South Korea vs Japan: Who owns Dokdo/Takeshima?

Beautiful art.

nice art

wow only two replies
i mean three

Korea rejected proposal of ICJ. Maybe they understand they become loser.

당연히 일본의 땅입니다.
하지만 한국은 인정하지 않을 것입니다.
한국은 원래 남을 내리고 자신을 올리는 나라니까요.
한국의 유튜브는 타국을 비난하고 조롱하고 자국을 찬양하는 영상들이 수억단위의 누적 조회수를 가진 채널들이 수백개 있는 나라입니다.
한국을 조심하세요.

Not dokdo takeshima is japan island. japan occupy korea and there is a definite document.
krplus.net/bidio/e7SCgnNihWzGqZw

😂😂😂😂😂

@赤霞 imagine taking a joke seriously, smh

@GamerGrey林 too tiny

@赤霞 It is a joke man, chill

_british empire joined the chat_

We are Korean🇰🇷Dokdo is japan🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷🌷🇰🇷

@@fcwgsvfmjbgq3214 He is Japanese

다케시마를 돌려주세요

@@user-tq4kc5mz6t 네 안돌려줍니다.
아니지, 안 줍니다

안녕하세요~ 한국인입니다. (번역하기 쉬운 말투를 사용하여 한국어가 자연스럽지 않을 수 있습니다.)
독도는 명백히 한국의 땅입니다.
지금부터 제가 독도가 한국 땅인 이유와 일본 측이 주장하는 근거를 반박해보도록 하겠습니다.
(이 글에 수정사항이 있어 2022년 3월 12일 기준으로 수정하였습니다)
첫번째로, 지리적인 이유입니다.
맞습니다. 한국 본토와 독도 사이의 거리는 216.8km이고 일본 본토와 독도 사이의 거리는 212km로 더 가깝습니다.
만약 당신이 이래서 독도가 일본 땅이라고 생각했다면, 당신은 멍청한 생각을 한 것입니다
독도는 한국의 섬인 울릉도와 87km 떨어져있고, 일본의 섬인 오키제도와 158km 떨어져있어 한국 땅입니다.
애초에 독도와 가장 가까운 섬이랑과의 거리를 측정해야하는데, 일본 정부에서 어설프게 진실된 자료로 사람들을 속이니
한숨이 쉬어지는군요.
둘째로, -신라 시대 때, -1900년대, -1906년 3월 29일,
-1520년, -18세기 후반, , -프랑스 지리학자 '당빌"이 제작함
에서 우산도(오래 전 한국이 사용하였던 독도의 명칭)는 한국의 영토라고 증명하였습니다.
셋째로, 일본이 독도가 한국 땅임을 인정한 자료들입니다.
1667년, 일본이 독도를 처음 알게되어 적은 문헌인
에서
''은주는 북해 가운데에 있는데 오키섬이라고 한다.
술해 사이를 두낮 한밤가면 마츠시마가 있다.
또 한낮거리에서 독도(다케시마)가 있다.
이 두섬에는 사람이 살지 않는데
고려를 보는 것이 마치 운주에러 은주로 보내는 것 같다.
그러므로 일본의 건지는 이주를 끝으로 삼는다''
라고 적혀있습니다.
무슨 의미냐고요?
쉽게 말해 일본의 북서쪽 경계를 오키섬(이주)으로 삼는다는 말입니다.
여기서 '이주'는 나고야 대학의 교수인 이케우치 사토시 교수가 오키섬을 가리킨다고 논문을 발표했고 현재 아무도 이를 반박한 사람은 나오지 않고 있다고 합니다.
즉, 일본은 독도를 처음부터 자신의 땅이 아니라고 인정했습니다.
이뿐만 아니라 일본은
-메이지 정권이 1877년 3월 29일 독도가 한국 영토임을 인정하였습니다.
-1695년 12월 일본 막부에서 울릉도와 독도가 돗토리번 소속이 아니라고 하여,
일본 어부들에게 고기잡이를 못하게 하였습니다.
-8세기, -1962, -1877, -1821, , , -1655 등 공식 지도에 독도와 울릉도가 포함되어 있지 않습니다.
그리고 일본은 에 독도가 있다고 주장하는데, 이건 정부가 만든게 아니라
나가쿠보 세키스이가 개인적으로 만든건 아시죠?
심지어 는 위도 경도마저 엉터리인 지도입니다.
또한 일본이 우기고 있는 에서 대놓고 일본이 독도를 부를 때 사용했던 죽도와 송도라는 명칭으로 독도가 한국의 영토 색과 같은색으로 색칠되어 있습니다.
네번째 이유입니다.
1945년 7월 26일, 포츠담 선언 내용입니다. 이 선언에서는, 독도가 포함되어 있지 않았습니다.
