Food Theory: Should I DELETE This Video?

Yk they dont call him THE youtube businessman for nothing, he certaintly knows how to do things right

I don't know about that last one. MatPat is definitely trying to avoid drama, but we are talking about the internet. I'm sure someone will try to start some drama just because they can. Sadly, I don't saying something like healthy grass is green wouldn't start drama.

@@kayleescruggs6888 people will start drama about it but the way it was done nobody whos opinion actually matters in this area at least the area he exists in prominetly will actually catch on to it and he most likely wouldent be affected since anyone with reasoning would ignore most the drama, he had to deal with this drama because someone with reasoning did say something about his video being bad, which other people latched onto.. If theres nobody with reasoning disputeing it then it doesnt matter

@@Neoillia looks at Optimus

Not just that but they also keep it intresting to watch! what an outstanding team they are

Far more than she was owed, imo.

Yes. It wasn’t her fault that the haters picked mat as their target. They just watched the video and we’re like: only one tiiiiny little thing that they got wrong that was kinda correct? Well let’s make it seem like it’s mega incorrect!

Yeah I didn't see her criticizing him directly or something, she just expanded on it. The people are the ones completely twisting and blowing it out of proportion, because they were already biased against him, just like the media headlines and articles are doing most of the time. This is why it's very important for people to not bindly believe in something they just heard online before looking into the whole picture and making their own research before making a judgment. The easiest thing is to jump on a hate train with limited information for things people don't fully understand or because it doesn't align with their personal views.

thats cool and all but you used the word heck so you're a child

@@bryceinnerst7963 So edge, much adult!

I bursted out laughing 😂😂

That's not the intro buddy

@@retrothelegend571 intro is short for introduction, those are just animated sequences that recaps what the thing is about and then they reveal or "introduce" what its called

@@DeletedDevilDeletedAngel yes that what the word intro means but it's not how we use it, for example the actual intro for food theory does introduce or say what a video is about, saying hello welcome to (channel name) ain't an intro

Yeah, for example, I'll definitely tell this to my dad who just, doesn't like milk in general. And neither do I. But I love broccoli, so it really is just something to consider

Kids don't *need* milk... kids *need* calcium... Kids can tolerate milk... They are perfectly fine if they get that calcium from other sources though (like, say, tofu)

My first thought was the BBQ episode lol. But he's made several episodes about meat.

that would be an interesting video

Lol, this is so true

@@sapphirerubin9510 it's already an actual video i think.

And I would watch all 60 minutes of it

lmfao 💀

*Sound of vegan shrieking in the background*

To make the buffet bankrupt we must choose meat less the carbs

@@sod6290 exactly, only meat.

Exactly what a vegan would say

Ann seems to enjoy going after people with degrees to see like the all knowing food expert. Lets not forget how educated both Mat and Steph (and their entire team) is. Its a little off putting how she tried to do a take down well known creators for her own person gain

She was right about sugarlogie though.

The fact that she removes the context around what he says in referencing his video to discredit it, speaks alot for itself

@@whitepaint7870 no she wasn’t. Sugarologie made a response proving her claims and showing that Ann was oversimplifying the original process

@@emmabrook9691 then she made a comeback video, and i saw other people who tried the icing hack agree with ann.

Not surprising, since he had done this for ten years (if I'm not wrong)

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

Dont read my name!😑.

@@GriffinZambia your trying to do a rickroll

Matpat after defending himself:
But hey, that's just a theory

Or turning eating cake made from ice creams from different day food restaurants.

Or getting excited because his wife prepared TWO 13-pound Thanksgiving turkeys one year

Or the one where he ate a bunch on burgers to confirm the best stack order

Bro I died laughing because I forgot about that video

Also like, why do people get so offended when confronted with facts that say that some aspects of a vegan diet have scientific backing?

and she has done it again! literally last week, but this time to a small content creator who's tip actually works, she doesn't seem to have bothered to actually watch the original video though, shame

Remember matpat can not be criticized for he is an exeption

@@SoratheProtogen Im not saying he can't be criticized, but the critism here was widely ridiculous, lacked critical thought and research, and accusatory for no real reason. She then doubled down equally hostile, again for no real reason.

