I spent a day with the CEO of YOUTUBE

this is such a cool idea! good idea anthony your content is amazing and i can definitely tell how your content has upgraded in the years.

Never saw this coming...

bro love ya

Hello

E

Not really he’s a sole trader

He’s essentially interviewing the person behind the random number generator controlling the entire website.

@@ryedog exactly cos KRplusrs are not employees. They are sole traders. They are their own boss. When they upload that makes them contract workers.

Just because she has the power to prevent him from doing his job doesn't mean that she's his boss lol, he's his own boss unless someone else owns his KRplus channel and pays him salary.

@@mayena5844 They are as much sole traders as I'm not a citizen of the United States. They have to abide by rules, they have to play the algorithm games, and in the end YT has total control over their future in their company

@Jody's Spicy Takes sadly they would still be fine.

I think the one nervous there was Susan.

KRplus is gonna get destroyed with backlash Similar to removing dislikes

Wrong mindset

@Jody's Spicy Takes That's what you would think right? Yes people would be mad but considered to the gigantic mass of people on youtube, I can't truly imagine him making a huge affect.

Exactly

That was exactly my thought as well. I really wish KRplus would overhaul the reward for having subscribers. But then again, balancing that with keep discoverability would be a challenging task.

The algorithm gave it to me 5 months later

@@trashfay same

@@trashfay lucky, i had to search for this🤦🏾‍♀️

This made me laugh my blood out

@@Ben-playz 😮

@@Ben-playz I don't think that's healthy, try and make some of that tic tok food that will probably kill you in a few days

​@@Ben-playz i got buckets

Fr tho

It's like, I understand that we all *know* children are going to be on here regardless, BUT at the end of the day that comes down to parents, parental controls, and how much they let their children access, and how much they monitor it. Honestly, the more invested you seem in your child's interest in content & creators, the better idea you'll have of WHAT they're really watching. Parents who don't make an effort to keep up with these things who then criticize creators for their choice in content, as well as the platform for "allowing" their children to watch something are just ignorant.

the problem is youtube kids fucking sucks. im not surprised at how kids usually don't use it.

@@thefunniestenbyalive2054 it's a platform for literal kids, of course it's going to suck after you're like 10. But that's your parents fault for not being able to parent the way they're supposed to, not the rest of the adult population who watches KRplus

because they just care about advertisers who want their products available to as many people as possible, especially the most impressionable (kids)

Heo yea.

Well obviously, he says, “my name is Anthony Padilla”

Same

@SAGE Central the force is strong within you

same lololol

Who is it??

@@TSG-Pink the guy who reportedly started the push to remove the dislike button, who came from advertising, among other red flags

@@bradhaines3142 So youtube's in even worse hands?

@@fdoofrrr much, suprisingly

The algorithm is

did you actually watched the video ? she literally explained everything about the question she was asked or do u find ridding on the hating bandwagon fun

Well she mostly answered the questions safely and didnt actually fully answer the tougher questions

@@calebtitler1847 pretty understandable tbh. Anyone in a position like that has to be very careful with what they say and how they phrase it or they risk losing their career or potentially billions of dollars for their company, regardless of who they are. This is a very common occurrence and is present in the vast majority of statements by public figures and people in position of power. The difference is that people are looking for answers directly from her and are disappointed by the reality of her position as a result.

@@iota3243 If someone in her position literally cannot answer the questions presented then either 1. the questions were bad or 2. there was no point in interviewing in the first place. I think Anthony would have been better off being more specific with the questions. Don't ask questions in generality. Relate the issue to 1-5 specific people. That way she can at least say she can look into the issues and more direct answers can be given on those cases and potentially help the creator/s.

"Dodged every question" feels like a bit of a reach. She is the CEO so it's a given that she would be very cautious when answering certain questions but I think she did pretty good at responding to each question as best she could.

Yessss

Yes the last one is an especially pressing issue haha

bro those ceiling fixers are making bank

My mom has MS so I think this would be really impactful.