1946년 1월 29일, 연합국총사령부 지침의 내용입니다. 일본은 혼슈, 규슈, 홋카이도, 시코쿠와 인접한 약 1000개의 섬들을
일본이 통치할 수 있다고 정하였지만, 울릉도와, 독도, 제주도는 일본 영토에서 제외한다고 명시되어 있습니다.
다섯째로 한국은 512년부터 우산국이라는 나라를 이사부가 정벌하여 합법적으로 실효지배를 하고있었습니다. 그러다가 한국은 그 곳에 살고있던 주민들의 세금을 걷기 힘들다는 이유로 독도에 빨리 나와라고 했죠. 이는 조선 조정이 시행했던 쇄한 정책입니다.
하지만 17세기 중반이 되어서야 독도를 제대로 안 일본은 이 상황도 모르면서 이 곳이 무주지라고 우기는 것이죠.
이는 삼국사기에 기록되어있는 내용이랍니다.
'세종실록지리지에도 독도가 한국 땅이다'...... 등등 훨씬 많은 근거들 입니다.
그러면 이제 일본측의 근거도 살펴봐야 할 때이지요??
1. 대한민국 영토는 대한민국 국민이라면 자유롭게 방문할 수 있어야하는데, 독도는 한국인이 접근 불가능한 섬입니다.
→한국이 독도를 천연 기념물로 지정해 놓았는데 어떻게 방문합니까??
2. 울릉군청에는 독도의 공시지가 없습니다.
→현재, 공시지가를 발표하고 있습니다.
또한, 울릉도 심흥택의 보고서에 의하면 이미 100여년 전부터 확실하게 울릉도에 속한 섬이라도 했습니다.
3. 시마네현이 독도를 일본 영토에 편입하기 이전에 일본 어민이 독도를 경영하고 있었습니다.
→사실에 맞지 않는 이야기입니다. 위에 설명드린 자료로 설명 가능합니다. 또한, 시마네현이 출처가 불분명해 국제적인 효력이 없는 건 아시고 계시죠?
4. 사람이 살지 않는 땅인 독도를 먼저 영토에 편입시켜 세상에 알린 것은 일본이므로 선점권에 의해 국제법상으로 독도는 일본의 영토입니다.
→러일 전쟁 때, 일본이 침탈하여 일본 어민들이 독도에 들어올 수 있도록 한 것은 사실이나, 일본 영토로 편입시킨다는 조항은 없었습니다. 정확히는 몇 개의 조건을 빠뜨렸습니다.)
5. 센프란시스크 조약에 의하여 독도는 일본땅입니다.
→ 미국은 여러차례 끝에 결국 독도를 한국과 일본 모두에게 독도를 편입시키지 않았기에 오히려 독도가 일본 땅이 아님을 인정하는 한국측의 증거가 될 수 있습니다. 제677호 제3항을 제대로 읽어보시지요.
6. 태정관 지령에는 독도라고 정확히 적혀있지 않습니다. 한국측이 문서를 왜곡하여 읽은 것입니다.
→누가 왜곡을 한 것입니까? 초안을 수정한 결과 최종본에서 독도의 표기가 달라진 것을 보아 이가 독도를 명시한다는 것을 인정하는 결과를 낳았습니다. (외1도)
7. 왜 한국이 ICJ에 나오지 않을까요?
→ 일본이 너무 멍청해서 한국이 국제법을 위반했다고 주장하는 것이다. 한국은 이에 가입할 때 다른나라와 달리 양측이 모두 ICJ에 찬성할 때에만 재판이 열린다. 즉, 한국으로서 구지 이런 위험을 감수할 필요없기 때문에 재판을 열지 않는 것이다. 제발 한국의 입장부터 똑바로 읽어보았으면 좋겠다.
사실 독도가 한국 땅인 이유는 이보다도 훨씬 많을 것입니다.
저는 독도가 일본 땅이라는 주장은 명백히 틀렸다는 것을 알려주고 싶었습니다.
아시다시피 일본은 한국의 영토를 많이 빼앗았고, 한국의 문화유산도 많이 없앴습니다.
대표적으로, 대마도는 원래 조선(한국)의 땅이었습니다. 저도 대마도에 대해서는 잘 모르지만, 대충 127가지의 근거가 있다고 합니다.
또한 석유 매장량이 6000조원 (사우디아라비아의 10배로 추정) 가까이 되는 7광구마저도 대륙봉을 기준으로
하였던 영토 기준이 일본에게 유리한 국제법으로 바뀌어 7광구의 90%를 일본이 차지하게 되는 어처구니 없는 상황도 벌어지고
있습니다. 뭐, 일본이 평상시에 행동하는 것 처럼, 국제법이 바뀌고 난 뒤부터 한국과 개발을 하지 않고 일본이 그 땅을
다 소유하려는 욕심 때문에, 조항을 어기면서까지 이기적인 행보를 보이고 있습니다.
(조항에 'shall'이라는 단어에 의해 위법이라고 하네요)
독도가 한국 땅임을 일본이 인정하는 날이 왔으면 좋겠습니다.
제발 한국을 그만 괴롭혀주면 좋겠습니다.
그리고 일본이 뇌물을 얼마나 먹였는지
구글이 다케시마라고 쓰고 일본해라고 표기를 하는데, 정말 일본이라는 나라가 양심이 있었으면 좋겠다라는 생각 밖에안듭니다.
또한, 일본은 중국과 러시아 등에도 땅을 우기고 있습니다. 뺏으면 좋고 실패해도 잃을게 없다는 논리인지 이해가 안가네요.
제발 착하게 사십시오.