​@@SoratheProtogenread the comment before you respond thx 😊

@@SoratheProtogen remember you can not be criticized for your reading capabilities are an exception 💀

it made me wheeze LOL

Was so funny 😂😂😂

When I saw that I was like oh, I see.

good job you explained the joke

I had that exact same thought when seeing that clip. I see the subject framed in what to do as an adult to get that calcium if you can’t adequately process milk. So it kind of makes it a moot point in saying good luck getting the kid to eat something they are not really the target demographic for. (In this narrow context)

I was going to point that out too, good catch!

Because only 1/3 people can drink milk as an adult
But the majority of that third are 1st world countries.
So it it is a viable argument

But this much kale in front of anyone then... Same result

Happy Edward Elrick noises.

She needs content. Her channel has grown quite boring over the years and now she is constantly merching her cookbook.

She barely used his video, it was under 1 min and she used his video alongside other creators that made the same claim that Mattpat did

​@@jeanismael1753it was three and a half minutes, but nice job outing yourself as one of her attack dogs.

In fairness, the same could be said on MatPat's end. He could have easily settled this by messaging the food channel about her content, rather than make a drama video.

​@@pharogryph7235and she could have easily not throw shade at anybody
Ya know just saying 🤷

Dont read my name!😑

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

@@MbitaChizi then don’t comment under my comment ;-;

If anything, she was more rude than he was

@@Ryan_2218 definitely yes!

Agreed!

Agreed!

you can say that again 😁

I agree but I think a better statement would be: “One mistake doesn’t make a person completely wrong”

@@CuriuMusic that's also true

i agree

that is the reason i came to check this video out! I was sad to hear about the other times, what she's doing to sugarologie by remaining silent on HER error is not cool

THIS!!! shes deleting criticism comments to make herself look good!!

There was also a video where she "compared" darker and brighter colored baking sheets for heat conductivity, and completely ignored the materials said baking sheets were made of 😂 Helen Rennie made a good breakdown of that one if i remember correctly

@@kyushirokun i think that they misunderstood each other cus they were arguing about diff things, but it's surprising how Ann basically always thinks shes right no matter this time for sugarologie and for helen

She also promotes an MLM

@Autumndapple Exactly!

He was still wrong about the Kale lol.

It's especially correct, considering how experts are still not certain about the topic either.

@@KitsyX Yes, and he commented on what a silly mistake it was. But the main point still stands.

@@KitsyX don't eat kale then. Stop hating him. You are doing more wrong than his whole video on the topic

Uhh he sat on a couch get it right/j

GT Live viewers: *grabs the snacks*

@@smittenpizza6991 MY BAD SJSJSJ

@@smittenpizza6991 They worded it right, it’s not wrong

@@gub2142 congrats you missed the joke

me too

Yea the day you grow up and realize facts don't actually exist lol. It's a theory and all theories are subject to criticisms

​@@Wake.Up.Fact exist idiot

“ It is precisely facts that do not exist only interpretations”

Exactly this. Most people who don't like matpat have literally never watched more than out of context clips of his videos, taken and warped specifically to make him look bad. It's absolutely wild.

Dont read my name!😑..

Theory ChannelS*
But we are both correct, so no dramas, just insert a Futurama clip here 👍

Dont read my name!😑

Жжжжжж

True

WHY ARE THERE A BUNCH OF BOTS HERE
HOLY ####
(And im not talking about the Mustache guy)

Yes, but it always seems so aggressiv lul

Glad to know I'm not the only one XD

Yes I genuinely jumped up when I saw it

Literally same lol

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

Dont read my name!😑..

Sometimes, and hear me out here - sometimes the internet has the right to criticize and point out when someone’s done something off. Crazy, I know.

@@localmenace3043 did you even watch the video bro?

@@localmenace3043 so what was off?

Dont read my name!😑..

The weakest part of this video is when Mat says “so who was right?” Even if he correctly assesses that they were both right, it’s still reinforcing the “being right is what matters” idea.

@@zaxtonhong3958 So how do you thing he should have put it? IDK but providing a science piece should be about correctness/being right ( with the best information currently available)

I liked the outcome of this because it shows how the decision ultimately comes down to you and that you should probably do more research because wow food is complicated. Both did give examples of how to do it though, like Mat pointing out how that much kale can fit in a smoothie if you are down for that or Anne talking about calcium in non dairy milks.