Yess! Especially the first one, as my sister has MS, it would be very helpful

it would take HOURS to do and im sure she doesnt have the time for that. but perhaps, we can get into that (or what she can share legally and with her NDAs) in the follow up interview. Im excited by the fact that there _is_ a follow up and that she agreed to it. It really shows that she cares. theres only so much one person can do. Shes not 100% perfect, no one is, but shes trying. I cant imagine trying to appease creators, viewers, advertisers, investors, the youtube staff, etc. If human history has shown anything, no two groups can agree on everything. There are MANY groups involved that want different things. it really is complicated. and trying ot get the context for everything is a full time job on its own. like you heard that she tries to keep up with the drama and other stuff that is upsetting creators, but 500+ hours are uploaded every minute. she cant keep up with _everything_. She needs help and hopefully she can get it from her VPs and staff

the complication is that advertising companies, the government, viewers, parents, content creators, and more are all shoving them into a tiny little corner. The government doesn’t want them to target children, and pushes them away from said content (but it’s more complicated then that bc they also want the content to be child friendly, yet not for kids? idk, i only sorta understand the laws). Advertisers want brand friendly-which means more targeted for children, or at least censored- content. Then there are the creators who want to be able to make the content they wanna make (and get paid for it), without having to always avoid swearing or mentioning any hot button issues. Viewers want everything to remain as unchanged as possible, with no ads, no restrictions, no nothing. They have to give in to some points, they can’t make everyone happy. Often, the people they chose to sacrifice are the viewers and content creators: the advertisers control all the money, and the government could pass very restrictive laws on google as a whole, or even use trust busting to call it a monopoly and break it up.

@@morgand3675 I dont have much to add except to the last sentence you said. You are right, usualy the viewers and creators are the ones left out. But youtube and the advertisers know that there is no youtube without those two groups. In one way, those two groups are the most powerful
If everyone decided to stop using youtube (lets say vimeo goes mainstream lol), the company would crash. youtube makes no money, advertisers dont get their ads. So in a way its in everyone's best interest to keep those two groups in mind

@@morgand3675 The biggest point you said is that the advertisers control all the money. That's why viewers and creators have less priority. Unfortunately, the only solution to that is if most people start paying for Premium. That would actually put the 'You' back into KRplus because it would kick advertisers out, KRplus's bills would be paid by the viewers, and creators will all make double the money totally unrestricted by ad guidelines. Problem there is that viewers mostly don't see it worth signing up for Premium.
Note on the kid-friendly stuff, the law is we can't target kids specifically, but we can still be kid-friendly. For example, a video about laptop reviews is kid-friendly but not 'for kids' specifically. Advertiser-safe doesn't mean targeting kids, but it does mean kid-safe.

It's complex because it involves creators, audience and advertisers. When your company is so big there is a lot more red tape, there are a lot more voices there are a lot more bigger picture things. At the end of the day figure out what part you want to learn about and someone can break it down because every part of their business operations is layers and layers that need to be broken down. Also there are so many automated systems in place which are not perfect but I see creators getting all up in arms at 'KRplus' but most of the flagging etc is all automated. And finally just the sheer volume and variety of content being uploaded makes the management of such data at a level that most individuals cannot comprehend.

boosting this comment about the same energy and i to be more like it is so funny that i and i agree that you will have a different story and you know what you are talking to east and i

Yes! Thank you for the video rec too, I have wanted to start a children's activities channel with my daughter as I work in childcare too, but I'm terrified about her safety. We already don't share her name/our surname/my husband's name on instagram, and we don't show her face, but it's still terrifying.

This

Boosting this comment because I agree.

Andrea Terbei also did a neat video on family vloggers. He focused more on the abuse and disregard of the child's wishes that often happens on those channels. All of his videos are so interesting.

this youtuber he's kinda small on here but he got his channel taken down when he was at a lowish 200k subs(around 300k now) and it took his fan base going crazy on twitter tagging them(YT) in everything to even be able to get in touch with anyone at youtube :/ there should be a way where people can get in touch with someone at youtube i know certain youtbers like markiplier have a manger over there but people who don't have 10m and up in subs

Yes, give the creator a chance to remove the video, before threatening the creator's entire livelihood and years of hard work. This is causing mental stress, anxiety and depression for creators.