yeah, thats my point. humans are wild

Very important strategic geography

In response, the Japanese side made this objection.
The "Takeshima" in "Takeshima and One Other Island," which was declared irrelevant to Japan in an 1877 Dajokan directive, is not the current Takeshima/Dokdo, but the fictional "Argonaut Island" that was created by a discrepancy in longitude and latitude when French and British navigators surveyed Ulleungdo, and since "One Other Island" refers to Ulleungdo, Japan has not given up the "other one island".
(I am using a machine translation so my English may be flawed)

You make no sense buddy.

@@c_kenma7307 If Japan's claim had been recognized, Takeshima would have been managed by Japan by now. However, Takeshima is currently managed by Korea. This means that Korea's claim, not Japan's claim, was recognized. If Korea has illegally occupied it, Japan or another country's claim has been acknowledged. Government agencies must have also taken action. And when we asked Japanese people if they knew where Takeshima is, most of them responded that they did not know. I think it is wrong to just claim that an island whose location is unknown is their territory.

@@c_kenma7307 “According to the foundation, dozens of ancient maps designating Dokdo as Korean were published by the Japanese government in 1894, 1903, 1929 and 1941.
Japan has insisted that Dokdo was incorporated into Japanese territory through a 1905 notice by Shimane Prefecture. But a number of official Japanese maps produced in 1908, 1925, 1938 and 1951 still show Dokdo as not belonging to Japan.
In addition, about 100 old Western maps and another 100 ancient Korean maps define Dokdo as Korean territory, the foundation noted.”