@@zaxtonhong3958 I actually felt like that was meant to emphasize the opposite. He spent a lot of the time showing how both people are right and that it's complicated and then turned around and said "so whose right?" To emphasize just how unimportant that question is because clearly it is up to personal decision and research.

Can’t wait for Ann to debunk it back

​@@sonicpoweryayShe didn't, she had no research and was very unprofessional

lol ann was right here, he is just playing with words

@@adarshminj2543 no, Ann was clearly misrepresenting serving sizes to seem right (using a massive plate of Kale when you could easily make a smoothie of it smaller than a glass of milk). Completely twisted the points made in the video("a kid wouldn't eat that much kale" when the point was adult alternatives because ADULTS often can't get calcium through milk as easily), and clearly threw some passive aggressive shade by hinting at plagiarism.
The idea that someone pointing out actual scientific approaches to this question, is somehow "playing with words" is disingenuous and just flat out wrong. You're just jumping on a hate train for the sake of hating matpat.

@@adarshminj2543 source: trust me bro

yeah, but the way he manipulates the data and the situation. what kind of person would do something like that? I would never want to be on his bad side.

lol not really. The bar for men is so low. If Ann had put out the same energy that he did in this video, I'd bet she'd get ripped apart for being bitchy and rude. But meanwhile, MatPat is super condescending and rolls his eyes in response to her. If that's signs for significant character, then that's kinda yikes dude.

@@sabrinagessert2742 the thing is - he had to really go out of his way to manipulate the data to show that he was "right". I wonder if that was just his ego or if it had anything to do with him being corrected by a woman. I guess we'll never know.

@@blanktom6049 "Manipulating data" is an interesting way to see it, since he isn't trying to persuade anybody to take a side. He clearly boils the video down to saying that he doesn't think anybody's really in the wrong.
And I don't feel like this should have to be defended, but he's not manipulating data, he is bringing up another perspective, like Ann did, to show that nutrition in and of itself has many other factors than just what is stated on the nutritional label of a product.

@@paulj4955 This will probably be deleted as i've tried posting this several times and each time it gets removed. But here's my take on one example of how he is manipulating the information (re broccoli):
1) In his video he compares a serving size of broccoli to a serving size of milk, even though earlier in the video he says his team didn't compare by serving size, they compared gram to gram
2) The source he uses has 1 cup of broccoli as 180 mg of Calcium even though every other source you encounter has 1 cup of broccoli well under 100mg.
3) All other sources include both volume (cups) and weight (grams). He made a point that his team doesn't use serving size due to it's variability so they used grams. Why didn't he use grams for broccoli if it's so readily available?
The answer is that every other source that is out there would show that you would absorb far more calcium by milk (gram per gram or serving by serving) except for the one dubious source he pulled, which coincidently goes against the methodology he stated earlier in this video.

Tru Dat

Yes

former hs valedictorian

He's a smart and knowledgeable guy with a lot of competent and dedicated people, they're all huge dorks pretty much. People be expecting a lot from 'em and people be weird about the team and creator because they're relatively big and popular, it ain't surprising but what can ya do?

Tru bro

troll commenters are the enemy. but in this case they led to an interesting video ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@djestouff Very true.

@@djestouff 💯 AGREE!

@@djestouff 💯 AGREE!

Sometimes there are no villains, and sometimes no heroes

Exactly, she's a Karen who wants to speak to the manager.

yeah it's the adults the kale are for,m specifically lactose intolerant regions or regions where the milk is expensive...
like he explains
in the 20 seconds right after the clip she criticizes

@@ghetoknight7801 The problem is that she wasn't doing a debunking, rebuttal, or response to his video, so his focus on adults in _his_ video wasn't relevant to _her_ video. It was an aggregation of assertions from various videos about whether or not milk is good for you, including a brief clip from MatPat's, that she used as a jumping off point to discuss what's being said about the topic in other videos, what's misinformation, and what are some other things to consider.
Additionally, lactose intolerance isn't the only reason why a parent might be hoping there are adequate substitutes for the milk a child needs. That's part of the reason Ann focused on servings. If you're, say, a parent who cut out gluten when being gluten-free was popular, or you're a vegan, Ann's video shows that if you decide not to give your child milk, you can't just make them eat a serving of kale and call it even. You're going to have to figure out how to get them to consume that sort of volume of something like kale _multiple times a day._ (As one example.)