Problem with that is once it is out there it is out there. Someone makes it once and then takes it down could do it again. So they make another and then take it down etc etc ad infinitum. They can then just keep putting up banned content as long as they take it down.

@@jmdio740 I see what you're saying, but I think they're referring to content in the past that was approved at the time, but as the guidelines change, some content them becomes unapproved by the guidelines.

Strikes should also go away once the content they came from has been removed. That whole system needs to be friendlier to creators.

If by people you mean ideologues who live in their own bubble above everyone else.

@@victorsarkisov4480 easy to say as someone who is not them

Thats not the counter you think it is. You just admitted they dont have him in their circle, thus his statement that they are in their own world is true

*Go read the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.*

Yeah, I like him, but I felt that too.
Was very disappointing.
Infact it kind of put my opinion down about him.
I've never seen him laugh quite as long & hard, over nothing, then in this video infact.
😏

@@mayflower2158 it’s actually pretty smart there’s an old saying “the smartest way to defeat your enemy, is to make them your friend.”

@@mayflower2158 Can't hate a man who's defending his livelihood. Don't hate the player hate the game.

@@earlaweese what

@Logan Roof I do

i call her wojiki

It’s funny when you’re Polish and you hear everyone struggling with it and for you it’s easy and obvious

padildo lol

@@olivia9863 and also the fact that that is the male version of her surname lol

Acheeto!

he already did the interview, you see

Ask her? LOL, ask the political machine that she's a puppet for. Section 230 needs to be repealed so they either let us be free or be accountable for what we post. You can't have your cake and eat it too.... Well, I guess we can't have our cake. Google ate it all.

OMG HEY ACHEETO I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS

acheeto

Ikr. I wish Anthony went a little harder on her and actually asked some hard questions... This interview felt very pointless.

Yeah I realized that too

I think she means that they don't want adult content come in the recommend in case kids stumble across it

@@donteattidepods KRplus isn’t meant for kids

@@totallynotsatan976 But kids are on youtube and everyone knows it

I heard if you’re first to reply on a verified persons comment, u get likes

what's up checkmark

I'm most curious about the Suzy Lu connection with youtube from the CEO

inb4 Keemstar

Oh, wouldn't you like to know XD

Any agreers?

Agreed

Agreed

Agreed

But that's not what advertisers think. No matter what, they don't want their branding near content they don't agree with.

And, “i spent a day with satan”, and the first question would be, “how does it feel to be so hated by some many people?”.

@@lizzietaylorsversion5941 sadly in this world more people hate Jesus Christ than they hate the devil

@@annonomus1439 really? I thought people hated the devil more, I’m not Christian but i don’t hate him at all-

@@lizzietaylorsversion5941 People don't hate Jesus, just his followers

@@neilbakrania458 True Christians Love Jesus Christ but just about everyone else loves themselves and there desires more and in alot cases love the satan more than they Love the Lord

She did answer it. Again. It’s all about money. Policy doesn’t matter. MV’s like WAP are popular. Extremely popular and therefore are money makers. Advertisers will throw money at youtube to have there ads on it. Policy only matters when a loss is being made. That is, when an advertiser pulls from youtube due to their ads playing on something they don’t wish for their brand to represent.
And the algorithm helps to sort out which videos are advertiser friendly.
It’s just money. It’s that simple.
Wanna know the truth? Follow the money.
This is for everything too, not just YT.