@@c_kenma7307 dude the word "Takeshima" itself came from the koreans. Takeshima means bamboo island and that is what some koreans used to call Ulleungdo, which is right next to dokdo. You know why no one called dokdo as "bamboo island"? because there's no bamboo on Dokdo. It's funny that you even say that it could be a fictional island because that name actually existed lol.

He also points Netherlands in Formosa(Taiwan),but it’s not in 19th century

I’m more of a boulder guy myself, pebbles are a maybe

40th like

Not a rock, it's island. It has nation, Korea. Just want leave Dokdo alone😭

Just like the uk

I'm a big fan of the rock

Same

apan is evil country! JAPANESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS STILL VISITS SHRINE FOR THE WW2 DEAD SOLDIERS ANNUALLY!
GERMANS DON'T GO VISIT ADOLF HITLER'S GRAVE AND PRAY FOR HIM......

Gigachad

I hope so too! Are they being claimed by like... 7 countries at the same time?

两个都曾经是中国的儿子，只不过现在爸爸换成了美国。

@@user-yw3ig1ki2j ?

This is East Sea not South China sea

@@user-yw3ig1ki2j Historically only Japan attacked China. not vice versa.

I love how this comment accurately states the history and the current ownership of Dokdo.

但都是从中国的太极和八卦上改的 还改成了凶卦😂😂😂，别不承认这是事实

@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace. G.C.D.C

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace. ㅋ라고 중국인이 주장하네

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace.China claims everything is made in China except COVID-19 🤣

​@@Stealingcultureisadisgrace.free taiwan🇹🇼 your social credit : -999999😂

@赤霞 East Asia isn't a continent though and it isn't holding them back or anything. I think East Asia will become more relevant as china rises but as other parts of the world will also grow we'll never see total hegemony like the US and Europe had in the past anymore

@赤霞 you mean subcontinent

인정

Iam Korean🇰🇷Dokdo is japan🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷🇰🇷

Why should South Korea continue to play the heroic victim, using the comfort women as a political weapon?
The world will come to understand little by little.

apan is evil country! JAPANESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS STILL VISITS SHRINE FOR THE WW2 DEAD SOLDIERS ANNUALLY!
GERMANS DON'T GO VISIT ADOLF HITLER'S GRAVE AND PRAY FOR HIM......

bros crying😢 cry about is buddy😢

Takeshima is japanese teritory

​@@user-co8sq4ui3uyes,the dakesima is japan😊
But dokdo is korea😊

​@@user-co8sq4ui3uNo, you guys have to bring passport to go Dokdo. because it's our territory.

@@user-io7fs4hw3c Takeshima is an island taken by South Korea. During the capture, dozens of Japanese were killed or injured, and many were forcibly taken away. It has been illegally occupied by South Korea ever since. Why would South Korea, which criticizes Japanese imperialism, do something like this? Many Koreans should reconsider their words and actions.

@@user-co8sq4ui3u “According to the foundation, dozens of ancient maps designating Dokdo as Korean were published by the Japanese government in 1894, 1903, 1929 and 1941.
Japan has insisted that Dokdo was incorporated into Japanese territory through a 1905 notice by Shimane Prefecture. But a number of official Japanese maps produced in 1908, 1925, 1938 and 1951 still show Dokdo as not belonging to Japan.
In addition, about 100 old Western maps and another 100 ancient Korean maps define Dokdo as Korean territory, the foundation noted.”

Glad you enjoyed them!

It has fresh water

It has also methane hydrate

actually, there is

@@Pra_seodymium if you're going to say that it's freshwater I don't want to hear it, I already know I watched the video

@@northstar1727 We don't learn much about freshwater, but instead we learn a lot about natural monuments and methane hydrates

Pretty sure the rock's also been a part of China since ancient times.

Taiwan……😂

lol

but again, China has been having disputes over land with almost every neighboring country.

lol i acttually laughed but i think its really important situations

Falklands flashback

Well, Since later Japan discovered Dokdo/Lian Court, Both Fishman fought each other.