here is dr. mc. dumb dumb

Yeah that point stuck out to me too.
In general I don’t have any preferences towards either creator, but it also really doesn’t make sense to compare serving sizes to me. I, a veggie loving adult, cook down large amounts of kale for a single serving fairy regularly. Someone who likes veggies less probably eats smaller portions… also neither video talks about this. But I don’t think anyone gets all their daily vitamins through a single serving of any one food….you have to eat a balanced diet throughout the day
All said, I have no intention of removing dairy from my diet lol.

Dont read My Name😑.

@@SilverDusk1 I just try to make sure to report them as spam as soon as I see them.

Since this is a top comment there a great chance matpat might see this so brew channel isn’t actually a like team channel it’s owned by a company idk what their name but there is like 5 other channel like it I have seen I video exploring this topic in depth but I don’t remember where

@@SilverDusk1 jts actually not a bot it was a person and ot was actually really good advertising for a cool thing, follow the trail guys
If its not a link tht links outside of youtube i dont see the harm in curiousity
Edit: it was more like an arg easter egg hunt ^-^ e eryone in the comments at the end tht followed it was happy and pleasantly surprised

@@aidenflame1576 It's still lots of spam.

he has a team tho and a good one at that

@@killnet5638 begone bot!

True!!!

@@killnet5638 no one asked

This was really well said 👌

I would watch MatPat do a 90 minute dissertation on dissertations.

@@kylerivera3470 I agree with both, the passion he gives is *chefs kiss* 🤌🏻

i would watch a portion of the vid because im confused by dissertation.

I came to see if anyone else had said this yet, I knew in my heart that I couldn't be alone. I would watch that video 100%

SECONDED!! Proposed seconded, get it built!

Dont read My Names!

hey checkmark person

Hey there czsworld!

@@GriffinZambia i won't, you bot

Love ya content

I know, im very impressed and i genuinely want to learn that from him and the team. Dk where to start tho

@@elle7503 Just click a video that interests you, they separated the channels into their genres, so just pick video games, films, food, or style. Whatever you want.

He is very professional. Ann is not professional at all and she did zero research when making comments about food theory. Anns use of serving size comparison proves no one should listen to her.

@@charlieblank3393 I know lol ive been watching for years. I meant i want to learn how to keep your cool and rational side when arguing, and not stoop to their level even when they get disrespectful. I find that very admirable cs even the most calm person won't take it this professionally when being confronted directly.

@@Patrick1985McMahon She has the background information and makes decently logical conclusions on baseline information, however, she didn't do the follow-up research and attempt to even get in contact to find any background information on it which is absolutely abhorrent for someone claiming to be using factual, proven information such as her, You need to do your research.

Well said!

I like his voice, the scripts, and the editing - and I like long edutainment vids...and Google actually knew the word "edutainment" yet constantly misspells everything else.

I will see you both there when the video drops

@@frostkitsunelive7661 ill join you all

I would too I think Matt would be an amazing teacher

Me too, extra points because it's an interesting topic

I've been a fan of both youtubers for a while now and it was nice to see how this all played out. I'd be interested in Ann's take on his response but I don't think it's necessary either. They both can move forth with great content as usual.

I agree with you, Emma. And like you, Stephen, I would love to see Anne's response, if any.

​@@stephen1896 Anne has replied. She made very immature comments about this ordeal on her original video. I can no longer support her.

@@kittykitties4220 can I see where? /genq

@@jumpyyjasminee5315 Go to her original video on milk, look at the comments, and find the ones that say "How To Cook That" replied

Also you see in the OG video the thumbnail comes from a literal commercial!
(We see a clip/gif, you can tell its a remade frame from the logo on the milk in both versions)

Are we watching the same video? His tone throughout the whole video sounds so pissy and offended to me. Nothing like his usual enthusiasm.