She said the term ADPOCALYSE

The answer: advertisers.
They are evil and only care about money. They want to stay on those extremely sexual music videos. If KRplus decided to crack down on the music videos and drop the hammer, advertisers would throw a fit and might leave. That would be worse than having small channel getting their videos demonitized or something because advertisers leaving would be bad for EVERYONE.
So smaller content creators have to deal with the unfair preferential treatment the industry gets because the advertisers are the ones really in power

Yess, thank you, personally I want to know why KRplus will show mobile app games that allude to undressing people are harems and all that sexual stuff and then ban a KRplusr for tanking about trans rights. Also, they put those adds on videos like wholesome tik tok compilations and history videos.It’s infuriating

It really wasn’t explained properly, she completely avoided the question. I know she was like it’s the money but I felt like it was a nice escape goat if you know wat I mean. Cause you type in porn and you get behind the scenes on training and stuff that’s not demonized. It’s the hypocrisy of if you put the word sex in the title or your say fuck your video is taken down but a video labeled how to have the best anal sex wasn’t taken down. Like if your gonna leave that up that leave the rest up and vise versa.

Yeah. Anthony is a vegan himself btw.

@@memeeater420 really? I never knew that

@@dotorange7621 because he's not an insufferable pedant about it, unlike our favorite tik tok teacher.

@@themudpit621 absolutely. Anthony is the perfect example of what a good vegan is. A guy that cares about animals but isn't forcing or bragging about their diets to meat eaters cuz he knows damn well that it'll only throw them off and make them hate vegans for this. Even my brother is vegan and he hates these types of vegans.

@@memeeater420 KRplus has literal P0rn-Channel AND a Reportbutton...
people like to whine about KRpluss state,
but not wanna act.
I call that b.s. out.
And you?

O THOUGH THAT TOO LOLL

Lol

LOOOL

Well, this comment gonna blow up

same dude, i was editing some stuff and saw this, gotta check it out

dude why are you in literally everyone's comments section, i stg i see you everywhere
Justin Y V2

LOL

I am your 300 liker

There on a call because of corona /COVID-19so her mic isn’t the best

@@sayuki3054 it's a joke (and even if it wasn't, that increase in remote conference is all the more reason to upgrade your mic)

@@mamaharumi oh i didn’t really get the joke then I thought he/she/they/them had a legit question

This is funny :)

She still could've used a mic like Blue Yeti or something, I'm pretty sure this call is through her PC

I think your forgetting he’s Anthony. He never cops out

Yeah

@@Tek not usually a fan of MatPat but he did ask some hard hitting questions and due to Susan only alloting a little time he had to accept some of her rather crappy answers but he made it clear that he didn't believe it. Regardless he asked a lot of questions and argued with some of the ones she gave. Sometimes it even got kinda heated to the point where you could tell Susan couldnt come up with much to refute.
I think the worst interview I saw was from one of the Try Guys..Eugene Lee Yang I believe. His questions were rather weak and I just got the vibes that he was kinda sucking up to Susan tbh.

@@Tek Not really, MatPat literally asked straight up why gaming was being separated and segregated from the rest of KRplus content.

@@KRplusSupportSucks I love Anthony's content I really do but I think sometimes he tends to go easy on people. Like recently I felt very weird about his Dream interview because he was defending Dream as someone who isn't self centered when I don't think that's the issue with Dream. That and him saying that he's talked to him and he's chill when to be honest, just because we may know a creator doesn't mean we know how they conduct themselves online and how kinda rude they can be. I think thats becoming more than clear with every youtuber controversy that we can never truly know a person online.

she is also basically his boss though

Gotta act nice around the boss.

@@thekingt6860 Well yes and no. She is the CEO but she’s only a small part of a team of people and he doesn’t answer directly to her. It is still in his best interest to be polite but I still think it’s great that he was regardless of my opinions on her

Why do people hate her so much

@@sjrhisnf Apparently she doesn't allow creators to be creative.

Yt is a mess rn. She is handling it so badly. Idk if any of you have noticed it but A LOT of replies on comments are disappearing. Its a bug that yt acknowledges but no one tries to fix it. You can try it by commenting on this thread then refreshing to see whether your comment sticks. If it doesnt go to yt twitter @teamyoutube and report it. The way theyre mishandling this platform is outrageous

@@nanasmolina8565 Yk Susan play favorites right? If he gets on her nerves she can mess up his channel.

True...

Even if she does he got actual fans that can ask for him.