No. All that's left is the remnants of Japan's Japanese Nazi. People who know Dokdo well don't say it's Japanese territory. Because all the stories tell us that Dokdo belongs to Korea, and in 1905, Japan deceived Korea and spread the lie that Dokdo belongs to Japan.
The San Francisco Treaty and the Scpqin stipulate that Dokdo is not a Japanese territory and guarantees all rights of Korea. The 19th-century maps of Russia and Japan clearly depict Dokdo as Korean territory. The geographical location of Dokdo is the same as that of Usando in Korea.
In 1905, Japan incorporated Dokdo into Japanese territory and did not speak to Joseon. After spreading lies all over the world, they told the manager of Ulleungdo in jeoson in 1906. The administrator reported to the king of Joseon that he had heard that the island under his jurisdiction had become Japanese territory, and Koreans protested. But Japan ignored South Korea's protest. This is because Korea's diplomatic power fell into Japan's hands when it found out about Dokdo.

If that's the case, you don't have to return the land that Germany had illegally acquired in the past

Takeshima is Japanese territory. Usando, which Korea claims to be the old name of Takeshima, is not Takeshima

@@bugyejeong5329 The Japanese point to false and fabricated evidence and insist that Dokdo belongs to Japan. I heard you even post the fabricated fact as if it were real in your textbook? So the Japanese are brainwashed like it's true... Do you really think that Korea, which was ruined by the war, was able to take away the island of Japan? Dokdo has long been an island of Koreans..All the raw data point to Korea as the owner of Dokdo. In fact, Korea's old history books have too much to prove that Dokdo is Korean territory. What evidence does Japan use to call Dokdo a Takeshima

What friendship? It's funny how friends kill each other. Pls study history or read the news. Its funny how stubborn people can get

@@smithgeorge6858 sorry, I forgot that some people don't have any friends.

@@mintysoda9005 sorry it's my bad I didn't expect you to be this uneducated.

@@mintysoda9005 LMAO

海外の皮肉面白い

Exactly, it's EASILY UNDERSTANDABLE which side is an authorized sovereign of Tskeshima/Dokdo bcuz there are a lot of FIRM EVIDENCES issued by the third party.
SKor just spreading lies and delusion upon twisted interpretation.

@@Joseph01235 If Takeshima is 100% Korean property, then of course if Japan and Korea fight in an international court, Korea would win, right? Then Korea should not refuse to go to the International Court. Because it will surely win. If Korea wins in the international court, it can say to the international community, "Takeshima belongs to Korea and Japan wrongfully claimed ownership! Japan has wrongfully claimed ownership of Takeshima! But you haven't done so because you don't have the self and evidence that it is 100% Korea's property ^^

@@Joseph01235 진짜 맞는 말. 국제사법재판소든 무엇이든 본인들 이익에 따라 움직이기에, 역사적 근거와 무관하게 돈을 자기네에게 퍼준 일본 편을 들게 되어있음. 그래서 일본 정부는 계속 지들이 정의로운 것마냥 국제사법재판소에 넘기자고 하는 것임. 또한 애초에 독도는 영토분쟁지역이 아님. 엄연히 독도는 역사적으로 한국 고유의 영토이기 때문. 따라서 국제사법재판소에 참여할 이유조차 없는 것.

mostly because there are some documents that are in favor of Japan’s rights AFTER the annexation of South Korea, so there are lots of grey areas to determine when it comes to ICJ and Koreans do not want to risk it as Korean have had a long history of sovereignty over Dokdo for hundreds of years long before the annex, which the Japanese government and the people like you are discarding outright, claiming well they are old documents and no one really knows the REAL truth, another area for which Japan can dispute about.
Now, think about why Korean would not want to take it up to ICJ? Think about Japan’s bribery in international politics. Did you know about the dark relations with Japan and IOC? Search it up or read my previous comments.

Of course, Dokdo is Korean territory, so Korea does not accept the trial.
Will the Japanese government accept if South Korea claims Fukuoka as a Korean territory and asks to go to an international trial?