​@@Broeckchennow that you mention it, I can kinda hear it? But that's pretty much a given since he's literally being accused left and right of things he most definitely is not. He's still human, after all.

@@aquila7602 I'd like to recommend to you "Emily Ruins Adam Ruins Everything" for comparison. Same basic premise - edutainment show being challenged on their information. But I'd like you to look at the incredible difference in tone.
If you provide content you frame as "science", you're quickly held to a pretty high standard. It's especially important in food science, because that's an area especially riddled with mis- and disinformation. Someone who loves to spread information should be able to put their ego aside enough to not bristle at every challenge and "attack", but instead reevaluate their approach and research.
I mean, consider what happened here. A food *scientist,* an expert in the field, held up a clip of misleading information as one of many examples of similar sentiments and added some context to it. Matpat *could* have ignored the rude comments and go to the more levelheaded scientist directly, developing a better piece of information collaboratively. Mat mentions, for example, the issues of comparing food on a nutritional level. A food scientist is the perfect person to consult on this and develop a good measuring or comparison system with.
It could have been an amazing collaboration. Ann is often open to comparing approaches and developing experiments together, she has approached other creators about this before when they challenged *her* information. So why did Mat instead focus on the rude comments and on how he was totally actually correct?
In the video I recommended above, Adam is at one point confronted with a similar issue where the information he provided was correct, but the way he presented it gave people the wrong impression. His response about that? Admitting that if he wants to educate, being correct is not is only duty. He also needs to communicate the correct information well and understandably.
I totally get being angry. But like... if you love truth, information and science, and if you love educating people, you should be able to vent off-camera and approach your script and performance without that emotional bias. At least enough to focus on "did I do this right?" over "am I technically correct?".

@Broeckchen That is fair but it has to go both ways and Ann Did say some things that look a little accusatory especially for what was considered wrong/misleading

Dont read My Name😑.

This is why i usually dont care about people making call out videos about him

@@GriffinZambia bro shut up its not the place for that

The fact they had to release even a single video about the research they do shows how blind some people are. It's obvious in pretty much every video that they all do their research.

You don't even need to look at KRplus to know this. Just seeing how the mainstream media works, and it's clear that people are so used to relying on others to do the research for them and having that information packaged with a spicy label (See: pretty much everything from the sinking of the Maine to Russiagate) that not only are reactionary videos expected but will automatically be popular.

Yes, but her measuring system is just moronic. Serving size to serving size comparisons are one of the dumbest things you can ever do, because as this video shows, you can call just about anything a serving size.
That inconsistency results in comparisons that actually end up giving no useful information, and often times tend more towards misinformation. Again, as this video shows, milk has more calories than coke, but simply because milk claims a smaller serving size, this truth is distorted. Is it misinformation? Not exactly, since the nutrition per serving size is correct. But is this done in a way to trick people into thinking that this product has less calories than it does? Yes, absolutely.
The know people don't pay that much attention generally to calculate the true calories in everything they pick up, so they try to put a low serving size so they can have lower calories printed on the label. Look at most snacks and drinks. A small bag, which realistically one person will consume, is often shared up into multiple servings for the reason above.
This is why "serving size" is a garbage metric to conpare by. Mat knows it but is too kind to call her out on it, and she knows it but is trying to twist things to fit her stance.

@@envytee9659 please post this as an individual comment lol, I'd hate if people miss it just bcs it's a reply

@@envytee9659 Honestly the worst part is how she took a single line of incorrect information out of a whole page of correct information and used that as a jumping off point for criticism. That’s deliberate misrepresentation since they seem to outright avoid mentioning the other information and arguably worse than the claim of plagiarism she made at the start of her video. Honestly, i’m just glad ATLEAST she ensured the information was *Technically correct*, because everything else was… just ugh.

Yes please, I supposedly have trouble absorbing nutrients but no clear cause has been found, if it's how I'm preparing or pairing things i could really use a team of researchers figuring it out.

same, it's hard not to enjoy what Matt and his team create

Me too i can watch 90 minute long video if its from food theory channel.

We just wathed long hour vídeos about old Nickelodeon shows.

Clearly this is the next logical step.