That may be a bit too evil but she could delete this video if she wants so yeah the stress is pretty big

There are so many groomers allowed on this site it's disgusting

@@MellowJelly and they chose to ban leafy.. and the cake trilogy

Or even describe in great detail why you won't ban him. Don't just give a vague legal sounding answer. In the very least the copyright abuse is a solid reason for consequences.

And Logan Paul is still here after a literal--well, we all know. KRplus has golden boys and girls and obvious favoritism.

@@badgeoshame389 shoulve been banned in 2017-18 but its been years already
if its any of the paul bros getting banned its jake

Why so they can PR 🙄

Yassss

ice poseidon

CallMeCarson

No. Don't platform problematic people on a channel that has been used as a safe space of sorts.

I think it is difficult for him to insist on it since he uploads on the plateform, he may have had some "bondaries" like « ok, you can ask this question but take my answer and don’t insist » (it’s only suppositions but I mean, it seems logical)
At least, she admits they have double-standards

They dont have much to do abt it unless you wanna risk the whole platforms income. They cant say im not putting your ad unless you also have the same stantard for this vid, bc advertisers dont care they have full power over the platform theyre the reason yt stays running theyre the income source and they can pull their ads anytime without hesitation, cuz they have other options theyre not dependent on yt, yt is dependent on them. Hosnstly yt is doing their best, remember theyve been through this w the adpocalypse before and they bounced back and managed to keep the creators and the viewers on the platform, and they understandably dont wanna risk it again. Remember that money is the primary reason this site exists, creators wouldnt stay if the income isnt enough its their job, and the money comes from advertisers, yt has to please the advertisers first and foremost to keep the site alive. They do a good job, this is not an easy thing to maintain.

@@theyfukenwmesubliminally Exactly. If anyone else is still a bit confused, I would highly recommend watching a few videos on economics. It'll be helpful to both understand these sorts of topics that companies face, and also to just better understand the way money works in the world.

I feel like it’s because there things she cannot disclose due to legal reasons, anything she says as CEO can have an effect on the whole company, there’s probably NDA’s included in these.

The point is that advertisers choose, and they don’t care what type of content a famous singer puts out, while they don’t want to risk it in small channels that they don’t know and don’t give a fuck about.

If he interviews are current POTUS, someone will have to keep reminding him that he is doing an interview with Anthony Padilla...buttt it would still be very cool.

@@GingerThereforeNoSoul
“So Mr. President how do you plan to keep young people involved in elections?”
“Have some chocolate chocolate chip”

Anthony- "So how do you like being president?"
Biden- "Well being the president is...Uh....Well..."(Blank stare for 1 min.) I swear the guy just shuts down. He has like the beginning signs of Alzheimer's or Dementia it's a little frightening that he's leading our country. I've seen way too many videos where he just like blanks out. Really weird. Maybe he's just stalling waiting for someone behind the scenes to give him an answer to questions he's afraid to reveal too much information about or something like that.

@@shabadoey I mean, I'd love some chocolate chocolate chip for voting instead of the stupid sticker....lol.

@@RobReith there is a tiktok of him talking about roaches (no idea why) and then some how within the same breath he talks about being at the pool and kids watching the water run down his legs and how it would make the hair on his legs move down...and I was just watching like..."is he high!!??"

Because KRplus has 1 trillion videos uploaded on it every minute. You can’t monitor every video uploaded so they create bots. Bots aren’t perfect and sometimes cause issues. It’s a complicated mess

It's a multi-million dollar corporation/company or whatever, I'm sure the investors and people who have interests in the company wouldn't appreciate the CEO blabbing about the inner workings of the company on the website itself let alone anywhere else.

Multi-Billion*

because youtube loves vague rules and views

....
....
..it's complicated.

Very true, used to have drinking/smoking(marijuana) and lots of other content that it is good that it’s removed/regulated (animal abuse, things that promote self harm/eating disorders, etc). Edit: I should say excessive drinking on camera, not the carefully edited Truth or Drink type deals where maybe 3 shots get taken total the whole video.

I hear that too, but some creators make insane amount of money nowdays.

if you mean less or no demotization, then yeah.