No wonder brainwashed Kor ppl think so.

and how they want to believe it's right is what they are wrong.

The "Syngman Rhee Line" is not recognized by the United Nations.

@@YA-fi3ng But the san francisco treaty does.

@@TriplePistol South Korea is not a party to the San Francisco Peace Treaty. It's strange that Koreans claim that.

your comment means nothing at all. 100% of japanese now know where takeshima is. 20 years, ago I doubt any koreans knew.
???
please try to apply some logic next time.

​​@@truestrose234We knew Dokdo like since 512 😅

​@lyserinth1041 the young generations are getting brainwashed and it should be illegal. Feels bad for the young kids in Japan

​@@truestrose234Check your own logic first before making criticism regarding other ppl's logic. You doubt any Koreans knew about dokdo 20 years ago? As a native Korean, your opinion is a complete false. My grandparents are now in their 70's, and they are clearly aware of the location + info regarding dokdo.

･Japan's Cabinet decided in 1905 to incorporate Takeshima into Shimane Prefecture.
･Even in the San Francisco Peace Treaty, which demarcated Japan's territory after the war, Takeshima was not included in the area Japan should abandon.
Let the ICJ resolve this issue.

And then we recognize Dokdo as a disputed territory, and I don't think that's necessary because Koreans are already living there

It is the result that Japan wants. Most of the countries with territorial disputes with Japan are getting longer in this way. This is because they can try to take over the territory with their diplomatic power only when it becomes a disputed area. According to various data, Liancourt Reef has historically been Korea's territory, but it does not appear that Japan occupied it and recognized the value of Liancourt Reef as the war ended and released it. Personally, it seems that Korea's territory is right

I agree. We have to prove that Dokdo Island is clearly Korean land. Ha ha.

@@sjh439 koreens have no right stealing more land

At the scapin677, which is a map of NorthEast asia right after Japan's surrender,
>"It recognizes Dokdo/Lian Court as a Korean territory,"<
Right before the Korean war, There was a line that splits communism and capitalist side, which accused the entire Korean peninsula being communism side
>"Alongside Dokdo/Lian Court being communism side as well which means Dokdo/Lian Court has no relations with Japan,"<
At the draft San Francisco treaty article 3,
The Allied and Associated Powers agree that there shall be transferred in full sovereignty to the Republic of Korea all rights and titles to the Korean Mainland territory and all offshore Korean islands, including Quelpart(Saishu To), the Nan how group (San To, or Komun Do) which forms Port Hamilton(Tonaikai), Dagelet Island(Utsuryo To, or Matsu Shima),
>"Liancourt Rocks(Takeshima),"<
and all other islands and islets to which Japan had acquired title lying outside
I hope this answered your question.

@@TriplePistol Ur excuses for illegal occupation on JPN's island is filled with lies.

​@@jeanmiyu6904 What is lie is what you obsess in what you want to believe mindlessly.

Start by doing it with the Diaowidao Islands

Regarding the Senkaku Islands, there is no request from China to entrust ICJ, so there is no need to go all the way😂
Of course, you should go if there is a request👍🏻‪‪

Lmao

당신 역사적 증거도 보지 않고 말하는거지?

@@user-handsomeflower Just bring it to ICJ.
I know a thief won't go to Court.

@@yantom701 If Korea suddenly claims ownership of Tsushima and bring it to ICJ, will Japan agree? International trials are conducted when a territorial dispute 'exists'.

@@user-gz8ov2xb7j It's a typical childish hypothesis. JPN would have accepted the court battle at ICJ if Kor's territorial claim was issued when Tsushima island became a part of territory of JPN. Meanwhile JPN has been issuing the claim since SKor stole our island in 1954.
You are just found out that you were pretending to know everything related to territorial claim. lol

@@user-gz8ov2xb7j Japan accepted ICJ Article 36-2
Study more about the ICJ system.
So you won't ask this stupid question.
Dokdo is under illegal occupation by Korean forces. Totally different circumstance.
You should feel shame for saying this school kid's theory for a diplomatic issue. anyway, don't scare to go to ICJ and Justice.