SAME xD

i agree with this

education and education... heh. You have a good point, though! Matpat's videos are about many kinds of different(sometimes obscure) topics but have a charm to them that make them really easy to listen to. Matpat and his team is pretty darn good!

I also thing that education does not go with education

Education with education...something truly difficult indeed

oh. It's definitely diverse. hahahaha

Exactly, especially when human biology/anatomy is a whole other can of worms that is varied on so many aspects of how you're already built (through genetics and different hereditary or environmental defects to your body). Both nutrition and the human body are so complex that, once put together, is like trying to make a never ending science experiment with too many independent and independent variables to keep track for. I give MatPat credit for making all of the complexities he researches for days maybe even weeks, sound interesting, enjoyable to learn and digestible. I already have trouble focusing on stuff, but he makes it interesting in a way I many others are able to learn from it and enjoy it. Overall, I greatly dislike the fact that so many people were so quick to bash Food THeory along with other theory videos without taking a step back and thinking for a second. Perhaps looking in the description or doing their own research or- heck- even watching the rest of the video MatPat got "called out" on.

Literally this is the best possible comparison. Kudos.

Yes, an episode on this would be great. I for one can't figure out what constitutes a serving, (not that I care, I just eat until I am satisfied).

Dont read my name!

@@GriffinZambia 🤓

@@antiloser-NFS technecally all of the servings of food eat *should* fit in the palm of your hand. At least that's what I heard from my medical teacher (and honestly, it's probably just my American brain, but that felt like too little..)

@DON'T WATCH MY VIDEOS ok i wont

did you forget that she started the commentary by throwing immense shade at mattpatt by implying he steals content and thumbnails? because to me it feels like one side is being overly aggressive when discussing a gray area which is supposed to be their expertise, while the other is a hobby guy bringing forth a slew of evidence and reasoning while being courteous and more informative

@@ThaGr1m I did forget, my bad

@@ThaGr1m You got a point there. She was already in passive-aggressive mode when she started off with "he steals thumbnails and contents", giving her audience an unfair bad impression from the beginning. I guess she was trying to play the role of a "judge of youtube justice, who gives punishment to the criminal youtuber, Mat!!!" rather than calmly debunking the error or their difference in their stance. Kind of an unprofessional move.

can you dumb this down my brain is running on a delay

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

kinda was thinking threw the whole video they some how falled behind

Heck yeah!

Your last sentence is absolutely correct. I'm a food technology major and we NEVER use serving sizes for nutritional informations. It's way too inconsistent.

The fact a so called "food expert" seriously says we should do exact comparison's between food by serving size is laughable.
Either this person isn't nearly the expert she claims to be or she just wanted to take shots at Matpat and used that to make him seem wrong.

Yesssssss

EXACTLY. I absolutely adore kale and my mom cooks with it and every single time I eat her food I ask her why she didn't put more kale. Well, she put a lot, it just shrunk!

As a fellow vegetable sauté-er that’s still a lot of kale for one meal. Maybe like 4-5 meal

i use spinach in my stir fry. one whole bag of spinach cooks down to about 3 forks worth of spinach when cooked.

Those people already hated matpat and were just waiting for an opportunity

@@alexoxo1 lol that makes sense....and it also seems sad.

EXACTLY

A _food_ theory.

Your view comes from a problem in general perception.
Theory is something that is correct but not fully understood, as such if something is "just a theory" then it is a fact that was not explained.

@@kintsuki99 pretty sure that is just in scientific terms.

@@OliverSierraW yeah we really need two words for theory and scientifc theory to prevent this argument/misinterpretation

A diabetic that reads 5-10 food labels a day knows better then a person that dedicated their entire life to researching food.

@@nebojsajovic2177 bro theres no way youre saying this guy is wrong. servings sizes are different. the entire point of a serving size is how much the vendor thinks the person will eat. did you not listen at all? i could say a single kayle leaf is a serving size for me, while 17 gallons of milk are also a single serving size for me.

Puro 🤯

@@nebojsajovic2177 A "serving size" is as small as companies can make it so that they can say their product has a lot of them. No food scientist is going to tell you that you cant eat more than 1 cup of ravioli for dinner.