I’ve heard they use to get paid more $ directly from Google but less on sponsorships and now it’s the opposite.

Nightmare files!! Oml i love ur channel

*WHY is the CEO of KRplus?*

@@wapaloosie9512 *When is the CEO of KRplus?*

The fact that Anthony actually asked those questions in the vid is awesome

@@wapaloosie9512 overated

Serial Killers: Where is the CEO of KRplus?

this just reminds me of that one vine

she responds: _why not?_

😂 😂 😂

Wow u have nearly 2mil subs but no verify check?
That also seems like a usless yt feature...

I watched you when I was a kid.

ayyy I remember watching you back in 2013-2014

@@Kelleck lmao sure you did 😂

@@dakweenlyrics409 I did wdym. I watched him blend a thomas the tank engine train.

Such a stupid excuse... She has the power to make major changes to the company but doesn't even educate herself on the main huge issues on this platform?

@@MellowJelly at the end of the day, it's a business. Susan will rightfully do what makes the most money. Welcome to business.

@@MellowJelly
Right, but she also has people in charge for shit like that whom she trusts (rightfully or not) and if they aren't saying anything, she's within her rights and boundaries to think that that division is doing fine. Sure she has almost complete authority in the entire project but you have to remember that it's not always that simple. It should be and your feelings are completely valid but until it's become simple, all we can do is hope they listen.

It’s a whole team effort too she’s not in charge of everything, there’s also advertisers to please not just the content creators.

@@MellowJelly Then make your own website since it is clearly so easy!

Omg hi Steve

Found u

Ayyyyyy

Lol, I love this man

Omg hi Steven 😄

Yes

Yes although she didn’t answer most of the questions posed to her anyway. She skirted around them a lot

It would be even better if it was a live stream

@@lilladybug137 Yes. With the way she dances verbally, she would fit right in with most politicians.

ᶜᵃⁿ ⁱ ᵍᵉᵗ ¹ ˢᵘᵇ ᵇᵉᶠᵒʳᵉ ᵗᵒᵐᵒʳʳᵒʷ?😢

I agree

yea

yoo i saw you on a actually stephen stream

Wdym better suited? Just curious no hate :)

I feel like all the criticism has gotten under her skin in a bad way. Like, I think it's hard for her to make it constructive anymore.

It was embarrassing really, for her to go after him like that and nitpicking on every word he had said. Felt like she had gotten really offended by that even if his coments are always very netrual and analytic. It was a very unprofessional reaction from her side.

Anthony is too popular so he would still be famous on other platforms if he got removed from KRplus

@@ILikeBirds true but youtube pretty much has a monopoly in terms of internet videos. No other platform compares

I was equally bummed. I'm sure we all heard "had to remove sound because of copyright strikes." plus the fact that a few can get your channel taken down is rather big

the main problem is still being the music industry, some of them are just a blakc hole of money lol. the blame cant really shifted completly to youtubes side since its mostly the music industry decision and their content id that is causing the problem but i do agree that youtube should be a better middleman to negotiate the problems()

No bc i love???

@@berryandryan ?

At that point thats not even KRplus, its the greedy music industry (music producer here). Just to compare it, if i use a rythm similar(like very close) to, for exemple, ubrella by Rihanna, i could literally get sued. The music industry in general is just so greedy and take every chance to make a little more money. Its crazy

I am surprised those channels are getting demonitized. For it shows something a little bit creepy/eerie, or it shows a little bit of blood and whatnot? Man, the news already shows that many times, and movies and TV series do it in plenty and liters of blood. All without any warning of triggers for the following (insert whatever). There are a lot of warnings before the video actually starts, so why would those channels be targeted for demonitzation when people who are squeamish about blood and such can click off when the chance is still there? Sheesh. I seriously do not get the fact how KRplus is still standing so high and mighty with all these false reasons to ruin someone's paycheck and motivation?

xD

don't forget the thunder and lightning in the background

500th like

@@CushtyCosmos there is only 247 likes..