How much sloppy research is needed to come to that conclusion?
If you read the San Francisco Treaty, it is clear that under international law, Takeshima is globally recognized as Japan's territory.

So, why not argue your research findings at the International Court of Justice?

@@user-tl4tj4zx2uread the "San Franciso Treaty"? you think US, third country represents the historical truth? never searched the documents surrounding dokdo? and you are believing its japanese. do you even know how ridiculous you are saying? learn history

@@syoh9673 First of all, there are several points at issue, but regarding the San Francisco Peace Treaty, first of all, it was Japanese territory, including pre-war Korea. Even if the land invaded during World War II was illegal, in the case of Korea, it was legally annexed, and this was recognized by the great powers of the time. Therefore, Korea can only claim land that Japan has renounced its territorial rights to. This was determined by the San Francisco Peace Treaty, so the San Francisco Peace Treaty cannot be ignored. Also, this gives the feeling that the decision was made unilaterally on the South Korean side, so if South Korea were invaded and Takeshima was previously South Korean territory, it is understandable that South Korea would claim sovereignty over Takeshima. However, this is actually not the case. South Korea says that Usando is Takeshima, but Usando is drawn to the west of Ulleungdo, so the location is reversed. It is also stated that the island is covered in trees, but since Takeshima is an island made up of rocky mountains, the claim that Usando is Takeshima cannot be accepted.

From ancient Japanese literature it is a sea lion

“Measured by the standards of modern civilization, Japan would be like a boy of twelve as compared with the [Anglo-Saxon] development of 45 years" - General MacArthur

@@protestantwarrior1516 That guy was illiterate then. The Anglo Saxons arrived in Britain around the 500s while Japanese were already forming Kingdoms by at least the 200-200 AD time period. The Japanese monarchy is older than any other monarchy in the world

@@nayeemhaider8367 Japanese monarchy is just a Korean Baekje substrate, nothing more. Japan did not have a bronze age, so they relied on bronze and iron from Korea during Yayoi Korean invasion. Japanese did not have any civilizaiton before 500s. Nihon Shoki is not a reliable source.

@@nayeemhaider8367 Japan only has the oldest 2,600 old imperial family according to their mythical accounts. It is total bullshit because they have no proof of the emperors they claim existed before the 6th century AD. The Chinese wrote Records of the Three Kingdoms, guess what, the names of the Japanese chiefs or kings in the Records of the three kingdoms do not match up with the names of fake Japanese emperors claimed to have existed in that era by the 8th century Nihon Shoki and Kojiki which were the first books written in Japan. The Japanese did not use the title of Emperor (tenno) before the 6th century AD, they only used the title of King to refer to their fake kings since their first fake Emperor Jimmu but after borrowing the title of Emperor from China, they retroactively applied Emperor to all of their fake kings since Emperor Jimmy. The title Tenno (Tianddi) was derived from Daoist influence in Tang dynasty China.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Records_of_the_Three_Kingdoms#Legacy
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihon_Shoki
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kojiki
Japan had no literacy or writing before the 5th centuy AD. The only written objects they had were Chinese seals given to them by the Han Emperor like the seal where the Han Emperor of China called the Japanese tribal chief a King of the midget (dwarf) slaves. This is not trolling that's what it says. The Japanese chief accepted this seal as a sign he was a vassal of Han China.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Na_gold_seal
漢委奴國王
Japan still officially promotes the lie that Jimmu is descended from the Sun goddess Amaterasu and reigned since 660 BC. There's an official holiday for it.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Foundation_Day
www.nationalgeographic.com/culture/topics/reference/japanese-monarchy/

@@schneejacques3502 Great post! Let the truth be truly known. Time to bring some parity into all this Nippon romanticizing and worshipping.

It is the Japanese name of the island that South Korea illegally occupies.

@see way A dictator called "Syngman Rhee" illegally invaded Takeshima.
"Syngman Rhee" remains in history as the first president of South Korea to mass slaughter Koreans.