​@@nebojsajovic2177 because for one it's information that's important to their survival and for the other it's just one more metric she needs to know about in her professional life.

They're both Technically Correct ©®™. The best type of correct!

Dont read My Name😑.

Good on you MatPat! :D

Exact same response. I appreciate how he handled the it.

Ignoring the fact that she tried to taint his reputation at the start of her video.

same here

fym

Dont read my name!😑.

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

and he does generally at least 2 of these a week across his 4 channels, plus he does the not lives and he is often researching many other theories at the same time. I saw annes video and wondered if matt was going to respond cause I was like I feel like she doesn't know the history on his channels and how much he puts into it.

it' kind of shitty Ann specifically took a 20 second clip out of context as well ngl and commented with a condescending tone. I think this fuelled the toxicity in man's original video more. Wish her reputation gets on the run now realising what she has done.

@@TheDeathLove Honestly I've watched her channel, there's a high chance that she just saw that one video and assumed he was another content farm. I doubt she meant actually hate at Mat

I mean these people have made a whole channel about educating people on thing about food, food myths, and experiments that a majority of people don't bother to look into (which includes me)

The only point I can raise is Hazbeen Hotel

@Hiding in Public ^^

Me: A subnautica player:
Matpat: UTTERLY MISREPRESNTS THE GAME I PLAY
Me: Complains with everyone else in the comments section:
KRplus: removes downvotes

So people don't think i'm just sucking up or voiding any valid criticism of him:
I made a video on my side channel debunking the complete BS that was in the Persona game theory - but frankly even most Persona fans don't know the lore (which you can see in most the responses to Matt's video that get just as much wrong as he did). Once again, not ignoring past faults, but if we put a whole team worth of blame on one guy, we gotta put a whole team worth of credit too.

It is called a THEORY. Theories don't have to be 100% right anyway, and they still make good content :)

Dont read my name.😑

MatPat is a brain burner!(Правдивое видео):.
krplus.net/bidio/k6WJqoCFqYSYmWE

@@MbitaChizi Either it's a rickroll or an ARG.

its called a theory after all not facts

4 channels

I am sorry, but there is far too much evidence that MatPat is a robot.

"but that's just a theory" is a phrase people tend to ignore a lot

@Dave Allen i reckon he’s joking on that one lol. maybe he is an AI and we’d have no idea :/

yeah but this channel isnt about fictional works he should keep it factual

@@BiFiGames by the that logic it's okay for me to call you a rapest and it's okay because it's just a theory.

People of the Internet are illiterates.
Change My Mind

@DON'T WATCH MY VIDEOS mate bugger off with your spam

more people need to list sources

@@aidenpearce5275 if I come across something on the internet without sources listed I simply disregard it, more people need to do that.

@@WhoPlaysTheFool yeah, there's also the people who ignore 20 sources telling them their wrong and points to one singular one that agrees

Yeah, that’s true. Not being able to guess the plot of a movie that hasn’t come out is different than being wrong about the results of a specific study.

I know, right? It’s like the judge asking Rhodes to read a specific sentence about the Ironman suit!

@DON'T WATCH MY VIDEOS shut your mouth bot.

As someone who watches food and game theory (not that i dont like film theory i just dont watch movies as often) ive seen alot of people hating on the channel ever since the twitch video he did and at this point it just feels like a meme to hate on mattpatt

The word 'Theory' holds more weight in scientific circles than most other people's 'facts'. In other words, for some there is no 'just' when talking about theory.

"Theory" means something different in the vernacular than it does in scientific jargon. In the vernacular, or layman's terms, it means a guess, claim, or supposition that may or may not be provable. In science, it means a claim, hypothesis, or question that has been tested to the point of being confirmed as fact. Saying "it's just a hypothesis" doesn't have the same ring to it, though.

@@jneff6456 makes sense why people get angry, but it’s all in the fun and not to make anything serious

Yeah, i remember when it was so cheap it was a throwaway garnish on basically EVERY dish even from cheapo restaurants

My aunt would put tons of kale into my eggs and hotdogs. Maybe I’m being overdramatic since I don’t remember that much, but I think that would be great bowl to put in with the eggs and hotdogs. Definitely eatable in a day.

It's good when you have a professional prove someone correct