennedy855
      @shawnkennedy855 2 일 전

      @@fritzficke If they did,it only sped up the inevitable,if at all.With or without those charges it was dead.

    • @fritzficke
      @fritzficke 2 일 전

      @@shawnkennedy855 Likewise if the British tried to save the ship they and it would have be sunk by the Germans, So the British only sped up the inevitable as much as the Germans did. The ship in the last 30 minutes had not fired a shot and was going to be sunk, one way or the other. by the British or Germans.

    • @shawnkennedy855
      @shawnkennedy855 2 일 전

      @@fritzficke I think the British were sending that ship to hell.Remember the Hood ,you know.

  • @bobyoung1698
    @bobyoung1698 2 일 전

    Even at this point in the war, Japanese carrier aviators were seeing what they wanted to see, not what was happening on the water.

  • @jamielacourse7578

    These two are an underwater menace....leave the damned thing alone already. Its a gravesite. Go spend your millions on poverty....

    • @AH-ve9iz
      @AH-ve9iz 2 일 전

      STFU they aren't destroying the wreck or messing with it.

  • @JokeFranic
    @JokeFranic 2 일 전

    dk if repeat comment but there is a British survivors interigation report with many details of final days www.uboatarchive.net/Int/BismarckINT.htm

  • @vgovger4373
    @vgovger4373 2 일 전

    4:25. that's how the crew scuttled it, the graf Spee had the same thing.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 일 전

      "scuttled it" Comedy gold !!!

    • @vgovger4373
      @vgovger4373 2 일 전

      @@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 ."scuttle" means to sink a ship quickly on purpose

    • @AH-ve9iz
      @AH-ve9iz 2 일 전

      ​@@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684ur mom scuttled her snizz after I wrecked it.

    • @patrickmccrann991
      @patrickmccrann991 일 전

      Bismarck was not scuttled, that is a complete falsehood.

    • @louisavondart9178
      @louisavondart9178 일 전

      @@patrickmccrann991 ..not according to surviving crew members.

  • @highboy72
    @highboy72 2 일 전

    war, young men die, politicians prosper.

  • @billsteele495
    @billsteele495 2 일 전

    Too much blah,blah,blah…………..

    • @centralcrossing4732
      @centralcrossing4732 2 일 전

      Welcome to a history video. It's a video of information.

    • @lastguy8613
      @lastguy8613 2 일 전

      ​@@centralcrossing4732 They probably want a refloat it, will it start, then go off and fight aliens video😅

    • @billsteele495
      @billsteele495 일 전

      @@centralcrossing4732 yeah mostly editorial information needless to tell the story.

    • @centralcrossing4732
      @centralcrossing4732 12 시간 전

      @@billsteele495 then why did you click on it in the first place?

  • @Kopernicus67
    @Kopernicus67 2 일 전

    The Japanese actually looked down on their best constructed carriers, the Shokaku and Zuikaku, as they rated each other on experience. The air groups of the four big Kido Butai carriers were hardened veterans. This is why Yammamoto sent them to Coral Sea, as it was not as important as objective AF, and thought they would make easy work of escorting the invasion force. Yamamoto violated many principles of Sun Tsu at Midway. His forces were scattered, could not support one another, and the overwhelming superiority of the Kido Butain came when ALL SIX carriers appeared in battle. At Midway, the carriers were not at full strength, the aircraft were well-maintained, but worn out, and they assumed the USN would do exactly as they predicted, not what was best for the USN. Midway was very winnable for the US. Nimitz was itching for a fight. And four carriers vs. three carries + Midway was not as bad of a bet or miracle as some of the early Fuchida-based histories made it out to be.

  • @hazchemel
    @hazchemel 2 일 전

    Thanks for your patient scholarship. Even though these ships killed my people and were trying to destroy allied ships nevertheless, my imagination illustrates your narration, especially concerning the hits and explosions, and against my wishes, I feel sorrow for the men

  • @barrywebber6481
    @barrywebber6481 2 일 전

    Forgot scuttling damage. Reason sank.

    • @centralcrossing4732
      @centralcrossing4732 2 일 전

      There is no visible damage from scuttling as it's all internal, so it plays no role in the topic at hand. The scuttling was not the reason it sank, but it hastened the inevitable as the ship was already flooding from British fire. It was a combination of the 2 factors.

  • @robbertbroere1427

    As far as i know the forms that were given to the kriegsmarine about the performance of the ship revealed that there were problems/ weaknesses at the rear end of the ship especially with the rudder. The kriegsmarine accepted the ship dismissing the issue stating that it would never be an issue.

  • @stevewheatley243

    The Germans engineered everything for strength. So how would've the Bismarck have a weak stern?