@@dabohdsta no it has 603 now..... Open your eyes buddy

@@KRplusSupportSucks she's recovering from anorexia how is that self harm?

@@mrwoman4843 st*rving urself is sh i think, i dont know too much about anorexia tho

Exactly what I'm thinking

@@mrwoman4843 she's gotten worse. Like severely.
She needs to leave and come back when she's better. its both healthier for young views and her.

@@frankie_airo shes actually not recovering at all anymore, in fact she might not have been recovering to begin with. plus i got groomed in her discord server.

Partnering with KRplus as a content creator is like dating an alcoholic sociopath who has a hobby in gaslighting you.

Hallo Simon, lustig dich unter diesem Video zu sehen

“Edgy content” and “community standards” are loose terms and don’t apply to al content creators equally. KRplus guidelines are an intentional crock of BS.

yeah, it happened to me channel gone :(

@@1970joedub one need the work i take it and throw some unmedicated bipolar on top

When he was asked her abt the lude stuff on music vids
She said "They r well established, very popular videos"
I don't,need to say anything

Well obviously she can't or is unwilling to do so as that would set expectations to content creators that she's aware and will do something to fix it or she won't because she doesn't care because it makes her bank.

Advertisers white list those, so they have more leniency. It's about the money.

The questions were standard and with a few of them he even answered for her. I love Anthony but I'm not fanboy enough to ignore then fact he could've pushed harder.

@@Jizzlewobbwtfcus The questions were screened by her team beforehand

Yep, total cop-out, deflecting the blame. Can't say I'm surprised.

the question was about monetization of lewd music videos vs general content, not takedowns

@@llynxfyremusic then you should ask why wasn't the question about takedowns.

@@tornnpoys9697 Well because it wasnt

@@tornnpoys9697 but i know she's listening
And i know it's much more complex then that

They don't care about filth. If it advances cultural Marxism it's full steam potato ahead with that. But someone making you actually think or question something or advance of American exceptionalism? Oh hell no, that sh# has got to go!

FACTS!

@@loturzelrestaurant also I’m not looking at gender radio- I don’t feel like using my energy to look into it rn- I will later just not now sorry

@@retana0612 Later is good.
Later is fine.
And the Male-Female-Ratio is anyway just something to look out for; its not the 'only' Issue there... as i said: Absolutely reportworthy,
especially if you consider innocent KRplusrs DID got deleted!!

@@loturzelrestaurant wait- did disoshdid (I forgot how to spell their name-) get deleted? I don’t keep up with them anymore- also how Tiktok is also super bad about pushing down LGBTQA+ stuff

KRplus is quickly getting worse in so many ways. One example is that they continue to become stricter on demonetization and sometimes even ban a creator for no apparent reason. KRplusr’s customer service is non existent; there is no way for a creator to contact youtube except through Twitter.

LMAO

On their own platform

Facts

True

@@DyslexicMitochondria it happens! youtube is horrible with bots. i had one person comment on my channel Im from india when i asked where people were from and it got hidden

KRplus wants to pretend they have neither an employer/employee relationship, not a contract with its creators.
...That is unless it being a contract works in the favour of their argument in the moment.

When you have 300 likes and 2 comments lol

Yes, advertisers are two faced. On one end, they advertise on the most disgusting and vile music videos that go way beyond YT's Terms and conditions, but on the other end, nitpick a verbal slip or channels that focus on things that YT doesnt like, but dont come close to breaking the terms. Its clearly discriminatory.
How about demographic advertising? Understand that there are advertisers that WANT to advertise on certain content that YT may not like. For instance, preppers. There is an entire market for prepping supplies, yet this group on YT is under heavy scrutiny, demonetized and deplatformed regularly. If you dont allow all groups, within reason, to express themselves, you fall into the realm of social engineering.

@@AllThatWasHidden Sorry if I sound stupid rn but: prepping supplies?

Content creators aren't KRplus employees, they're independent contractors! There is a very big difference! I'm sure that KRplus takes fine care of their actual W2 employees! In any profession, there will be pros and cons to being a W2 employee and a 1099 independent contractor!