@see way Koreans who believe in the delusions of Syngman Rhee, pathetic.

@@YA-fi3ng yo mama be illegal

There is no evidence

Dokdo

@@user-wj1kb5fj8v is korea refusing for the issue to be brought to international court 3 times not enough evidence?

@@user-wj1kb5fj8v there is a lot

If there is evidence, the International Court of Justice should decide the issue. But if South Korea refuses to go to court, it is because the facts are against the South Korean side.
As soon as possible, South Korea must admit its illegal occupation and apologize to the Japanese government, including the Japanese fishermen who were killed.

Not insist. Takeshima has been belonging to Japan, and Koare invaded and illegally occupying there. That is just a fact.

You show why Japan need not take Korea's protest about history seriously. For Korea, words like history or war crime are just a tool to justify Korea's territorial ambition.

​@LOVELYMEN0207 Do you know how much money the japanese goverment uses in lobbying international facilities😂😂 of course you wouldnt 'cause you're always told lies about your country😂😂 why the hell would korea and russia go into court for their islands when it is obvious that the decision of the court would be decided by money😂😂😂😂

?

Then it becomes a conflict zone and harms us

@@user-oq3fe7oh4c You have two choices, one is to goad your gov to return JPN's Takeshima, the other is to goad your gov at least to stand at ICJ for court battle.

@@jeanmiyu6904 It seems like you have only one choice. Struggling not to lose what you desire blindly

@@TriplePistol The thing you must do is to see primary documents, not distorted history fillied with lies and delusions, crested by your corrupt SKor gov.

@@user-oq3fe7oh4c Korean must have the concept of the word JUSTICE.

Well the Falklands at least has population, and it also has territorial waters. These rocks are far more irrelevant in material terms

@@FOLIPE wow ok, just going to say that are you. As a rock I feel offended so take your opinions and shove em 🖕

Yes Korea = UK

no

@@user-lf8jl8rg8e ?

Yes

뭐라는거야

@@user-wu5wx1fi5m 뭘 뭐라는거라니 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 다팩트고 우리쉴드쳐주고 있는데

You seem to have a slight misunderstanding, so I'd like to point it out.
The 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty was a World War II peace treaty concluded between Japan and 48 Allied nations. A peace treaty is a treaty concluded between belligerent countries declaring the end of war and the restoration of peace. The conditions for peace include the cession of territory, compensation, and the release of prisoners of war.
It is natural that the South Korean government could not attend San Francisco, since South Korea was not a belligerent in World War II. South Korea is a country that was founded on August 15, 1948, and is classified as a "third country."
Japan continues to insist that it did not abandon Takeshima under the San Francisco Peace Treaty. If there is an objection to the Japanese government's claim, only the 48 countries that are signatories to the treaty can file an objection, and the Republic of Korea does not have that right.
The territory of the Republic of Korea was granted by Japan and the 48 Allied Powers. The Republic of Korea's armed occupation of Japan's Takeshima is an act that goes against the international order.

Hello, I am a middle school student living in Korea. First of all, thank you for proving that Dokdo is our land. Internationally, the most important factor in recognizing the territorial sovereignty of a disputed area is not “which country it was on in the past,” but “which country is in effective control (effective display, effectivités) at the time of arbitration.” Based on the standards before and after World War II. As Dokdo is under the effective control of the Republic of Korea, as of now, Dokdo’s sovereignty lies with the Republic of Korea! thank you again

@@Either2923 My dear Korean friend, neither me or the person that commented claim to know the truth, because truth is a matter of perception, but we have rules and regulation and international laws to abide by, and according to international law, The islands are Japanese, both me and the person commenting is stating this, so you have misunderstood our point. The islands are lawfully Japanese, but this does not change the fact that it was unfair and should be changed. I believe that Japan should give the island back to South Korea as a friendly gesture, and I believe that Japan would have done this already if it was not because South Korea had used this as an act of opposition after the war, Korea illegally occupied the island after the war.