    • @SamwiseOutdoors
      @SamwiseOutdoors 2 일 전

      It has nothing to do with the structure of the stern, it's a quirk of the ship's "citadel" armor pattern. The Royal Navy relied on layers of armor belting that ran the length of the hull, with thinner belts in the bow and stern, and thicker belts over the machinery spaces and magazines. The US Navy's "All or Nothing" armor scheme relied on uniform thickness of armor belts standardized across the fleet. "Citadel" armor schemes only protected critical areas of the ship, and had little to no armor in the bow and stern. So these areas are more vulnerable to damage relative to the armored sections.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 일 전

      The reason why German warships had "weak sterns" was EVERYTHING to do with the structure of the stern, it was solely down to the fact that interwar German warship design had decided that the longitudinal frames that ran the length of a ship's hull and especially the central longitudinal keel frame all of which held the transverse hull frames in place, did NOT extend to the very stern of the ship, but instead terminated at a final transverse armoured bulkhead (frame 22) about 30 ft forward of the stern jack staff. The final 30ft of the hull stern was a relatively lightweight steel form, unsupported by ANY longitudinal frame that was instead bolted and fillet welded onto that final armoured transverse frame 30 ft from the stern. It was a construction choice that extended through several WW2 German warship designs and was the very same reason why both Lützow, and Prinz Eugen BOTH suffered stern collapses after torpedo damage.

  • @MSMW23
    @MSMW23 2 일 전

    I was watching the James Cameron Bismarck expediton on KRplus a while ago, and in Part 4 at the 4.50 minute, I saw what looked like a skull on the hanger floor. I know it's most likely a trick of the light, but it still sent a shiver down my spine at the time.

    • @JokeFranic
      @JokeFranic 2 일 전

      the part with wreck and launching of the ship are my favorite parts in that docu

    • @jujuUK68
      @jujuUK68 12 시간 전

      Thats the creepy thing about The Titanic images - that there are lots of shoes on the sea floor surrounding the boat. At first you think "Thats weird" til you realise thats where the bodies sunk to, and have been eaten/disolved over the years, leaving behind only the longer to decompose leather shoe of the wearer......

  • @gsgk9674
    @gsgk9674 3 일 전

    Fascinating, big thank you

  • @timcase2494
    @timcase2494 3 일 전

    Good video, aside from the few errors in your script. Keep up the good work though. Interesting stuff.

  • @BrianAchterberg928

    I’m surprised Jimmy Cameron didn’t or hasn’t yet made a love story movie somehow out of the sinking of the Bismarck.

  • @TheSpaceEnthusiast-vl6wx

    Thanks!

  • @user-lh5fp7bf2c
    @user-lh5fp7bf2c 3 일 전

    Im actually really surprised they found the Hood considering it BLEW UP...

    • @stigchristensen2597
      @stigchristensen2597 3 일 전

      there are some big pieces of Hood Left including her conningtower enabling identification but yes, she´s a mess compared to bismarck

  • @user-lh5fp7bf2c
    @user-lh5fp7bf2c 3 일 전

    Incredibly this hull stayed largely intact after going 3 miles very rapidly towad the hard rock bottom of the Atlantic Ocean , and apparently snowboarding down a 3000 ft volcano... wonder what SpongeBob was thinking?

  • @user-lh5fp7bf2c
    @user-lh5fp7bf2c 3 일 전

    Bismark was scuttled. We all know this...... looks like most of the penetrations were on the thinner upper belt with a few on main belt. But near the end i think Rodney was shooting at poi t blank range at a motionless Bismark so eventually it was gonna sink . Plus everyone was dead or dying and all others were in water already.

    • @user-uq6sz6po3d
      @user-uq6sz6po3d 3 일 전

      Well the surviving crew members claimed they scuttled the ship but whether they succeeded, just tried or it was a prideful boast is unknown. I was hoping Cameron's expedition would be able to differentiate scuttling from shell or torpedo damage but the video made no mention of it. An ongoing mystery!

    • @zackakai5173
      @zackakai5173 3 일 전

      Um no, "we all" don't "know" this. The FACT is that nobody knows for absolute certain. And frankly it's a largely academic point, since even if it was scuttled, gunfire and torpedoes from the Royal Navy would have sunk it shortly afterward anyway. The end result was the same either way.

  • @TheJazsa80
    @TheJazsa80 3 일 전

    Another one pushing the German capital ship 'weak stern' nonsense. German capital ship stern failures all occurred after taking hits in that area. If the sterns were just falling off whilst sailing then it would be a design problem.

    • @xt6wagon
      @xt6wagon 2 일 전

      Battleship implies line of battle. A single hit took 100% of rudder control.

    • @shawnkennedy855
      @shawnkennedy855 2 일 전

      It was a mediocre ship as it was.

    • @ARGONUAT
      @ARGONUAT 일 전

      So touchy. No soup for you!

    • @Revolver1701
      @Revolver1701 일 전

      @@ARGONUAT🤣🤣🤣👍🏆

    • @crufflerdoug
      @crufflerdoug 18 시간 전

      I dunno, sure looks like it was weak.

  • @MB-nn3jw
    @MB-nn3jw 3 일 전

    I have Ballard’s, Mearns’ and Cameron’s books and videos on the Bismarck, but I have never decided to compare damage reports/conclusions. A welcome video on the subject, and well put together. Thanks.

  • @lifesahobby
    @lifesahobby 3 일 전

    Cheers

  • @toddkurzbard
    @toddkurzbard 3 일 전

    12:14 "...Their orders were so erotic..."

  • @toddkurzbard
    @toddkurzbard 3 일 전

    ARGO, not ARGOS.

  • @paulhubsch5111
    @paulhubsch5111 3 일 전

    "Battleship Bismarck" by Garzke, Dulin & Jurens features a section dedicated to the wreck in crazy detail, highly recommended (the entire book actually)